Liposuction Induces a Compensatory Increase of Visceral Fat Which Is Effectively Counteracted by Physical Activity: A Randomized Trial

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
42
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2012
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ENDOCRINE SOC
Autores
BENATTI, Fabiana
ARTIOLI, Guilherme
PAINELLI, Vitor
SAITO, Fabio
BAPTISTA, Luciana
COSTA, Luiz Augusto
NEVES, Rodrigo
SEELAENDER, Marilia
Citação
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, v.97, n.7, p.2388-2395, 2012
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Context: Liposuction is suggested to result in long-term body fat regain that could lead to increased cardiometabolic risk. We hypothesized that physical activity could prevent this effect. Objective: Our objective was to investigate the effects of liposuction on body fat distribution and cardiometabolic risk factors in women who were either exercise trained or not after surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: Thirty-six healthy normal-weight women participated in this 6-month randomized controlled trial at the University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Interventions: Patients underwent a small-volume abdominal liposuction. Two months after surgery, the subjects were randomly allocated into two groups: trained (TR, n = 18, 4-month exercise program) and nontrained (NT, n = 18). Main Outcome Measures: Body fat distribution (assessed by computed tomography) was assessed before the intervention (PRE) and 2 months (POST2), and 6 months (POST6) after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included body composition, metabolic parameters and dietary intake, assessed at PRE, POST2, and POST6, and total energy expenditure, physical capacity, and sc adipocyte size and lipid metabolism-related gene expression, assessed at PRE and POST6. Results: Liposuction was effective in reducing sc abdominal fat (PRE vs. POST2, P = 0.0001). Despite the sustained sc abdominal fat decrement at POST6 (P = 0.0001), the NT group showed a significant 10% increase in visceral fat from PRE to POST6 (P = 0.04; effect size = -0.72) and decreased energy expenditure (P = 0.01; effect size = 0.95) when compared with TR. Dietary intake, adipocyte size, and gene expression were unchanged over time. Conclusion: Abdominal liposuction does not induce regrowth of fat, but it does trigger a compensatory increase of visceral fat, which is effectively counteracted by physical activity.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery, 2006, 2006 GUID LIP SURG
  2. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2010, STAT COSM SURG 2009
  3. Artioli GG, 2010, J SPORT SCI, V28, P21, DOI 10.1080/02640410903428574
  4. Baptista IL, 2010, MUSCLE NERVE, V41, P800, DOI 10.1002/mus.21578
  5. Booth FW, 2009, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V587, P5527, DOI 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.179507
  6. Busetto L, 2008, NUTR METAB CARDIOVAS, V18, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.numecd.2006.09.009
  7. Byrne HK, 2001, INT J SPORT NUTR EXE, V11, P15
  8. Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
  9. Cooper R, 2010, BRIT MED J, V341, DOI 10.1136/bmj.c4467
  10. D'Andrea F, 2005, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V29, P472, DOI 10.1007/s00266-005-0089-x
  11. Davis DA, 2006, INT J OBESITY, V30, P1217, DOI 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803120
  12. Frew KE, 2005, DERMATOL SURG, V31, P292
  13. FRIEDEWA.WT, 1972, CLIN CHEM, V18, P499
  14. Giese SY, 2001, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V108, P510, DOI 10.1097/00006534-200108000-00035
  15. Giugliano G, 2004, BRIT J PLAST SURG, V57, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2003.12.010
  16. Gonzalez-Ortiz M, 2002, HORM METAB RES, V34, P446, DOI 10.1055/s-2002-33603
  17. Harris RBS, 2002, AM J PHYSIOL-REG I, V283, pR1094, DOI 10.1152/ajpregu.00339.2002
  18. Hausman DB, 2004, EXP BIOL MED, V229, P512
  19. Hernandez TL, 2011, OBESITY, V19, P1388, DOI 10.1038/oby.2011.64
  20. Janiszewski PM, 2007, DIABETES CARE, V30, P3105, DOI 10.2337/dc07-0945
  21. Joyner MJ, 2009, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V587, P5551, DOI 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.179432
  22. Kathiresan S, 2006, CIRCULATION, V113, P20, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATINAHA.105.567107
  23. KENNEDY GC, 1953, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V140, P578, DOI 10.1098/rspb.1953.0009
  24. Klein S, 2004, NEW ENGL J MED, V350, P2549, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa033179
  25. MAEHLUM S, 1986, METABOLISM, V35, P425, DOI 10.1016/0026-0495(86)90132-0
  26. Martinez-Abundis E, 2007, ANN PLAS SURG, V58, P416, DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000240033.00047.cc
  27. Mauer MM, 2001, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V25, P15, DOI 10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00047-6
  28. Mohammed BS, 2008, OBESITY, V16, P2648, DOI 10.1038/oby.2008.418
  29. Robles-Cervantes JA, 2004, ANN PLAS SURG, V52, P64, DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000096448.59407.43
  30. Ross R, 2004, OBES RES, V12, P789, DOI 10.1038/oby.2004.95
  31. Ross R, 2000, ANN INTERN MED, V133, P92
  32. Scagliusi FB, 2008, J AM DIET ASSOC, V108, P2031, DOI 10.1016/j.jada.2008.09.012
  33. Scagliusi FB, 2003, J AM DIET ASSOC, V103, P1306, DOI 10.1053/S0002-8223(03)01074-5
  34. Smith SR, 2001, METABOLISM, V50, P425, DOI 10.1053/meta.2001.21693
  35. Votruba SB, 2000, NUTRITION, V16, P179, DOI 10.1016/S0899-9007(99)00264-6
  36. Wajchenberg BL, 2000, ENDOCR REV, V21, P697, DOI 10.1210/er.21.6.697
  37. Weber RV, 2000, AM J PHYSIOL-REG I, V279, pR936
  38. Williams K, 2003, CIRCULATION, V108, P2312, DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.0000097113.11419.9E
  39. Ybarra J, 2008, OBES SURG, V18, P408, DOI 10.1007/s11695-007-9261-5
  40. Yoshizumi T, 1999, RADIOLOGY, V211, P283