Morphometric Wing Characters as a Tool for Mosquito Identification

dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorWILKE, Andre Barretto Bruno
dc.contributor.authorCHRISTE, Rafael de Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorMULTINI, Laura Cristina
dc.contributor.authorVIDAL, Paloma Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorWILK-DA-SILVA, Ramon
dc.contributor.authorCARVALHO, Gabriela Cristina de
dc.contributor.authorMARRELLI, Mauro Toledo
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-17T16:59:41Z
dc.date.available2016-10-17T16:59:41Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractMosquitoes are responsible for the transmission of important infectious diseases, causing millions of deaths every year and endangering approximately 3 billion people around the world. As such, precise identification of mosquito species is crucial for an understanding of epidemiological patterns of disease transmission. Currently, the most common method of mosquito identification relies on morphological taxonomic keys, which do not always distinguish cryptic species. However, wing geometric morphometrics is a promising tool for the identification of vector mosquitoes, sibling and cryptic species included. This study therefore sought to accurately identify mosquito species from the three most epidemiologically important mosquito genera using wing morphometrics. Twelve mosquito species from three epidemiologically important genera (Aedes, Anopheles and Culex) were collected and identified by taxonomic keys. Next, the right wing of each adult female mosquito was removed and photographed, and the coordinates of eighteen digitized landmarks at the intersections of wing veins were collected. The allometric influence was assessed, and canonical variate analysis and thin-plate splines were used for species identification. Cross-validated reclassification tests were performed for each individual, and a Neighbor Joining tree was constructed to illustrate species segregation patterns. The analyses were carried out and the graphs plotted with TpsUtil 1.29, TpsRelw 1.39, MorphoJ 1.02 and Past 2.17c. Canonical variate analysis for Aedes, Anopheles and Culex genera showed three clear clusters in morphospace, correctly distinguishing the three mosquito genera, and pairwise cross-validated reclassification resulted in at least 99% accuracy; subgenera were also identified correctly with a mean accuracy of 96%, and in 88 of the 132 possible comparisons, species were identified with 100% accuracy after the data was subjected to reclassification. Our results showed that Aedes, Culex and Anopheles were correctly distinguished by wing shape. For the lower hierarchical levels (subgenera and species), wing geometric morphometrics was also efficient, resulting in high reclassification scores.
dc.description.indexMEDLINE
dc.description.sponsorshipState of Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2013/15313-4]
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPESP [2012/19117-2]
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE, v.11, n.8, article ID e0161643, 12p, 2016
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0161643
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/16522
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
dc.relation.ispartofPlos One
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.holderCopyright PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
dc.subject.otherculex diptera-culicidae
dc.subject.othergeometric morphometrics
dc.subject.othersao-paulo
dc.subject.otherpopulation-genetics
dc.subject.othercomplex mosquitos
dc.subject.otherdengue epidemics
dc.subject.otherbrazil
dc.subject.otherquinquefasciatus
dc.subject.othervector
dc.subject.otherphylogeny
dc.subject.wosMultidisciplinary Sciences
dc.titleMorphometric Wing Characters as a Tool for Mosquito Identification
dc.typearticle
dc.type.categoryoriginal article
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
hcfmusp.author.externalWILKE, Andre Barretto Bruno:Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Saude Publ, Dept Epidemiol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalCHRISTE, Rafael de Oliveira:Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalVIDAL, Paloma Oliveira:Inst Butantan, Dept Parasitol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalWILK-DA-SILVA, Ramon:Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Saude Publ, Dept Epidemiol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalCARVALHO, Gabriela Cristina de:Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Saude Publ, Dept Epidemiol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalMARRELLI, Mauro Toledo:Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Saude Publ, Dept Epidemiol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
hcfmusp.citation.scopus70
hcfmusp.description.articlenumbere0161643
hcfmusp.description.issue8
hcfmusp.description.volume11
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.pubmed27551777
hcfmusp.origem.scopus2-s2.0-84984821808
hcfmusp.origem.wosWOS:000381768800061
hcfmusp.publisher.citySAN FRANCISCO
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSA
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBorstler J, 2014, J VECTOR ECOL, V39, P204, DOI 10.1111/j.1948-7134.2014.12088.x
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWilke ABB, 2014, PARASITE VECTOR, V7, DOI 10.1186/s13071-014-0468-8
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCalle DA, 2002, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V97, P1191, DOI 10.1590/S0074-02762002000800021
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCartaxo MFS, 2011, T ROY SOC TROP MED H, V105, P491, DOI 10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.05.004
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCeretti W, 2015, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V31, P172, DOI 10.2987/14-6457R
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChaves LF, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P457, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02522.x
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChaves LF, 2010, Q REV BIOL, V85, P27, DOI 10.1086/650284
