Comparative Morphometric Analysis of 5 Interpositional Arterial Autograft Options for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorIMAKUMA, E. S.
dc.contributor.authorBORDINI, A. L.
dc.contributor.authorMILLAN, L. S.
dc.contributor.authorMASSAROLLO, P. C. B.
dc.contributor.authorCALDINI, E. T. E. G.
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-06T19:09:38Z
dc.date.available2015-02-06T19:09:38Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractIn living donor liver transplantation, the right-sided graft presents thin and short vessels, bringing forward a more difficult anastomosis. In these cases, an interpositional arterial autograft can be used to favor the performance of the arterial anastomosis, making the procedure easier and avoiding surgical complications. Objective. We compared the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), the splenic artery (SA), the inferior epigastric artery (TEA), the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery (LCFA), and the proper hepatic artery (PHA) as options for interpositional autograft in living donor liver transplantation. Method. Segments of at least 3 cm of all 5 arteries were harvested from 16 fresh adult cadavers from both genders through standardized dissection. The analyzed measures were proximal and distal diameter and length. The proximal diameter of the RHA and the distal diameter of the SA, IMA, IEA and the LCFA were compared to the distal diameter of the RHA. The proximal and distal diameters of the SA, TEA and LCFA were compared to study caliber gain of each artery. Results. All arteries except the IMA showed statistical significant difference in relation to the RHA in terms of diameter. Regarding caliber gain, the arteries demonstrated statistical significant difference. All the harvested arteries except PHA were 3 cm in length. Conclusion. The IMA demonstrated the best compatibility with the RI-TA in terms of diameter and showed sufficient length to be employed as interpositional graft. The PHA, the SA, the TEA and the LCFA presented statistically significant different diameters when compared to the RHA. Among these vessels, only the PHA did not show sufficient mean length.
dc.description.conferencedateOCT 12-15, 2013
dc.description.conferencelocalRio de Janiero, BRAZIL
dc.description.conferencename13th Congress of the Brazilian-Transplantation-Society
dc.description.indexMEDLINE
dc.description.sponsorshipFundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.identifier.citationTRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, v.46, n.6, p.1784-1788, 2014
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.05.047
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2623
dc.identifier.issn0041-1345
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/8260
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.relation.ispartofTransplantation Proceedings
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.rights.holderCopyright ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.subject.othersplenic artery
dc.subject.otherhepatic-artery
dc.subject.othervascular graft
dc.subject.otherreconstruction
dc.subject.othercomplications
dc.subject.otherligation
dc.subject.wosImmunology
dc.subject.wosSurgery
dc.subject.wosTransplantation
dc.titleComparative Morphometric Analysis of 5 Interpositional Arterial Autograft Options for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation
dc.typearticle
dc.type.categoryarticle; proceedings paper
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
hcfmusp.citation.scopus3
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcERNESTO SASAKI IMAKUMA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcANDRE LEOPOLDINO BORDINI
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcLINCOLN SAITO MILLAN
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcPAULO CELSO BOSCO MASSAROLLO
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcELIA TAMASO ESPIN GARCIA CALZOLARI
hcfmusp.description.beginpage1784
hcfmusp.description.endpage1788
hcfmusp.description.issue6
hcfmusp.description.volume46
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.scopus2-s2.0-84906089937
hcfmusp.origem.wosWOS:000341076800032
hcfmusp.publisher.cityNEW YORK
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSA
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAbdullah SS, 2006, SURG RADIOL ANAT, V28, P468, DOI 10.1007/s00276-006-0121-0
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBalci D, 2008, TRANSPL P, V40, P1786, DOI 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.10.012
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBroering D C, 2004, HPB (Oxford), V6, P76, DOI 10.1080/13651820310020774
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCHERQUI D, 1994, AM J SURG, V167, P327, DOI 10.1016/0002-9610(94)90210-0
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDELIN NA, 1973, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V139, P763
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGuang-Dong P, 2006, HPB DIS INT, V5, P345
hcfmusp.relation.referenceIkegami T, 2000, TRANSPLANTATION, V69, P1953, DOI 10.1097/00007890-200005150-00036
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKatsuhiro A, 2004, TRANSPLANT INT, V17, P639
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKawamoto S, 1998, SURG TODAY, V28, P1237
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKimata Y, 1998, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V102, P1517, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199810000-00026
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLANCIAULT G, 1976, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V71, P851
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLautt WW, 1988, KIDNEY LIVER DISEASE, P244
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLo CM, 2003, LIVER TRANSPLANT, V9, P626, DOI 10.1053/jlts.2003.50081
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLo CM, 2003, TRANSPLANTATION, V75, pS12, DOI 10.1097/01.TP.0000046534.45645.47
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMalago M, 2003, ANN SURG, V238, P853, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000098619.71694.74
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMarcos A, 2003, LIVER TRANSPLANT, V9, P570, DOI 10.1053/jlts.2003.50093
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMarcos A, 2000, LIVER TRANSPLANT, V6, pS59, DOI 10.1053/jlts.2000.19011
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMies S, 1980, Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo, V35, P121
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMILLOY FJ, 1960, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V110, P293
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMuiesan P, 2001, BRIT J SURG, V88, P70, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01623.x
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNakatsuka T, 1999, TRANSPLANTATION, V67, P1490, DOI 10.1097/00007890-199906150-00019
hcfmusp.relation.referenceOkazaki M, 2006, LIVER TRANSPLANT, V12, P46, DOI 10.1002/lt.20550
hcfmusp.relation.referenceOtsubo R, 2006, INT J CARDIOL, V109, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.06.028
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRAIA S, 1989, LANCET, V2, P497
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSamstein B, 2001, ANNU REV MED, V52, P147, DOI 10.1146/annurev.med.52.1.147
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSellers MT, 2002, AM J TRANSPLANT, V2, P471, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20513.x
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVanecek R, 1976, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V53
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-05-10
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd7e02a04-c983-4abf-8337-ce73ad1efd17
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf90a0a31-b8db-4eb8-8908-939af95fc493
relation.isAuthorOfPublication84ba2f6c-87c2-4b56-8354-9f310b491a81
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdf6cd823-c450-450b-b55b-ab63c4155388
relation.isAuthorOfPublication89466bf8-9016-479f-a665-a0ceafe8b4b1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery84ba2f6c-87c2-4b56-8354-9f310b491a81
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
art_IMAKUMA_Comparative_Morphometric_Analysis_of_5_Interpositional_Arterial_Autograft_2014.PDF
Tamanho:
333.15 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
publishedVersion (English)
Baixar
Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MCG
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MPT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICESP
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/02
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/55
Carregar mais