Prognostic Models in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorVIEIRA, Rita de Cassia Almeida
dc.contributor.authorSILVEIRA, Juliana Cristina Pereira
dc.contributor.authorPAIVA, Wellingson Silva
dc.contributor.authorOLIVEIRA, Daniel Vieira de
dc.contributor.authorSOUZA, Camila Pedroso Estevam de
dc.contributor.authorSANTANA-SANTOS, Eduesley
dc.contributor.authorSOUSA, Regina Marcia Cardoso de
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-21T13:30:14Z
dc.date.available2022-12-21T13:30:14Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThis review aimed to analyze the results of investigations that performed external validation or that compared prognostic models to identify the models and their variations that showed the best performance in predicting mortality, survival, and unfavorable outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Google Scholar, TROVE, and Open Grey databases were searched. A total of 1616 studies were identified and screened, and 15 studies were subsequently included for analysis after applying the selection criteria. The Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury (CRASH) and International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) models were the most externally validated among studies of severe traumatic brain injury. The results of the review showed that most publications encountered an area under the curve >= 0.70. The area under the curve meta-analysis showed similarity between the CRASH and IMPACT models and their variations for predicting mortality and unfavorable outcomes. Calibration results showed that the variations of CRASH and IMPACT models demonstrated adequate calibration in most studies for both outcomes, but without a clear indication of uncertainties in the evaluations of these models. Based on the results of this meta-analysis, the choice of prognostic models for clinical application may depend on the availability of predictors, characteristics of the population, and trauma care services.eng
dc.description.indexMEDLINEeng
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (Brasil) [001]
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
dc.identifier.citationNEUROCRITICAL CARE, v.37, n.3, p.790-805, 2022
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12028-022-01547-7
dc.identifier.eissn1556-0961
dc.identifier.issn1541-6933
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/50814
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherHUMANA PRESS INCeng
dc.relation.ispartofNeurocritical Care
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesseng
dc.rights.holderCopyright HUMANA PRESS INCeng
dc.subjectBrain injuryeng
dc.subjectOutcome assessmenteng
dc.subjectPredictive modelingeng
dc.subjectPrognostic modelingeng
dc.subject.othersevere head-injuryeng
dc.subject.otherexternal validationeng
dc.subject.otherinternational missioneng
dc.subject.otherclinical-trialseng
dc.subject.otherprediction modelseng
dc.subject.otherimpact modelseng
dc.subject.othercrasheng
dc.subject.othermortalityeng
dc.subject.otherrandomizationeng
dc.subject.otherscoreeng
dc.subject.wosCritical Care Medicineeng
dc.subject.wosClinical Neurologyeng
dc.titlePrognostic Models in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysiseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.categoryrevieweng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
dspace.entity.typePublication
hcfmusp.affiliation.countryCanadá
hcfmusp.affiliation.countryisoca
hcfmusp.author.externalVIEIRA, Rita de Cassia Almeida:CAPES Fdn, Minist Educ, Brasilia, DF, Brazil; Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Nursing, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Univ Sergipe, Nursing Postgrad Program, Sao Cristovao, Sergipe, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalSILVEIRA, Juliana Cristina Pereira:CAPES Fdn, Minist Educ, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalSOUZA, Camila Pedroso Estevam de:Univ Western Ontario, Dept Stat & Actuarial Sci, London, ON, Canada
hcfmusp.author.externalSANTANA-SANTOS, Eduesley:Univ Sergipe, Nursing Postgrad Program, Sao Cristovao, Sergipe, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalSOUSA, Regina Marcia Cardoso de:CAPES Fdn, Minist Educ, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
hcfmusp.citation.scopus7
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcWELLINGSON SILVA PAIVA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcDANIEL VIEIRA DE OLIVEIRA
hcfmusp.description.beginpage790
hcfmusp.description.endpage805
hcfmusp.description.issue3
hcfmusp.description.volume37
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.pubmed35941405
hcfmusp.origem.scopus2-s2.0-85135581428
hcfmusp.origem.wosWOS:000837590400002
hcfmusp.publisher.cityTOTOWAeng
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSAeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAlba AC, 2017, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V318, P1377, DOI 10.1001/jama.2017.12126eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBaztan JJ, 2017, GERIATR GERONTOL INT, V17, P664, DOI 10.1111/ggi.12925eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBOYD CR, 1987, J TRAUMA, V27, P370, DOI 10.1097/00005373-198704000-00005eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCapizzi A, 2020, MED CLIN N AM, V104, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.11.001eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCHAMPION HR, 1989, J TRAUMA, V29, P623, DOI 10.1097/00005373-198905000-00017eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCHAMPION HR, 1990, J TRAUMA, V30, P1356, DOI 10.1097/00005373-199011000-00008eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCharry JD, 2017, WORLD