Distinct patterns of metabolic motor cortex activity for phantom and residual limb pain in people with amputations: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study

Background: Phantom pain limb (PLP) has gained more attention due to the large number of people with amputations around the world and growing knowledge of the pain process, although its mechanisms are not completely understood. Objectives: The aim of this study was to understand, in patients with amputations, the association between PLP and residual limb pain (RLP), and the brain metabolic response in cortical motor circuits, using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Methods: Sixty participants were recruited from the rehabilitation program in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Included patients were aged over 18 years, with traumatic unilateral lower-limb amputation, with PLP for at least 3 months after full recovery from amputation surgery. PLP and RLP levels were measured using visual analogue scales. fNIRS was performed during motor execution and motor mirror tasks for 20 s. In order to highlight possible variables related to variation in pain measures, univariate linear regression analyses were performed for both experimental conditions, resulting in four fNIRS variables (two hemispheres x two experimental conditions). Later, in order to test the topographic specificity of the models, eight multivariate regression analyses were performed (two pain scales x two experimental conditions x two hemispheres), including the primary motor cortex (PMC) related channel as an independent variable as well as five other channels related to the premotor area, supplementary area, and somatosensory cortex. All models were controlled for age, sex, ethnicity, and education. Results: We found that: i) there is an asymmetric metabolic activation during motor execution and mirror task between hemispheres (with a predominance that is ipsilateral to the amputated limb), ii) increased metabolic response in the PMC ipsilateral to the amputation is associated with increased PLP (during both experimental tasks), while increased metabolic response in the contralateral PMC is associated with increased RLP (during the mirror motor task only); ii) increased metabolic activity of the ipsilateral premotor region is associated with increased PLP during the motor mirror task; iii) RLP was only associated with higher metabolic activity in the contralateral PMC and lower metabolic activity in the ipsilateral inferior frontal region during motor mirror task, but PLP was associated with higher metabolic activity during both tasks. Conclusion: These results suggest there is both task and region specificity for the association between the brain metabolic response and the two different types of post-amputation pain. The metabolic predominance that is ipsilateral to the amputated limb during both tasks was associated with higher levels of PLP, suggesting a cortical motor network activity imbalance due to potential interhemispheric compensatory mechanisms. The present work contributes to the understanding of the underlying topographical patterns in the motor-related circuits associated with pain after amputations.

Palavras-chave

fNIRS, Mirror therapy, Motor cortex, Phantom limb pain, Rehabilitation, Residual limb pain

URI

https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/58903

Referências

Andoh J, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-68206-9
[Anonymous], 1964, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V2, P177
Arun KM, 2020, BRAIN TOPOGR, V33, P710, DOI 10.1007/s10548-020-00785-2
Barbosa SP, 2021, Princ Pract Clin Res J, V7, P50
Barone J, 2021, FRONT SYST NEUROSCI, V15, DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2021.655886
Berlot E, 2019, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V121, P418, DOI 10.1152/jn.00439.2018
Browne JD, 2022, BRAIN BEHAV, V12, DOI 10.1002/brb3.2509
Chen WL, 2020, FRONT NEUROSCI-SWITZ, V14, DOI 10.3389/fnins.2020.00724
Duarte D, 2020, PSYCHIAT RES-NEUROIM, V304, DOI 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111151
Flor H, 2002, LANCET NEUROL, V1, P182, DOI 10.1016/S1474-4422(02)00074-1
Gan Z, 2022, SCIENCE, V378, P1336, DOI 10.1126/science.add4391
Gunduz ME, 2021, NEUROREHAB NEURAL RE, V35, P704, DOI 10.1177/15459683211017509
Gunduz ME, 2020, FRONT NEUROSCI-SWITZ, V14, DOI 10.3389/fnins.2020.00314
Hall M, 2021, PAIN MED, V22, P1399, DOI 10.1093/pm/pnaa453
Hanyu-Deutmeyer AA, 2023, Phantom limb pain
Herold F, 2018, J CLIN MED, V7, DOI 10.3390/jcm7120466
Hu XS, 2021, PAIN, V162, P2805, DOI 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002293
Karunakaran KD, 2021, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V120, P335, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.023
Kikkert S, 2018, CORTEX, V106, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.013
Kucyi A, 2015, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V38, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.tins.2014.11.006
Liao LD, 2013, BIOMED ENG ONLINE, V12, DOI 10.1186/1475-925X-12-38
Makin TR, 2013, NAT COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1038/ncomms2571
Marques LM, 2022, NEUROPHYSIOL CLIN, V52, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.neucli.2022.09.006
Marques LM, 2023, SOMATOSENS MOT RES, DOI 10.1080/08990220.2023.2188926
Münger M, 2020, PAIN PRACT, V20, P578, DOI 10.1111/papr.12881
Osborne JW., 2019, Practical Assessment, Research Evaluation, V8, DOI [10.7275/r222-hv23, DOI 10.7275/R222-HV23]
Pacheco-Barrios K, 2020, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V131, P2375, DOI 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.06.024
Pacheco-Barrios K, 2020, PAIN MED, V21, P2310, DOI 10.1093/pm/pnaa039
Pinto CB, 2016, JMIR RES PROTOC, V5, P104, DOI 10.2196/resprot.5645
Raffin E, 2012, CORTEX, V48, P746, DOI 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.003
Sugawara AT, 2021, PAIN RES MANAG, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/2706731
Suso-Marti L, 2020, EUR J PAIN, V24, P886, DOI 10.1002/ejp.1540
Yücel MA, 2015, SCI REP-UK, V5, DOI 10.1038/srep09469
Morais GAZ, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-21716-z

Coleções

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MLS

Página do item completo