Quantitative Postural Analysis of Children With Congenital Visual Impairment
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
6
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
MOSBY-ELSEVIER
Autores
Citação
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, v.41, n.1, p.62-70, 2018
Resumo
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the postural alignment of children with visual impairment with that of children without visual impairment. Methods: The sample studied was 74 children of both sexes ages 5 to 12 years. Of these, 34 had visual impairment and 40 were control children. Digital photos from the standing position were used to analyze posture. Postural variables, such as tilt of the head, shoulder position, scapula position, lateral deviation of the spine, ankle position in the frontal plane and head posture, angle of thoracic kyphosis, angle of lumbar lordosis, pelvis position, and knee position in the frontal and sagittal planes, were measured with the Postural Assessment Software 0.63, version 36 (SAPO, Sao Paulo, Brazil), with markers placed in predetermined bony landmarks. Results: The main results of this study showed that children with visual impairment have increased head tilt (P < .001), shoulder deviation in frontal plane (P = .004), lateral deviation of the spine (P < .001), changes in scapula position (P = .012), higher thoracic kyphosis (P = .004), and lower lumbar lordosis (P < .001). Conclusions: Visual impairment influences postural alignment. Children with visual impairment had increased head tilt, uneven shoulders, greater lateral deviation of the spine, thoracic kyphosis, lower lumbar lordosis, and more severe valgus deformities on knees.
Palavras-chave
Posture, Child, Visual Impairment
Referências
- Amaya JMM, 1991, ACTA PEDIAT MEX, V12, P136
- AULISA L, 1986, Italian Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, V12, P85
- Bouchard D, 2000, J VISUAL IMPAIR BLIN, V94, P564
- Catanzariti JF, 2001, SPINE, V26, P48, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200101010-00010
- Fedorak C, 2003, SPINE, V28, P1857, DOI 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083281.48923.BD
- Fernandez E, 1998, REV BRAS POSTURA MOV, V2, P5
- Ferreira EA, 2011, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V34, P371, DOI 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.05.018
- Gianini RJ, 2004, REV SAUDE PUBL, V38, P201, DOI 10.1590/s0034-89102004000200008
- Goltz HC, 1997, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V115, P748, DOI 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150750010
- Haddad MAO, 2007, J PEDIAT OPHTH STRAB, V44, P232
- HEATH CH, 1993, J PEDIATR ORTHOPED, V13, P259
- HIATT RL, 1978, ANN OPHTHALMOL, V10, P881
- Iunes DH, 2005, REV BRAS FISIOTER, V9, P327
- Kendall FP, 1995, MUSCULOS PROVAS FUNC
- KUSHNER BJ, 1979, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V86, P2115
- Lafond Danik, 2007, Chiropr Osteopat, V15, P1, DOI 10.1186/1746-1340-15-1
- Loder RT, 2001, J SPINAL DISORD, V14, P465, DOI 10.1097/00002517-200112000-00001
- Mascarenhas CHM, 2009, REV ESPACO SAUDE, V11, P1
- Matsumoto T, 1997, J SPINAL DISORD, V10, P125
- Nucci P, 2005, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V140, P65
- Penha Patrícia Jundi, 2005, Clinics, V60, P9, DOI 10.1590/S1807-59322005000100004
- Penha PJ, 2009, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V32, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.12.009
- Penha PJ., 2007, THESIS
- Raine S, 1997, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V78, P1215, DOI 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90335-X
- Sanchez HM, 2008, FISIOTER MOV, V21, P11
- Santiago A P, 1998, J AAPOS, V2, P5, DOI 10.1016/S1091-8531(98)90103-3
- Schmid M, 2007, BRAIN, V130, P2097, DOI 10.1093/brain/awm157
- Tesch CB, 2004, AVALIACAO FOTOMETRIC
- Wahlund K, 1998, J OROFAC PAIN, V12, P42
- Watson AWS, 2000, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V40, P260
- Watson AWS, 1998, REV FISIOTER U SAO P, V5, P20
- Weir CJ, 2006, STAT MED, V25, P183, DOI 10.1002/sim.2319
- World Health Organization, 2009, ACT PLAN PREV AV BLI
- WILLNER S, 1981, ACTA ORTHOP SCAND, V52, P525, DOI 10.3109/17453678108992142