Evaluation of Functional Outcomes after Stapes Surgery in Patients with Clinical Otosclerosis in a Teaching Institution

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
11
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
Citação
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, v.20, n.1, p.39-42, 2016
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Introduction Otosclerosis is a primary disease of the temporal bone that leads to stapes ankylosis. Hearing loss is the main symptom. Treatment includes surgery, medical treatment, and sound amplification therapy alone or in combination. Objective To evaluate the functional outcomes of patients with clinical diagnosis of otosclerosis undergoing primary stapes surgery in a teaching institution. Method Retrospective descriptive study. Results A total of 210 ears of 163 patients underwent stapes surgery. Of the 163 patients, 116 (71.2%) underwent unilateral surgery and 47 (28.8%) underwent bilateral surgery. Six of the 210 operated ears had obliterative otosclerosis. The average preoperative and postoperative air-bone gap was 32.06 and 4.39 dB, respectively. The mean preoperative and postoperative bone conduction threshold was 23.17 and 19.82 dB, respectively. A total of 184 (87.6%) ears had a residual air-bone gap <10 dB, and 196 (93.3%) had a residual air-bone gap ±15 dB. Two patients (0.95%) had severe sensorineural hearing loss. Conclusion Stapes surgery showed excellent functional hearing outcomes in this study. This surgerymay be performed in educational institutions with the supervision of experienced surgeons.
Palavras-chave
hearing loss, otosclerosis, stapes surgery, stapes mobilization
Referências
  1. GLASSCOCK ME, 1995, LARYNGOSCOPE, V105, P899, DOI 10.1288/00005537-199509000-00005
  2. Ueda H, 1999, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V113, P417
  3. Rama-Lopez J, 2006, OTOL NEUROTOL, V27, P153, DOI 10.1097/01.mao.0000197387.29534.26
  4. Wegner I, 2014, LARYNGOSCOPE, V124, P1687, DOI 10.1002/lary.24514
  5. Hausler R, 2007, ADV OTO-RHINO-LARYNG, V65, P1, DOI 10.1159/000098661
  6. FISCH U, 1982, AM J OTOL, V4, P112
  7. Ataide Andre Luiz de, 2013, Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol., V79, P325, DOI 10.5935/1808-8694.20130058
  8. DUNCAN NO, 1988, ANN OTO RHINOL LARYN, V97, P109
  9. Ealy M, 2014, OTOL NEUROTOL, V35, P395, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000244
  10. Fang L, 2014, AURIS NASUS LARYNX, V41, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.anl.2013.12.014
  11. Khalfallah A, 2011, ANN HUM GENET, V75, P598, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2011.00665.x
  12. MAIR IWS, 1989, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V103, P259, DOI 10.1017/S0022215100108655
  13. Moscillo L, 2006, AM J OTOLARYNG, V27, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.amjoto.2006.03.002
  14. Oeken J, 2013, HNO, V61, P504, DOI 10.1007/s00106-012-2646-3
  15. PALVA T, 1987, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, V104, P153, DOI 10.3109/00016488709109061
  16. Shabana YK, 1999, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V113, P413
  17. Sommen M, 2014, OTOL NEUROTOL, V35, P1058, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000334
  18. van Loon MC, 2014, OTOL NEUROTOL, V35, P1707, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000637
  19. Vincent R, 2006, OTOL NEUROTOL, V27, pS25, DOI 10.1097/01.mao.0000235311.80066.df
  20. Zuur CL, 2003, OTOL NEUROTOL, V24, P863, DOI 10.1097/00129492-200311000-00006
  21. 1977, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, V86, P813
  22. 2007, Eur J Hum Genet, V15, P362
  23. 1961, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, V70, P1062
  24. 2002, Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac, V119, P227