Normative values of the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests in a Brazilian population sample: discrete and regression-based norms

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_DAMASCENO_Normative_values_of_the_Brief_Repeatable_Battery_of_2018.PDF (150.19 KB)
Citações na Scopus
10
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
DOI
SciELO
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ASSOC ARQUIVOS NEURO- PSIQUIATRIA
Autores
DAMASCENO, Alfredo
AMARAL, Juliana Machado Santiago dos Santos
BARREIRA, Amilton Antunes
BECKER, Jefferson
DAMASCENO, Luciana Azevedo
DINIZ, Denise Sisterolli
FRAGOSO, Yara Dadalti
FRANCO, Paula S.
Citação
ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, v.76, n.3, p.163-169, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: Cognitive dysfunction is common in multiple sclerosis. The Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests (BRB-N) was developed to assess cognitive functions most-frequently impaired in multiple sclerosis. However, normative values are lacking in Brazil. Therefore, we aimed to provide continuous and discrete normative values for the BRB-N in a Brazilian population sample. Methods: We recruited 285 healthy individuals from the community at 10 Brazilian sites and applied the BRB-N version A in 237 participants and version B in 48 participants. Continuous norms were calculated with multiple-regression analysis. Results: Mean raw scores and the 5th percentile for each neuropsychological measure are provided, stratified by age and educational level. Healthy participants' raw scores were converted to scaled scores, which were regressed on age, sex and education, yielding equations that can be used to calculate predicted scores. Conclusion: Our normative data allow a more widespread use of the BRB-N in clinical practice and research.
Palavras-chave
cognition, multiple sclerosis, neuropsychology
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/31250
Referências
  1. Amato MP, 2006, MULT SCLER, V12, P787, DOI 10.1177/1352458506070933
  2. BEATTY WW, 1990, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V47, P297, DOI 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530030069018
  3. Benedict RHB, 2011, NAT REV NEUROL, V7, P332, DOI 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.61
  4. Brooks JBB, 2011, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V69, P887, DOI 10.1590/S0004-282X2011000700007
  5. Boringa JB, 2001, MULT SCLER, V7, P263, DOI 10.1191/135245801680209385
  6. BUSCHKE H, 1974, NEUROLOGY, V24, P1019, DOI 10.1212/WNL.24.11.1019
  7. Caceres F, 2011, J CLIN EXP NEUROPSYC, V33, P1094, DOI 10.1080/13803395.2011.603690
  8. Casaletto KB, 2015, J INT NEUROPSYCH SOC, V21, P378, DOI 10.1017/S1355617715000351
  9. D'Anna L, 2014, MULT SCLER J, V20, P1912, DOI 10.1177/1352458514523693
  10. Damasceno A, 2015, MULT SCLER RELAT DIS, V4, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.msard.2015.01.006
  11. Fredrikson S, 2010, MULT SCLER, V16, pS208
  12. GRONWALL DMA, 1977, PERCEPT MOTOR SKILL, V44, P367, DOI 10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.367
  13. Langdon DW, 2012, MULT SCLER J, V18, P891, DOI 10.1177/1352458511431076
  14. Morgan EE, 2008, J CLIN EXP NEUROPSYC, V30, P83, DOI 10.1080/13803390701233865
  15. Neves MR, 2015, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V73, P867, DOI 10.1590/0004-282X20150134
  16. Parmenter BA, 2010, J INT NEUROPSYCH SOC, V16, P6, DOI 10.1017/S1355617709990750
  17. Rao S., 1990, MANUAL BRIEF REPEATA
  18. RAO SM, 1991, NEUROLOGY, V41, P685, DOI 10.1212/WNL.41.5.685
  19. Silverberg ND, 2009, J INT NEUROPSYCH SOC, V15, P94, DOI 10.1017/S1355617708090139
  20. Smith A, 1982, SYMBOL DIGIT MODALIT
  21. Spedo CT, 2015, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOL, V29, P836, DOI 10.1080/13854046.2015.1093173
  22. Strober L, 2009, MULT SCLER J, V15, P1077, DOI 10.1177/1352458509106615
  23. Testa SM, 2009, J INT NEUROPSYCH SOC, V15, P1012, DOI 10.1017/S1355617709990713

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/45