Quality of life of pediatric patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction and their caregivers

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
14
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2011
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER
Citação
PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, v.26, n.4, p.571-577, 2011
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
The interest in quality of life (QoL) studies has increased as they are useful instruments to evaluate and compare medical care delivery and the impact of health interventions. The perception of QoL differs among individuals. Its characterization is especially difficult in the pediatric age group as each developmental stage presents specific demands. The prevalence of congenital lower urinary dysfunction is high and their management changes the daily routine of the patients and their families. In a cross-sectional study, we evaluated the QoL of 28 children and adolescents with urinary malformations and their caregivers using the Autoquestionnaire Qualit, de Vie Enfant Imag, (AUQUEI) and Short-Form 36 (SF-36), respectively, and compared the results with 38 healthy control age-paired children/caregivers. Four questions were added to patients' questionnaire to evaluate issues related to their urological management. Our results show lower AUQUEI total scoring in the patients' group (p < 0.0213, Fisher's exact test), who also present problems in dealing with social aspects, such as being at classroom, manifest negative feelings in relation to diurnal urinary losses but seem to be well adapted to intermittent urethral catheterization. A tendency for worse QoL scores in the patients' group caregivers was detected in the SF-36 pain and physical limitation domains.
Palavras-chave
Quality of life, Child, Adolescent, Stoma, Catheterization, Caregiver, Lower urinary tract dysfunction
Referências
  1. Ravens-Sieberer U, 1998, QUAL LIFE RES, V7, P399, DOI 10.1023/A:1008853819715
  2. Abd-El-Gawad G, 2002, SCAND J UROL NEPHROL, V36, P40, DOI 10.1080/003655902317259355
  3. Rosenbaum P, 2008, ARCH DIS CHILD, V93, P100, DOI 10.1136/adc.2007.132167
  4. Wallander JL, 2001, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V57, P571, DOI 10.1002/jclp.1029
  5. Pais-Ribeiro JL, 2004, CLIN NUTR, V23, P121, DOI 10.1016/S0261-5614(03)00109-2
  6. Goldbeck L, 2005, QUAL LIFE RES, V14, P1915, DOI 10.1007/s11136-005-4327-0
  7. Assumpcao FB, 2000, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V58, P119, DOI 10.1590/S0004-282X2000000100018
  8. Bower WF, 2006, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V25, P221, DOI 10.1002/nau.20171
  9. Ciconelli RM, 1999, REV BRAS REUMATOL, V39, P143
  10. Gladh G, 2006, ACTA PAEDIATR, V95, P1648, DOI 10.1080/08035250600752458
  11. HERRERA SEM, 2004, AV ENFERM, V22, P39
  12. KUCZYNSKI E, 2008, REV BRAS PSIQUIATR, V30, P399
  13. MacDonagh R, 1996, BRIT J UROL, V78, P485, DOI 10.1046/j.1464-410X.1996.01071.x
  14. MAGNIFICAT S, 1997, NEUROPYCHHIATR ENFAN, V45, P6
  15. Merencla LA, 2007, J SPINAL CORD MED, V30, pS41
  16. Orley J, 1994, QUALITY LIFE ASSESSM
  17. Schast Aileen P, 2008, J Pediatr Urol, V4, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.10.007
  18. Stjernqvist K, 1999, J UROLOGY, V162, P2125, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68139-6
  19. TOBITO AM, 2008, REPERT MED CIR, V17, P54