Central poststroke pain: somatosensory abnormalities and the presence of associated myofascial pain syndrome

dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorOLIVEIRA, Rogerio Adas Ayres de
dc.contributor.authorANDRADE, Daniel Ciampi de
dc.contributor.authorMACHADO, Andre Guelman Gomes
dc.contributor.authorTEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-30T15:08:17Z
dc.date.available2013-07-30T15:08:17Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractBackground: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a neuropathic pain syndrome associated with somatosensory abnormalities due to central nervous system lesion following a cerebrovascular insult. Post-stroke pain (PSP) refers to a broader range of clinical conditions leading to pain after stroke, but not restricted to CPSP, including other types of pain such as myofascial pain syndrome (MPS), painful shoulder, lumbar and dorsal pain, complex regional pain syndrome, and spasticity-related pain. Despite its recognition as part of the general PSP diagnostic possibilities, the prevalence of MPS has never been characterized in patients with CPSP patients. We performed a cross-sectional standardized clinical and radiological evaluation of patients with definite CPSP in order to assess the presence of other non-neuropathic pain syndromes, and in particular, the role of myofascial pain syndrome in these patients. Methods: CPSP patients underwent a standardized sensory and motor neurological evaluation, and were classified according to stroke mechanism, neurological deficits, presence and profile of MPS. The Visual Analogic Scale (VAS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and Beck Depression Scale (BDS) were filled out by all participants. Results: Forty CPSP patients were included. Thirty-six (90.0%) had one single ischemic stroke. Pain presented during the first three months after stroke in 75.0%. Median pain intensity was 10 (5 to 10). There was no difference in pain intensity among the different lesion site groups. Neuropathic pain was continuous-ongoing in 34 (85.0%) patients and intermittent in the remainder. Burning was the most common descriptor (70%). Main aggravating factors were contact to cold (62.5%). Thermo-sensory abnormalities were universal. MPS was diagnosed in 27 (67.5%) patients and was more common in the supratentorial extra-thalamic group (P <0.001). No significant differences were observed among the different stroke location groups and pain questionnaires and scales scores. Importantly, CPSP patients with and without MPS did not differ in pain intensity (VAS), MPQ or BDS scores. Conclusions: The presence of MPS is not an exception after stroke and may present in association with CPSP as a common comorbid condition. Further studies are necessary to clarify the role of MPS in CPSP.
dc.description.indexMEDLINE
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil (FMUSP)
dc.identifier.citationBMC NEUROLOGY, v.12, article ID 89, 8p, 2012
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2377-12-89
dc.identifier.issn1471-2377
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/754
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBIOMED CENTRAL LTD
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Neurology
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.holderCopyright BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
dc.subject.otherlong-term pain
dc.subject.othersensory abnormalities
dc.subject.otherstroke
dc.subject.otherdisease
dc.subject.otherlesions
dc.subject.othersystem
dc.subject.wosClinical Neurology
dc.titleCentral poststroke pain: somatosensory abnormalities and the presence of associated myofascial pain syndrome
dc.typearticle
dc.type.categoryoriginal article
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
hcfmusp.affiliation.countryEstados Unidos
hcfmusp.affiliation.countryisous
hcfmusp.author.externalMACHADO, Andre Guelman Gomes:Cleveland Clin Fdn, Funct Neurosurg Ctr Neurol Restorat, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
hcfmusp.citation.scopus37
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcROGERIO ADAS AYRES DE OLIVEIRA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcDANIEL CIAMPI ARAUJO DE ANDRADE
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcMANOEL JACOBSEN TEIXEIRA
hcfmusp.description.articlenumber89
hcfmusp.description.volume2012
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.pubmed22966989
hcfmusp.origem.scopus2-s2.0-84865980508
hcfmusp.origem.wosWOS:000310364700001
hcfmusp.publisher.cityLONDON
hcfmusp.publisher.countryENGLAND
hcfmusp.relation.referenceANDERSEN G, 1995, PAIN, V61, P187, DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00144-4
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBeck AT, 1993, BECK DEPRESSION INVE
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBLUMER D, 1982, J NERV MENT DIS, V170, P381, DOI 10.1097/00005053-198207000-00001
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBOGOUSSLAVSKY J, 1988, NEUROLOGY, V38, P837
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBOIVIE J, 1991, SYMP PAIN R, P65
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBOWSHER D, 1993, LANCET, V341, P156, DOI 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90015-9
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBowsher D, 1998, NEUROLOGY, V51, P1352
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDejerine J, 1906, REV NEUROL-FRANCE, V14, P521
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEdinger L, 1891, DTSCH Z NERVENHEILK, V1, P262, DOI 10.1007/BF01796578
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEisendrath SJ, 1995, NEUROLOGY, V45, pS26
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGerwin R D, 2001, Curr Pain Headache Rep, V5, P412, DOI 10.1007/s11916-001-0052-8
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGONZALES GR, 1994, NEUROLOGY, V44, pA318
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHaanpaa M, 2010, PAIN
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHead H, 1911, BRAIN, V34, P102, DOI 10.1093/brain/34.2-3.102
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHERRMANN M, 1995, STROKE, V26, P850
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHong JH, 2010, EUR NEUROL, V64, P163, DOI 10.1159/000319040
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJensen MP, 1992, HDB PAIN ASSESSMENT, P135
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKlit H, 2009, LANCET NEUROL, V8, P857, DOI 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70176-0
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKuptniratsaikul V, 2009, AM J PHYS MED REHAB, V88, P92, DOI 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181909d5f
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLEIJON G, 1989, PAIN, V36, P13, DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90107-3
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLin TY, 1997, PHYS MED REHABILITAT, V8, P207
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLOH L, 1981, BRIT MED J, V282, P1026
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMacGowan DJL, 1997, NEUROLOGY, V49, P120
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMELZACK R, 1975, PAIN, V1, P277, DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMODAN B, 1992, STROKE, V23, P1230
hcfmusp.relation.referencePimenta CAM, 1994, DOR CONCEITOS GERAIS, P46
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRoosink M, 2011, J PAIN, V12, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.10.009
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSchamahmann JD, 1992, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V49, P1032
hcfmusp.relation.referenceStaud R, 2009, PAIN, V145, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2009.05.020
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSTEINBROCKER O, 1947, AM J MED, V3, P402, DOI 10.1016/0002-9343(47)90170-8
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTravell JG, 1983, MYOFASCIAL PAIN DYSF
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTreede RD, 2008, NEUROLOGY, V70, P1630, DOI 10.1212/01.wnl.0000282763.29778.59
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTreede RD, 2008, EUR J PAIN, V12, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.11.008
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTuveson B, 2009, PAIN, V143, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2009.02.002
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVESTERGAARD K, 1995, PAIN, V61, P177, DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00140-A
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWidar M, 2002, SCAND J CARING SCI, V16, P302, DOI 10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00090.x
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWidar M, 2002, J REHABIL MED, V34, P165, DOI 10.1080/16501970213237
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipFMUSP
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-05-17
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf98f75ad-5c0d-4c78-b444-b8e8c2c8e954
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione1b0cddb-86b7-4984-897c-fc8b3ec37f08
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb665cf91-624e-4b90-92bc-9df755eeeaaf
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf98f75ad-5c0d-4c78-b444-b8e8c2c8e954
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
art_OLIVEIRA_Central_poststroke_pain_somatosensory_abnormalities_and_the_presence_2012_eng.PDF
Tamanho:
1.35 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
publishedVersion (English)