hcfmusp.relation.referenceConsoli R.A.G.B., 1994, PRINCIPAIS MOSQUITOS
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCornel A, 2012, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V28, P113, DOI 10.2987/8756-971X-28.4s.113
hcfmusp.relation.referencede Morais SA, 2010, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V105, P672, DOI 10.1590/S0074-02762010000500012
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDescloux E, 2012, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001470
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDibo MR, 2011, REV SOC BRAS MED TRO, V44, P496, DOI 10.1590/S0037-86822011000400019
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDujardin J, 2006, ENCY INFECT DIS, P433
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDujardin JP, 2008, INFECT GENET EVOL, V8, P875, DOI 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.07.011
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDujardin Jean-Pierre Al, 2010, BMC Res Notes, V3, P266, DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-3-266
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEastwood G, 2011, AM J TROP MED HYG, V85, P426, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0739
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFarajollahi A, 2011, INFECT GENET EVOL, V11, P1577, DOI 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.08.013
hcfmusp.relation.referenceForattini OP, 2002, CULICIDOLOGIA MED ID
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFruciano C, 2016, DEV GENES EVOL, V226, P139, DOI 10.1007/s00427-016-0537-4
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHAMMER O., 2001, PALAEONTOL ELECTRON, V4, P1, DOI 10.1016/J.BCP.2008.05.025
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHarbach RE, 2011, ACTA TROP, V120, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.06.005
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHarbach RE, 2012, ZOOL SCR, V41, P499, DOI 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2012.00546.x
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHarbach RE, 2013, MOSQUITO TAXONOMIC I
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHarbach RE, 1998, SYST ENTOMOL, V23, P327, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3113.1998.00072.x
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHarbach RE, 2005, SYST BIODIVERS, V3, P345, DOI 10.1017/5147720000500174X
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHenry A, 2010, INFECT GENET EVOL, V10, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.12.001
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHonorio NA, 2009, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V3, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000545
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJaramillo N, 2015, MED VET ENTOMOL, V29, P26, DOI 10.1111/mve.12091
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKlingenberg CP, 2011, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V11, P353, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLaurito M, 2013, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V108, P110, DOI 10.1590/0074-0276130457
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLaurito M, 2015, ZOOMORPHOLOGY, V134, P447, DOI 10.1007/s00435-015-0271-x
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLorenz C, 2012, PARASITE VECTOR, V5, DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-5-257
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLouise C, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0137851
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMayagaya VS, 2015, PARASITE VECTOR, V8, DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-0661-4
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMedeiros-Sousa AR, 2015, ACTA TROP, V150, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.08.002
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMedeiros-Sousa AR, 2013, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V29, P275, DOI 10.2987/12-6304R.1
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMotoki MT, 2012, INFECT GENET EVOL, V12, P1246, DOI 10.1016/j.meegid.2012.04.002
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMultini LC, 2015, PARASITE VECTOR, V8, DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-1256-9
hcfmusp.relation.referenceREINERT J. F., 2009, EUROPEAN MOSQUITO B, V27, P68
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRestrepo AC, 2014, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V19, P863, DOI 10.1111/tmi.12325
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRohlf FJ., 2008, TPSDIG DIGITIZE LAND
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSang SW, 2015, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003808
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDo TTT, 2014, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1078
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTipayamongkholgul M, 2009, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-9-422
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVidal PO, 2011, REV BRAS ENTOMOL, V55, P134, DOI 10.1590/S0085-56262011000100022
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVidal PO, 2012, INFECT GENET EVOL, V12, P591, DOI 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.11.013
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVirginio F, 2015, PARASITE VECTOR, V8, DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-0769-6
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWorld Health Organization, 2010, GLOB PROGR EL LYMPH
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWorld Health Organization, 2015, NATURE
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWorld Health Organization, 2012, DENG SEV DENG WHO FA
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWHO, 2013, WORLD MALARIA REPORT 2013, P1
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWilkerson RC, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0133602
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-05-17
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
art_WILKE_Morphometric_Wing_Characters_as_a_Tool_for_Mosquito_2016.PDF
Tamanho:
1.68 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
publishedVersion (English)