In vitro activity of potential old and new drugs against multidrug-resistant gram-negatives

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
33
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2015
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER JAPAN KK
Citação
JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, v.21, n.1/Fev, p.114-117, 2015
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro susceptibility of MDR gram-negatives bacteria to old drugs such as polymyxin B, minocycline and fosfomycin and new drugs such as tigecycline. Methods: One hundred and fifty-three isolates from 4 Brazilian hospitals were evaluated. Forty-seven Acinetobacter baumannii resistant to carbapenens harboring adeB, bla(OxA23), bla(OxA51), bla(OxA143) 23, and bla(IMP) genes, 48 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia including isolates resistant to levofloxacin and/or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole harboring sul-1, sul-2 and qnr(MR) and 8 Serratia marcescens and 50 Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant to carbapenens harboring bla(KPC-2) were tested to determine their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) by microdilution to the following drugs: minocycline, ampicillin-sulbactam, tigecycline, and polymyxin B and by agar dilution to fosfomycin according with breakpoint criteria of CLSI and EUCAST (fosfomycin). In addition, EUCAST fosfomycin breakpoint for Pseudomonas spp. was applied for Acinetobacter spp and S. maltophilia, the FDA criteria for tigecycline was used for Acinetobacter spp and S. maltophilia and the Pseudomonas spp polymyxin B CLSI criterion was used for S. maltophilia. Results: Tigecycline showed the best in vitro activity against the MDR gram-negative evaluated, followed by polymyxin B and fosfomycin. Polymyxin B resistance among K. pneumoniae was detected in 6 isolates, using the breakpoint of MIC > 8 ug/mL. Two of these isolates were resistant to tigecycline. Minocycline was tested only against S. maltophilia and A. baumannii and showed excellent activity against both. Conclusions: Fosfomycin seems to not be an option to treat infections due to the A. baumannii and S. maltophilia isolates according with EUCAST breakpoint, on the other hand, showed excellent activity against S. marcescens and K. pneumoniae. (C) 2014, Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases.
Palavras-chave
Polymyxin B, Fosfomycin, Tigecycline, Minocycline, MDR gram-negatives
Referências
  1. Ahmed NH, 2012, BMC RES NOTES, V3, P215
  2. Behera B, 2009, INDIAN J MED RES, V129, P446
  3. Brooke JS, 2012, CLIN MICROBIOL REV, V25, P2, DOI [10.1128/​CMR.00019-11, 10.1128/CMR.00019-11]
  4. Chen Y, 2011, J ANTIMICROB CHEMOTH, V66, P1255, DOI 10.1093/jac/dkr082
  5. Cho YS, 2012, INFECTION, V40, P27, DOI 10.1007/s15010-011-0192-7
  6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2013, PERF STAND ANT SUSC
  7. Czihal P, 2012, ACS CHEM BIOL, V7, P1281, DOI 10.1021/cb300063v
  8. EUCAST, 2013, BREAKP TABL INT MICS
  9. Falagas ME, 2010, LANCET INFECT DIS, V10, P43, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70325-1
  10. FDA. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, TYG TIG INJ
  11. Fuste E, 2012, FUTURE MICROBIOL, V7, P781, DOI [10.2217/fmb.12.40, 10.2217/FMB.12.40]
  12. Gales AC, 2011, J ANTIMICROB CHEMOTH, V66, P2070, DOI 10.1093/jac/dkr239
  13. Higgins PG, 2009, ANTIMICROB AGENTS CH, V53, P5035, DOI 10.1128/AAC.00856-09
  14. Hu LF, 2011, INT J ANTIMICROB AG, V37, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.10.025
  15. Karageorgopoulos DE, 2012, J ANTIMICROB CHEMOTH, V67, P255, DOI 10.1093/jac/dkr466
  16. Ku K, 2012, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V40, P983, DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.12.014
  17. Liao CH, 2008, INT J ANTIMICROB S3, V32, P192
  18. Lim TP, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0018485
  19. Lin L, 2009, INT J ANTIMICROB AG, V33, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.06.027
  20. Livermore DM, 2009, J ANTIMICROB CHEMOTH, V64, P29, DOI 10.1093/jac/dkp255
  21. Livermore DM, 2011, INT J ANTIMICROB AG, V37, P415, DOI 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.01.012
  22. Mendes RE, 2007, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V45, P544, DOI 10.1128/JCM.01728-06
  23. Mostachio AK, 2012, INT J ANTIMICROB AG, V39, P396, DOI 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.01.021
  24. Nicodemo AC, 2004, J ANTIMICROB CHEMOTH, V53, P604, DOI 10.1093/jac/dkh128
  25. Paksu MS, 2012, INT J ANTIMICROB AG, V40, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.04.010
  26. Perdigao-Neto LV, 2013, ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, V57
  27. Rumbo C, 2013, ANTIMICROB AGENTS CH, V57, P5247, DOI 10.1128/AAC.00730-13
  28. Sanchez MB, 2008, BMC MICROBIOL, V8, DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-8-148
  29. Toleman MA, 2006, MICROBIOL MOL BIOL R, V70, P296, DOI 10.1128/MMBR.00048-05
  30. Woodford N, 2006, INT J ANTIMICROB AG, V27, P351, DOI 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.01.004