A transversal multicenter study assessing functioning, disability and environmental factors with the comprehensive ICF core set for low back pain in Brazil

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
5
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
Autores
RIBERTO, M.
CHIAPPETTA, L. M.
LOPES, K. A. T.
Citação
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, v.50, n.2, p.153-160, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background. Low back pain is a leading cause of disability in Brazil. The multiple aspects of disability in these patients require comprehensive tools for their assessment. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) core set for low back pain is designed to comprehensively describe the experience of such patients with their functioning. Aim. This study aimed to describe functioning and contextual factors and to empirically validate the ICF core set for low back pain. Design. Cross sectional study. Setting. Three outpatient clinics in Manaus, Maceio and Sao Paulo, Brazil. Population. 135 low back pain outpatients under rehabilitation. Methods. Data concerning diagnosis, personal features, and the 78 ICF core set categories for low back pain were collected from clinical charts, physical examinations, tests, and interviews with patients from rehabilitation services in three parts of Brazil. Results. 7.7% of the categories (6 body functions and 10 activity and participation) were affected in less than 20% of the sample, and were thus considered not validated. Pain and other sensations related to the musculoskeletal system were the body most frequently impaired functions. Mobility and domestic life were the chapters of activity and limitation most often described as limited. All environmental factors were qualified as either facilitators or barriers and acted as modulators of disability. Conclusion. The comprehensive ICF core sets for low back pain can be used to describe the living experience of such individuals, although efforts to make it operational and enhance the reproducibility of the results are needed to warrant its reliable routine use. Clinical Rehabilitation Impact. This study highlights the importance of a complete assessment of chronic low back pain and demonstrate the need for multidisciplinary approach.
Palavras-chave
Disability evaluation, Quality of life, Low back pain
Referências
  1. Bautz-Holter E, 2008, EUR J PHYS REHAB MED, V44, P387
  2. Brockow T, 2004, J REHABIL MED S, V44, ps33
  3. Carragee EJ, 2004, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V35, P7, DOI 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00099-3
  4. Ciconelli R.M., 1999, REV BRAS REUMATOL, V39, P143
  5. CIEZA A, 2004, J REHABIL MED S, V44, P69, DOI 10.1080/16501960410016037
  6. Cleland J, 2011, PAIN PRACT, P1157
  7. Goljar N, 2010, DISABIL REHABIL, V32, pS50, DOI 10.3109/09638288.2010.517598
  8. Gruther W, 2009, J REHABIL MED, V41, P613, DOI 10.2340/16501977-0391
  9. Hilfiker Roger, 2009, Physiother Res Int, V14, P147, DOI 10.1002/pri.436
  10. Hoy D, 2010, BEST PRACT RES CLIN, V24, P769
  11. Huber EO, 2011, J REHABIL MED, V43, P174, DOI 10.2340/16501977-0629
  12. Jonsdottir J, 2010, DISABIL REHABIL, V32, pS78, DOI 10.3109/09638288.2010.514970
  13. Kirschneck M, 2011, MANUAL THER, V16, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.math.2010.12.011
  14. Kuijer W, 2006, DISABIL REHABIL, V28, P379, DOI 10.1080/09638280500287635
  15. Mannion AF, 2007, NAT CLIN PRACT RHEUM, V3, P610, DOI 10.1038/ncprheum0646
  16. Maus T, 2010, PHYS MED REHABIL CLI, V21, P725
  17. Ministerio da Previdencia Social, 2010, AC MENS BEN AUX DOEN
  18. Morone G, 2011, EUR J PHYS REHAB MED, V47, P533
  19. Mullis R, 2007, J REHABIL MED, V39, P353, DOI 10.2340/16501977-0059
  20. Rauch A, 2008, EUR J PHYS REHAB MED, V44, P329
  21. Riberto M, 2012, DISABIL REHABIL
  22. Riberto M, 2011, COLUNA-COLUMNA, V10, P124
  23. Riberto Marcelo, 2011, Rev Bras Enferm, V64, P938, DOI 10.1590/S0034-71672011000500021
  24. Riberto M, 2008, ACTA FISIATR, V15, P6
  25. Roe C, 2009, EUR J PHYS REHAB MED, V45, P1
  26. Roe C, 2009, J REHABIL MED, V41, P429, DOI 10.2340/16501977-0368
  27. Rosenbaum TY, 2010, J SEX MED, V7, P645, DOI 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01490.x
  28. Sanchez K, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0020274
  29. Schwarzkopf SR, 2008, CLIN RHEUMATOL, V27, P1355, DOI 10.1007/s10067-008-0916-y
  30. Silva Marcelo Cozzensa da, 2004, Cad Saude Publica, V20, P377, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2004000200005
  31. Stratford PW, 1996, PHYS THER, V76, P359
  32. Toledo RCMR, 2008, QUALITY LIFE, P16
  33. Ustun B, 2004, J REHABIL MED, V36, P7, DOI 10.1080/16501960410015344
  34. Van der Windt DAWM, 2010, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, P21
  35. Vigatto R, 2007, SPINE, V32, P481, DOI 10.1097/01.brs.0000255075.11496.47
  36. Weigl M, 2008, EUR J PHYS REHAB MED, V44, P67
  37. World Health Organization, 2001, INT CLASS FUNCT DIS