Robotic simple prostatectomy: Technical considerations and outcomes

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorCOLOMBO, J. R. Jr.
dc.contributor.authorMITRE, A. I.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T19:54:25Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T19:54:25Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractThe open approach has been the gold standard for simple prostatectomy, either through a retropubic enucleation with an anterior transverse prostatic capsulotomy (Millin) or through a suprapubic transvesical access. The simple laparoscopic prostatectomy may be an alternative to open simple prostatectomy with potentially lower morbidity, lower blood loss, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay, and earlier return to normal activities In 2002, Mariano et al.7 first described the technique for laparoscopic simple prostatectomy that was modified by several authors using both transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches. The American Urological Association (AUA) and European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines suggest that open surgery should be the treatment for prostate volume higher than 80 g. Similarly to others procedures, some skilled urologists have replaced the open simple prostatectomy by the laparoscopic counterpart. Robotics brought contributions to laparoscopic simple prostatectomy allowing the enucleation of adenoma without the need for special devices due to the advantages provided by better visualization and robotic-articulated instruments. It also potentially facilitates hemostatic sutures to control the main prostatic vessels, resulting in reduced intraoperative blood loss. The closure of bladder and/or prostatic capsule is easier with robotic assistance. Robotic simple prostatectomy seems to have a shorter learning curve than pure laparoscopic, what would be a real alternative to a larger number of urologists to perform such a procedure with the minimally invasive approach. The drawbacks of robotic simple prostatectomy are the costs and the preferential transperitoneal approach. Although currently literature is scanty on this subject, multicentric studies with larger numbers of subjects are expected to compare the open, laparoscopic, and robotic simple prostatectomy. © Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012.
dc.identifier.citationColombo, J. R. Jr.; Mitre, A. I.. Robotic simple prostatectomy: Technical considerations and outcomes. In: . ROBOTIC UROLOGIC SURGERY, SECOND EDITION: SPRINGER-VERLAG LONDON LTD, 2012. p.241-245.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-1-84882-800-1_22
dc.identifier.isbn9781848828001; 9781848827998
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/51032
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER-VERLAG LONDON LTD
dc.relation.ispartofROBOTIC UROLOGIC SURGERY, SECOND EDITION
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.rights.holderCopyright SPRINGER-VERLAG LONDON LTD
dc.subjectLaparoscopy
dc.subjectProstate
dc.subjectProstatectomy
dc.subjectProstatic hyperplasia
dc.subjectRobotics
dc.titleRobotic simple prostatectomy: Technical considerations and outcomes
dc.typebookPart
dc.type.categorybook chapter
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
hcfmusp.citation.scopus0
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcJOSE ROBERTO COLOMBO JUNIOR
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcANUAR IBRAHIM MITRE
hcfmusp.description.beginpage241
hcfmusp.description.endpage245
hcfmusp.origemSCOPUS
hcfmusp.origem.scopus2-s2.0-84956763744
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAUA guidelines on management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (2003). Chapter 1: Diagnosis and treatment recommendations (2003) J Urol, 170, p. 530
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEAU practice guidelines: management of BPH, 2004. Section 4.4.3
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBaumert, H., Ballaro, A., Dugardin, F., Kaisary, A.V., Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy: A comparative study (2006) J Urol, 175, p. 1691
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMcCullough, T.C., Heldwein, F.L., Soon, S.J., Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy: An evaluation of morbidity (2009) J Endourol, 23, p. 129
hcfmusp.relation.referenceOesterling, J.E., Retropubic and suprapubic prostatectomy Campbell’s Urology, 2. , Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ, eds, 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders
hcfmusp.relation.reference1998:1529-1540: chap 50
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRehman, J., Khan, S.A., Sukkarieh, T., Chughtai, B., Waltzer, W.C., Extraperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy (Adenomectomy) for obstructing benign prostatic hyperplasia: Transvesical and transcapsular (Millin) techniques (2005) J Endourol, 19, p. 491
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMariano, M.B., Graziottin, T.M., Tefilli, M.V., Laparoscopic prostatectomy with vascular control for benign prostatic hyperplasia (2002) J Urol, 167, p. 2528
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMariano, M.B., Tefilli, M.V., Graziottin, T.M., Morales, C.M., Goldraich, I.H., Laparoscopic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A six-year experience (2006) Eur Urol, 49, p. 127
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVan Velthoven, R., Peltier, A., Laguna, M.P., Piechaud, T., Laparoscopic extraperitoneal adenomectomy (Millin): Pilot study on feasibility (2004) Eur Urol, 45, p. 103
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNadler, R.B., Blunt, L.W., User, H.M., Vallancien, G., Preperitoneal laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (2004) Urology, 63, p. 778
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSotelo, R., Spaliviero, M., Garcia-Segui, A., Laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy (2005) J Urol, 173, p. 757
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSotelo, R.J., Garcia, A.J., Carmona, O., Banda, E., Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy. Experience in 71 cases (2007) J Urol, 177, p. 578
hcfmusp.relation.referencePorpiglia, F., Terrone, C., Renard, J., Transcapsular adenomectomy (Millin): A comparative study, extraperitoneal laparoscopy versus open surgery (2006) Eur Urol, 49, p. 120
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBarret, E., Bracq, A., Braud, G., The morbidity of laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy (2006) Eur Urol, 5, p. 274
hcfmusp.relation.referenceZhou, L.Y., Xiao, J., Chen, H., Zhu, Y.P., Sun, Y.W., Xuan, O., Extraperitoneal laparoscopic adenomectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (2009) World J Urol, 27, p. 385
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSotelo, R., Clavijo, R., Carmona, O., Robotic simple prostatectomy (2008) J Urol, 179, p. 513
hcfmusp.relation.referenceYuh, B., Laungani, R., Perimutter, A., Robotassisted Millin’s retropubic prostatectomy: Case series (2008) Can J Urol, 15, p. 4101
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJohn, H., Bucher, C., Engel, N., Fischer, B., Fehr, J.L., Preperitoneal robotic prostate adenomectomy (2009) Urology, 73, p. 811
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSerreta, V., Morgia, G., Fondacaro, L., Open prostatectomy for benign prostatic enlargement in southern Europe in the late 1990’s: A contemporary series of 1800 interventions (2002) Urology, 60, p. 623
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGratzke, C., Schlenker, B., Seitz, M., Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: Results of a prospective multicenter study (2007) J Urol, 177, p. 1419
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-06-09
relation.isAuthorOfPublication97be6af9-4448-4d52-bb8b-3ef401c0fb2f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0d6579a9-2244-406b-b23e-1104c40d3b27
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery97be6af9-4448-4d52-bb8b-3ef401c0fb2f
Arquivos
Coleções
Livros e Capítulos de Livros - FM/MCG
Livros e Capítulos de Livros - HC/ICESP
Livros e Capítulos de Livros - LIM/55