The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_PAI_The_Combined_Use_of_Transcranial_Direct_Current_Stimulation_2018.PDF (840.9 KB)
art_PAI_The_Combined_Use_of_Transcranial_Direct_Current_Stimulation_2018.mp4 (128 MB)
Citações na Scopus
3
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
Autores
FREGNI, Felipe
Citação
JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, n.139, article ID e58495, 11p, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Neurologic disorders such as stroke and cerebral palsy are leading causes of long-term disability and can lead to severe incapacity and restriction of daily activities due to lower and upper limb impairments. Intensive physical and occupational therapy are still considered main treatments, but new adjunct therapies to standard rehabilitation that may optimize functional outcomes are being studied. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that polarizes underlying brain regions through the application of weak direct currents through electrodes on the scalp, modulating cortical excitability. Increased interest in this technique can be attributed to its low cost, ease of use, and effects on human neural plasticity. Recent research has been performed to determine the clinical potential of tDCS in diverse conditions such as depression, Parkinson's disease, and motor rehabilitation after stroke. tDCS helps enhance brain plasticity and seems to be a promising technique in rehabilitation programs. A number of robotic devices have been developed to assist in the rehabilitation of upper limb function after stroke. The rehabilitation of motor deficits is often a long process requiring multidisciplinary approaches for a patient to achieve maximum independence. These devices do not intend to replace manual rehabilitation therapy; instead, they were designed as an additional tool to rehabilitation programs, allowing immediate perception of results and tracking of improvements, thus helping patients to stay motivated. Both tDSC and robot-assisted therapy are promising add-ons to stroke rehabilitation and target the modulation of brain plasticity, with several reports describing their use to be associated with conventional therapy and the improvement of therapeutic outcomes. However, more recently, some small clinical trials have been developed that describe the associated use of tDCS and robot-assisted therapy in stroke rehabilitation. In this article, we describe the combined methods used in our institute for improving motor performance after stroke.
Palavras-chave
Neuroscience, Issue 139, Robotic rehabilitation, exoskeleton rehabilitation, neuromodulation, brain plasticity, noninvasive brain stimulation, physical therapy, neurologic rehabilitation
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/31165
Referências
  1. Adeyemo BO, 2012, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V3, P1
  2. Ang KK, 2015, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V96, pS79, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.08.008
  3. Antal A, 2007, EUR J NEUROSCI, V26, P2687, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05896.x
  4. Chang WH, 2013, J STROKE, V15, P174, DOI 10.5853/jos.2013.15.3.174
  5. DaSilva A. F, 2011, J VISUALIZED EXPT
  6. Edwards D. J., 2008, RESTORATIVE NEUROLOG, V27, P199
  7. Fregni F, 2005, NEUROREPORT, V16, P1551, DOI 10.1097/01.wnr.0000177010.44602.5e
  8. Fusco A, 2014, BIOMED RES INT, DOI 10.1155/2014/547290
  9. Giacobbe V, 2013, NEUROREHABILITATION, V33, P49, DOI 10.3233/NRE-130927
  10. Gilliaux M, 2015, NEUROREHAB NEURAL RE, V29, P183, DOI 10.1177/1545968314541172
  11. Hesse S, 2007, RESTOR NEUROL NEUROS, V25, P9
  12. Hesse S, 2001, NEUROREHABILITATION, V25, P838
  13. Hummel F, 2005, NEUROREHAB NEURAL RE, V19, P14, DOI 10.1177/1545968304272698
  14. Hummel FC, 2008, BRAIN STIMUL, V1, P370, DOI 10.1016/j.brs.2008.09.003
  15. Johansson BB, 2011, ACTA NEUROL SCAND, V123, P147, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01417.x
  16. Kim DY, 2010, AM J PHYS MED REHAB, V89, P879, DOI 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181f70aa7
  17. Kwakkel G, 2008, NEUROREHAB NEURAL RE, V22, P111, DOI 10.1177/1545968307305457
  18. Lindenberg R, 2010, NEUROLOGY, V75, P2176, DOI 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318202013a
  19. Lo AC, 2010, NEW ENGL J MED, V362, P1772, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa0911341
  20. Maciejasz P, 2014, J NEUROENG REHABIL, V11, DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-11-3
  21. Mehrholz J, 2012, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
  22. Miller EL, 2010, STROKE, V41, P2402, DOI 10.1161/STR.0b013e3181e7512b
  23. Nair DG, 2011, RESTOR NEUROL NEUROS, V29, P411, DOI 10.3233/RNN-2011-0612
  24. Nitsche MA, 2002, NERVENARZT, V73, P332, DOI 10.1007/s00115-002-1272-9
  25. Nitsche MA, 2000, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V527, P633, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x
  26. Nitsche MA, 2003, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V553, P293, DOI 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049916
  27. Ochi M, 2013, J REHABIL MED, V45, P137, DOI 10.2340/16501977-1099
  28. Timmermans AAA, 2014, J NEUROENG REHABIL, V11, DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-11-45
  29. Volpe BT, 2009, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V66, P1086, DOI 10.1001/archneurol.2009.182
  30. Volpe BT, 2000, NEUROLOGY, V54, P1938, DOI 10.1212/WNL.54.10.1938
  31. Williams JA, 2010, PHYS THER, V90, P398, DOI 10.2522/ptj.20090075
  32. Zimerman M, 2012, STROKE, V43, P2185, DOI 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645382

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MLS
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IMREA
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/40
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/03