NEUROSURG, V101, P554, DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.051eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCollins GS, 2015, CIRCULATION, V131, P211, DOI [10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025, 10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014508, 10.7326/M14-0698, 10.1002/bjs.9736, 10.1136/bmj.g7594]eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCremer OL, 2006, J TRAUMA, V61, P1484, DOI 10.1097/01.ta.0000195981.63776.baeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCrowson CS, 2016, STAT METHODS MED RES, V25, P1692, DOI 10.1177/0962280213497434eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDebray TPA, 2019, STAT METHODS MED RES, V28, P2768, DOI 10.1177/0962280218785504eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDebray TPA, 2017, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V356, DOI 10.1136/bmj.i6460eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDijkland SA, 2021, J NEUROTRAUM, V38, P1377, DOI 10.1089/neu.2020.7300eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDijkland SA, 2019, J NEUROTRAUM, DOI 10.1089/neu.2019.6401eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDomingues Cristiane de Alencar, 2011, Rev. esc. enferm. USP, V45, P1353eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDullaert M, 2020, WORLD NEUROSURG, V137, pE159, DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.118eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFischler L, 2007, EUR J ANAESTH, V24, P676, DOI 10.1017/S026502150700021Xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGomez PA, 2014, J NEUROSURG, V121, P1314, DOI 10.3171/2014.7.JNS131874eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHan JL, 2014, J NEUROTRAUM, V31, P1146, DOI 10.1089/neu.2013.3003eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHelmrich IRAR, 2021, J NEUROTRAUM, V38, P2502, DOI 10.1089/neu.2019.6708eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLetsinger J, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0183552eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMaeda Y, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0221791eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMoher David, 2009, Open Med, V3, pe123eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNajem D, 2018, BIOCHEM CELL BIOL, V96, P391, DOI 10.1139/bcb-2016-0160eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceOlivecrona M, 2013, J CLIN NEUROSCI, V20, P996, DOI 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.09.015eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceOlivecrona M, 2012, ACTA NEUROCHIR, V154, P1567, DOI 10.1007/s00701-012-1351-zeng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePAGE MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [DOI 10.1136/BMJ.N71, 10.1136/bmj.n160, DOI 10.1136/BMJ.N160]eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePanczykowski DM, 2012, J NEUROTRAUM, V29, P47, DOI 10.1089/neu.2010.1482eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePargaonkar R, 2019, J CLIN NEUROSCI, V66, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.05.011eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePerel P, 2008, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V336, P425, DOI 10.1136/bmj.39461.643438.25eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePerel Pablo, 2006, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, V6, P38, DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-6-38eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRoozenbeek B, 2012, CRIT CARE MED, V40, P1609, DOI 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824519ceeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRoozenbeek B, 2012, J NEUROTRAUM, V29, P1306, DOI 10.1089/neu.2011.1988eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRuscio J, 2008, PSYCHOL METHODS, V13, P19, DOI 10.1037/1082-989X.13.1.19eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSandsmark DK, 2016, CURR NEUROL NEUROSCI, V16, DOI 10.1007/s11910-016-0654-5eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSteyerberg EW, 2008, PLOS MED, V5, P1251, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050165eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSun H, 2016, J NEUROTRAUM, V33, P1535, DOI 10.1089/neu.2015.4164eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTohira H, 2012, SCAND J TRAUMA RESUS, V20, DOI 10.1186/1757-7241-20-63eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencevan Calster B, 2019, BMC MED, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12916-019-1466-7eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVergouwe Y, 2005, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V58, P475, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.017eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWan XY, 2017, WORLD NEUROSURG, V103, P584, DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.069eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWolff RF, 2019, ANN INTERN MED, V170, P51, DOI 10.7326/M18-1376eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWongchareon K, 2020, INJURY PREV, V26, P546, DOI 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043466eng
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-05-17
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb0c9118e-a4e8-4a25-91f1-ed0445ced2bd
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationeb6ab5fb-3d41-4db0-9330-82749ef1cab1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb0c9118e-a4e8-4a25-91f1-ed0445ced2bd
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
art_VIEIRA_Prognostic_Models_in_Severe_Traumatic_Brain_Injury_A_2022.PDF
Tamanho:
1.2 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
publishedVersion (English)
Baixar
Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/45