Hypertonic saline solution reduces the inflammatory response in endotoxemic rats
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
27
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2012
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
Citação
CLINICS, v.67, n.12, p.1463-1468, 2012
Resumo
OBJECTIVE: Volume replacement in septic patients improves hemodynamic stability. This effect can reduce the inflammatory response. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of 7.5% hypertonic saline solution versus 0.9% normal saline solution for volume replacement during an inflammatory response in endotoxemic rats. METHODS: We measured cytokines (serum and gut), nitrite, and lipid peroxidation (TBARS) as indicators of oxidative stress in the gut. Rats were divided into four groups: control group (C) that did not receive lipopolysaccharide; lipopolysaccharide injection without treatment (LPS); lipopolysaccharide injection with saline treatment (LPS + S); and lipopolysaccharide injection with hypertonic saline treatment (LPS + H). Serum and intestine were collected. Measurements were taken at 1.5, 8, and 24 h after lipopolysaccharide administration. RESULTS: Of the four groups, the LPS + H group had the highest survival rate. Hypertonic saline solution treatment led to lower levels of IL-6, IL-10, nitric oxide, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances compared to 0.9% normal saline. In addition, hypertonic saline treatment resulted in a lower mortality compared to 0.9% normal saline treatment in endotoxemic rats. Volume replacement reduced levels of inflammatory mediators in the plasma and gut. CONCLUSION: Hypertonic saline treatment reduced mortality and lowered levels of inflammatory mediators in endotoxemic rats. Hypertonic saline also has the advantage of requiring less volume replacement.
Palavras-chave
LPS, Hypertonic Solution, Interleukin, Oxidative Stress, Intestine
Referências
- Angle N, 2000, SHOCK, V14, P503, DOI 10.1097/00024382-200014050-00002
- Barbeiro DF, 2011, IMMUNOBIOLOGY, V216, P302, DOI 10.1016/j.imbio.2010.08.002
- BERG DJ, 1995, J CLIN INVEST, V96, P2339, DOI 10.1172/JCI118290
- Calandra T, 2000, NAT MED, V6, P164, DOI 10.1038/72262
- Ci XX, 2010, INFLAMMATION, V33, P126, DOI 10.1007/s10753-009-9166-7
- Ciesla DJ, 2000, SHOCK, V14, P265, DOI 10.1097/00024382-200014030-00004
- Ciesla DJ, 2000, SHOCK, V14, P9
- Ciesla DJ, 2001, J TRAUMA, V50, P206, DOI 10.1097/00005373-200102000-00004
- Dal-Pizzol F, 2006, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V173, P84, DOI 10.1164/rccm.200507-1118OC
- FIORENTINO DF, 1991, J IMMUNOL, V147, P3815
- Junger WG, 1998, J CLIN INVEST, V101, P2768, DOI 10.1172/JCI1354
- Lenassi Metka, 2007, Saline Systems, V3, P3, DOI 10.1186/1746-1448-3-3
- Machado MCC, 2006, PANCREAS, V32, P80, DOI 10.1097/01.mpa.0000191645.01926.8f
- Melo ES, 2010, MOL IMMUNOL, V47, P2587, DOI 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.06.011
- Melo ES, 2010, IMMUNOBIOLOGY, V215, P435, DOI 10.1016/j.imbio.2009.09.002
- Moretti AIS, 2009, PANCREAS, V38, P507, DOI 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31819fef75
- Oberbeck R, 2001, CRIT CARE MED, V29, P380, DOI 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00029
- Oreopoulos GD, 2000, SHOCK, V14, P414
- Oreopoulos GD, 2000, SHOCK, V14, P409, DOI 10.1097/00024382-200014030-00029
- Rios ECS, 2011, CLINICS, V66, P469, DOI 10.1590/S1807-59322011000300019
- Rios ECS, 2010, CLIN EXP PHARMACOL P, V37, P35, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2009.05220.x
- Rizoli SB, 2000, AM J PHYSIOL-CELL PH, V279, pC619
- Song GY, 1999, SURGERY, V126, P378, DOI 10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70180-7
- Soriano FG, 2006, CRIT CARE MED, V34, P1073, DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000206470.47721.8D
- Soriano FG, 2011, SHOCK, V35, P560, DOI 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31820fe5d5
- Soriano FG, 2002, SHOCK, V17, P286, DOI 10.1097/00024382-200204000-00008
- Steinhauser ME, 1999, J IMMUNOL, V162, P392
- Texereau J, 2004, CRIT CARE MED, V32, pS313, DOI 10.1097/01.CMM.0000126363.46191.DC
- Thiel M, 2001, J LEUKOCYTE BIOL, V70, P261
- van Haren FMP, 2012, SHOCK, V37, P268, DOI 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31823f152f
- Zallen G, 2000, J TRAUMA, V48, P45, DOI 10.1097/00005373-200001000-00008