Biometric measurements involving the terminal portion of the thoracic duct on left cervical level IV: an anatomic study

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
7
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER
Citação
ANATOMICAL SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, v.91, n.3, p.274-279, 2016
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
To determine the point of entrance of the thoracic duct in the venous system, as well as to evaluate some biometric measurements concerning its terminal portion, we conducted an anatomic study on 25 non-preserved cadavers. The termination of the thoracic duct occurred on the confluence between the left internal jugular vein and the left subclavian vein in 60 % of the individuals. The average results for the biometric measurements were: distance between the end of left internal jugular vein and omohyoid muscle 31.2 +/- A 2.7 mm; distance between the end of thoracic duct and the left internal jugular vein 0.0 +/- A 0.0 mm; distance between the end of thoracic duct and the left subclavian vein 3.6 +/- A 1.0 mm; distance between the end of thoracic duct and the left brachiocephalic vein 10.7 +/- A 3.1 mm. Moreover, it was identified that the left internal jugular vein length in level IV, measured between its entrance in the left subclavian vein and the omohyoid muscle, was able to predict the termination of the thoracic duct on the junction between the left internal jugular vein and the left subclavian vein (OR = 2.99) with high accuracy (79.3 %). In addition, the left internal jugular vein length at level IV was able to predict the localization of thoracic duct termination. Thus, this finding has practical value in minimizing the risk for a potential chyle leak during or after a left-sided neck dissection.
Palavras-chave
Anatomic variation, Anatomy, Neck dissection, Surgery, Thoracic duct
Referências
  1. Hematti H, 2011, THORAC SURG CLIN, V21, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2011.01.002
  2. Skandalakis JE, 2007, SURG ONCOL CLIN N AM, V16, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.soc.2006.10.006
  3. KINNAERT P, 1973, J ANAT, V115, P45
  4. Smoke A, 2008, NUTR CLIN PRACT, V23, P529, DOI 10.1177/0884533608323424
  5. Phang K, 2014, CLIN ANAT, V27, P637, DOI 10.1002/ca.22337
  6. Shimada K, 1997, CLIN ANAT, V10, P163, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1997)10:3<163::AID-CA2>3.0.CO;2-V
  7. Cernea CR, 2012, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V34, P1570, DOI 10.1002/hed.21956
  8. Langford RJ, 1999, J CRANIO MAXILL SURG, V27, P100, DOI 10.1016/S1010-5182(99)80021-3
  9. Campisi CC, 2013, CURR OPIN OTOLARYNGO, V21, P150, DOI 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32835e9d97
  10. JDANOV D. A., 1959, ACTA ANAT, V37, P20
  11. Kaur D, 2012, Singapore Med J, V53, pe1
  12. Nowak Katarzyna, 2011, Otolaryngol Pol, V65, P128, DOI 10.1016/S0030-6657(11)70642-4
  13. Vaz Marcelo Alexandre Costa, 2006, J Bras Pneumol, V32 Suppl 4, pS197, DOI 10.1590/S1806-37132006000900006