Long-term follow-up after transoral outlet reduction following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: Back to stage 0?

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
Citação
ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, v.11, n.5, p.E538-E545, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background and study aims Significant weight regain affects up to one-third of patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and demands treatment. Transoral outlet reduction (TORe) with argon plasma coagulation (APC) alone or APC plus full-thickness suturing TORe (APC-FTS) is effective in the short term. However, no study has investigated the course of gastrojejunostomy (GJ) or quality of life (QOL) data after the first post-procedure year.Patients and methods Patients eligible for a 36-month follow-up visit after TORe underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with measurement of the GJ and answered QOL questionnaires (RAND-36). The primary aim was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of TORe, including weight loss, QOL, and GJ anastomosis (GJA) size. Comparisons between APC and APC-FTS TORe were a secondary aim.Results Among 39 eligible patients, 29 returned for the 3-year follow-up visit. There were no significant differences in demographics between APC and APC-FTS TORe groups. At 3 years, patients from both groups regained all the weight lost at 12 months, and the GJ diameter was similar to the pre-procedure assessment. As to QOL, most improvements seen at 12 months were lost at 3 years, returning to pre-procedure levels. Only the energy/fatigue domain improvement was kept between the 1- and 3-year visits.Conclusions Obesity is a chronic relapsing disease. Most effects of TORe are lost at 3 years, and redilation of the GJA occurs. Therefore, TORe should be considered iterative rather than a one-off procedure.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Abu Dayyeh B, 2017, OBES SURG, V27, P1031, DOI 10.1007/s11695-016-2418-3
  2. Abu Dayyeh BK, 2011, CLIN GASTROENTEROL H, V9, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.11.004
  3. Angrisani L, 2021, OBES SURG, V31, P1937, DOI 10.1007/s11695-020-05207-7
  4. Baretta GAP, 2015, OBES SURG, V25, P72, DOI 10.1007/s11695-014-1363-2
  5. Bauraite K, 2022, SURG ENDOSC, V36, P4333, DOI 10.1007/s00464-021-08778-3
  6. Brunaldi VO, 2020, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V92, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3757
  7. Brunaldi VO, 2018, OBES SURG, V28, P266, DOI 10.1007/s11695-017-2986-x
  8. Callahan ZM, 2020, SURG ENDOSC, V34, P2164, DOI 10.1007/s00464-019-07003-6
  9. Cambi MPC, 2021, OBES SURG, V31, P1290, DOI 10.1007/s11695-020-05164-1
  10. Carlsson LMS, 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, V383, P1535, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa2002449
  11. Chang TH, 2021, NUTRIENTS, V13, DOI 10.3390/nu13103668
  12. Cooper TC, 2015, OBES SURG, V25, P1474, DOI 10.1007/s11695-014-1560-z
  13. Eisenberg D, 2022, SURG OBES RELAT DIS, V18, P1345, DOI 10.1016/j.soard.2022.08.013
  14. Neto MG, 2022, OBES SURG, V32, P273, DOI 10.1007/s11695-021-05795-y
  15. Hays R D, 1993, Health Econ, V2, P217, DOI 10.1002/hec.4730020305
  16. Jaruvongvanich V, 2020, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V92, P1164, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.013
  17. Jirapinyo P, 2020, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V91, P1067, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.044
  18. Jirapinyo P, 2017, BMJ OPEN GASTROENTER, V4, DOI 10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000153
  19. Kumar N, 2016, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V83, P776, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.039
  20. Kuzminov A, 2016, OBES SURG, V26, P2237, DOI 10.1007/s11695-016-2252-7
  21. Moon RC, 2018, OBES SURG, V28, P2737, DOI 10.1007/s11695-018-3229-5
  22. Sampaio-Neto J, 2016, ABCD-ARQ BRAS CIR DI, V29, P12, DOI [10.1590/0102-6720201600S10004, 10.1590/0102-6720201600s10004]
  23. Smith C, 2011, SURG ENDOSC, V25, P2164, DOI 10.1007/s00464-010-1516-x
  24. Yanos BR, 2015, OBES SURG, V25, P1364, DOI 10.1007/s11695-014-1536-z
  25. Zeigler Z, 2021, CURR OBES REP, V10, P423, DOI 10.1007/s13679-021-00449-7