Cochlear implants and bacterial meningitis: a speech recognition study in paired samples

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorBRITO, Rubens de
dc.contributor.authorBITTENCOURT, Aline Gomes
dc.contributor.authorGOFFI-GOMEZ, Maria Valéria
dc.contributor.authorMAGALHÃES, Ana Tereza
dc.contributor.authorSAMUEL, Paola
dc.contributor.authorTSUJI, Robinson Koji
dc.contributor.authorBENTO, Ricardo Ferreira
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-03T20:48:55Z
dc.date.available2014-07-03T20:48:55Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Cochlear implants may guarantee sound perception and the ability to detect speech at a close-to-normal hearing intensity; however, differences have been observed among implantees in terms of performance on discrimination tests and speech recognition. OBJECTIVE: To identify whether patients with post-meningitis deafness perform similarly to patients with hearing loss due to other causes. METHOD: A retrospective clinical study involving post-lingual patients who had been using Nucleus-22 or Nucleus-24 cochlear implants for at least 1 year. These patients were matched with respect to age (± 2 years), time since the onset of deafness (± 1 year), and the duration of implant use with implant users who had hearing loss due to other causes. Speech perception was assessed using the Portuguese version of the Latin-American Protocol for the Evaluation of Cochlear Implants. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 52 individuals (26 in each of the 2 groups). The post-meningitic group had a median of 18.5 active electrodes. The group with hearing loss due to other causes had a median of 21, but no significant statistical difference was observed (p = 0.07). The results of closed- and open-set speech recognition tests showed great variability in speech recognition between the studied groups. These differences were more pronounced for the most difficult listening tasks, such as the medial consonant task (in the vowel-consonant-vowel format). CONCLUSION: Cochlear implant recipients with hearing loss due to bacterial meningitis, who had been using the device for 1 year performed more poorly on closed- and open-set speech recognition tests than did implant recipients with hearing loss due to other causes.
dc.description.indexSciELO
dc.identifier.citationINTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, v.17, n.1, p.57-61, 2013
dc.identifier.doi10.7162/S1809-97772013000100010
dc.identifier.issn1809-4864
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/5764
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFundação Otorrinolaringologia
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.holderCopyright Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
dc.subjectCochlear implants
dc.subjectSpeech perception
dc.subjectMeningitis
dc.subject.wosOtorhinolaryngology
dc.titleCochlear implants and bacterial meningitis: a speech recognition study in paired samples
dc.typearticle
dc.type.categoryoriginal article
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
hcfmusp.citation.scopus7
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcRUBENS VUONO DE BRITO NETO
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcALINE GOMES BITTENCOURT
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcMARIA VALERIA SCHMIDT GOFFI GOMEZ
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcANA TEREZA DE MATOS MAGALHAES
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcPAOLA ANGELICA SAMUEL SIERRA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcROBINSON KOJI TSUJI
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcRICARDO FERREIRA BENTO
hcfmusp.description.beginpage57
hcfmusp.description.endpage61
hcfmusp.description.issue1
hcfmusp.description.volume17
hcfmusp.origemSciELO
hcfmusp.origem.scieloSCIELO:S1809-48642013000100010
hcfmusp.origem.scopus2-s2.0-84876122387
hcfmusp.publisher.citySÃO PAULO
hcfmusp.publisher.countryBRAZIL
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBento RF, 2004, REV BRAS OTORRINOLAR, V70, P632, DOI 10.1590/S0034-72992004000500009
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBevilacqua MC, 2003, Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, V69, P760
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBlamey P, 1996, Audiol Neurootol, V1, P293
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDouglas Susan A, 2008, Cochlear Implants Int, V9, P90, DOI 10.1002/cii.344
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEl-Kashlan HK, 2003, OTOL NEUROTOL, V24, P596, DOI 10.1097/00129492-200307000-00011
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEshraghi AA, 2004, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V131, P885, DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.05.019
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFitzpatrick Elizabeth, 2006, BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord, V6, P7, DOI 10.1186/1472-6815-6-7
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFrancis HW, 2004, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V130, P604, DOI 10.1001/archotol.130.5.604
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFrancis HW, 2008, OTOL NEUROTOL, V29, P502, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318170b60b
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGoffi-Gomez MV, 2010, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V267, P515, DOI 10.1007/s00405-009-1092-7
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGomez MVSG, 2004, Arq Int Otorrinolaringol, V8, P303
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGrayeli AB, 2008, OTOL NEUROTOL, V29, P1140, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31818b6238
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGreen JD, 1991, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, V100, P712
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGuedes Mariana Cardoso, 2007, Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, V73, P439
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMacAndie C, 2000, Cochlear Implants Int, V1, P108, DOI 10.1002/cii.34
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMosnier I, 2006, Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac, V123, P71, DOI 10.1016/S0003-438X(06)76645-2
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNichani J, 2011, OTOL NEUROTOL, V32, P784, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31821677aa
hcfmusp.relation.referencePhilippon D, 2009, OTOL NEUROTOL, V31, P83
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRoukema BY, 2011, INT J OTOLARYNGOL, V2011, P845
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSanna M, 2006, LARYNGOSCOPE, V116, P1700, DOI 10.1097/01.mlg.0000231739.79208.97
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSridhar Divya, 2006, Audiol Neurootol, V11 Suppl 1, P16, DOI 10.1159/000095609
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSTEENERSON RL, 1990, AM J OTOL, V11, P360
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWellman MB, 2003, OTOL NEUROTOL, V24, P907, DOI 10.1097/00129492-200311000-00015
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-05-10
relation.isAuthorOfPublication29ad0ecc-40c0-46cd-beb0-3d7e742c8cd5
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb04ee4f1-4d41-4206-8fdb-822136f8b9cd
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1a1e6c11-aa81-457e-9c4f-0d4d381d93f4
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb922786c-18db-453f-b13b-1269c4f0b7d1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3a6f2dc2-f4f7-4287-b037-4d9e9c221e56
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfcdf0f3c-bbdc-419f-bfae-afc5510c98e9
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc9815ac5-c4c0-4a07-95b5-298f8fbf5284
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery29ad0ecc-40c0-46cd-beb0-3d7e742c8cd5
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
art_BRITO_Cochlear_implants_and_bacterial_meningitis_a_speech_recognition_2013.PDF
Tamanho:
515.02 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
publishedVersion (English)
Baixar
Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOF
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/32