Can we respect the principles of oncologic resection in an emergency surgery to treat colon cancer?

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
30
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2015
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
Citação
WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, v.10, article ID 5, 5p, 2015
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Patients with colorectal cancer admitted to the emergency room are generally at more advanced stage of the disease and are usually submitted to a resection with curative intent in a smaller scale. In such scenario, one of the aspects to be considered is whether the principles of oncologic resection are observed when those patients diagnosed with colon cancer are treated with surgery. We selected 87 patients with adenocarcinoma of colon and/or upper rectum submitted to an emergency surgical resection. The major variables reviewed retrospectively were: the extent of resection performed, the number of dissected regional lymph nodes and the overall survival rate. Intestinal obstruction was observed in 67 patients (77%) while perforation was found in 20 patients (23%). Seven (8%) specimens had circumferential compromised margins, all found in patients with T4 tumors combine with poor clinical status. The number of dissected regional lymph nodes was greater than, or equal to, 12 in 71% of patients. While the average days of stay in the ICU was 5.7 days, the median was 3 days. The morbidity and peri-operative mortality stood at 33.6% and 20%, respectively. The outcome of an emergency surgery of colorectal cancer observed in this study was similar to those found in the literature. The principles of oncologic resection were respected when considering and analyzing the extent of the resection, the surgical margins and the number of dissected lymph nodes.
Palavras-chave
Colorectal Cancer, Emergency Surgery, Colorectal emercency surgery
Referências
  1. Alcobendas F., 2000, Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas, V92, P326
  2. DELEON MP, 1993, EUR J CANCER, V29A, P367, DOI 10.1016/0959-8049(93)90389-W
  3. Biondo S, 2005, AM J SURG, V189, P377, DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.009
  4. [Anonymous], 2016, RISK FACTOR COLON CA
  5. Tekkis PP, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P76, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000130723.81866.75
  6. Smothers L, 2003, DIS COLON RECTUM, V46, P24, DOI 10.1097/01.DCR.0000044719.17980.4C
  7. SCOTT NA, 1995, BRIT J SURG, V82, P321, DOI 10.1002/bjs.1800820311
  8. KRONBORG O, 1975, DIS COLON RECTUM, V18, P22, DOI 10.1007/BF02587233
  9. Carraro PGS, 1998, DIS COLON RECTUM, V41, P1421
  10. Alvarez JA, 2005, AM J SURG, V190, P376, DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.045
  11. Mandava N, 1996, AM J SURG, V172, P236, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00164-X
  12. RUNKEL NS, 1991, BRIT J SURG, V78, P183, DOI 10.1002/bjs.1800780216
  13. STOWER MJ, 1985, EUR J SURG ONCOL, V11, P119
  14. Chang GJ, 2007, J NATL CANCER I, V99, P433, DOI 10.1093/jnci/djk092
  15. Runkel NS, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P1260
  16. Phang PT, 2003, AM J SURG, V185, P450, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00058-8
  17. Candelaria PAP, 2005, INT SURG, V90, P231
  18. McArdle CS, 2004, BRIT J SURG, V91, P605, DOI 10.1002/bjs.4456
  19. FIELDING LP, 1974, BRIT J SURG, V61, P16, DOI 10.1002/bjs.1800610105
  20. Jemal A, 2007, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V57, P43
  21. Ascanelli A, 2003, TUMORI, V89, P36
  22. Chiarugi M, 2007, SURG ONCOL, V16, pS73, DOI 10.1016/j.suronc.2007.10.019
  23. Kruschewski M, 1998, INT J COLORECTAL DIS, V13, P247, DOI 10.1007/s003840050170
  24. Letiman IM, 1992, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V174, P513
  25. MacArdle CS, 2004, BRIT J SURG, V91, P610
  26. McArdle CS, 2006, BRIT J SURG, V93, P383
  27. Nelson H, 2001, J NATL CANC I, V93
  28. Ries LAG, 2000, SEER CANC STAT REV 1
  29. Tobaruela E, 1997, Rev Esp Enferm Dig, V89, P13
  30. Wyrzykowski AD, 2005, AM SURGEON, V71, P653
  31. Kercher KW, 2005, AM SURGEON, V71, P656