Simulation-Based Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshops: A Reproducible Model for Sustainable Education

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
7
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2020
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ALLIANCE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP DIVISION ALLEN PRESS
Autores
KANTAR, Rami S.
BREUGEM, Corstiaan C.
KEITH, Kristen
KASSAM, Serena
VIJAYAKUMAR, Charanya
BOW, Mikaela
ALFONSO, Allyson R.
CHAHINE, Elsa M.
GHOTMI, Lilian H.
PATEL, Krishna G.
Citação
CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, v.57, n.10, p.1238-1246, 2020
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: Evaluate simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops as a reproducible model for education with sustained impact. Design: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. Setting: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Participants: Total of 180 participants. Interventions: Three-day simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Main Outcome Measures: Number of workshop participants stratified by specialty, satisfaction with the workshop, satisfaction with simulation-based workshops as educational tools, impact on cleft surgery procedural confidence, short-term impact on clinical practice, medium-term impact on clinical practice. Results: The workshop included 180 participants from 5 continents. The response rate was 54.5%, with participants reporting high satisfaction with all aspects of the workshop and with simulation-based workshops as educational tools. Participants reported a significant improvement in cleft lip (33.3 +/- 5.7 vs 25.7 +/- 7.6;P< .001) and palate (32.4 +/- 7.1 vs 23.7 +/- 6.6;P< .001) surgery procedural confidence following the simulation sessions. Participants also reported a positive short-term and medium-term impact on their clinical practices. Conclusion: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops are well received by participants, lead to improved cleft surgery procedural confidence, and have a sustained positive impact on participants' clinical practices. Future efforts should focus on evaluating and quantifying this perceived positive impact, as well reproducing these efforts in other areas of need.
Palavras-chave
ethics, health policies, oral health, palatoplasty, lip form, lip function
Referências
  1. American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, 1993, CLEFT PALATE CRAN S1, V30, pS1
  2. Beaubien JM, 2004, QUAL SAF HEALTH CARE, V13, pI51, DOI 10.1136/qshc.2004.009845
  3. Diaz-Siso JR, 2016, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V138, p730E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002558
  4. Geoffrion R, 2013, J OBSTET GYNAECOL CA, V35, P355, DOI 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30964-6
  5. Kantar RS, 2019, PRS-GLOB OPEN, V7, DOI 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002438
  6. Kantar RS, 2020, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V145, p184E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006375
  7. Kantar RS, 2019, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V143, P1165, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005416
  8. Kantar RS, 2019, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V56, P735, DOI 10.1177/1055665618810574
  9. Kantar RS, 2018, J SURG EDUC, V75, P1120, DOI 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.12.003
  10. Mars M, 2008, MANAGEMENT CLEFT LIP, P1
  11. MARSH HW, 1982, BRIT J EDUC PSYCHOL, V52, P77, DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1982.tb02505.x
  12. Massenburg BB, 2016, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V27, P1741, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003038
  13. Meara JG, 2015, LANCET, V386, P569, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60160-X
  14. Plana NM, 2019, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V143, P202, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005093
  15. Podolsky DJ, 2018, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V141, P1485, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004426
  16. Podolsky DJ, 2017, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V139, p85E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002923
  17. Rosen JM, 2009, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V123, P729, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181958ec4
  18. Selzer DJ, 2013, ANN SURG, V257, P594, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182894756
  19. Shkoukani MA, 2013, FRONT PEDIATR, V1, DOI 10.3389/fped.2013.00053