Posture Alignment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Photogrammetry in Scoliosis School Screening

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_PENHA_Posture_Alignment_of_Adolescent_Idiopathic_Scoliosis_Photogrammetry_in_2017.PDF (1.16 MB)
Citações na Scopus
17
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
MOSBY-ELSEVIER
Autores
PENHA, Narima Livia Jundi
CARVALHO, Goncalves De
ANDRADE, Rodrigo Mantelatto
Citação
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, v.40, n.6, p.441-451, 2017
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the posture patterns of adolescents diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in a scoliosis school screening (SSS). Methods: Two-dimensional photogrammetry was used to assess the posture of 37 adolescents diagnosed with scoliosis (scoliosis group, SG) (Cobb angle >= 10 degrees) and 76 adolescents with a false positive diagnosis (false positive group, FPG) (Cobb angle <10 degrees, angle of trunk rotation >= 7 degrees). In total, 2562 10-to 14-year-old adolescents were enrolled in the SSS, which was performed in public schools in the cities of Amparo, Pedreira, and Mogi Mirimin the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Their posture was analyzed using Postural Analysis Software. Continuous variables were tested using Student t test, and categorical variableswere tested using a chi(2) test. The SG, FPG, simple curve group, and double curve groupwere all compared. Bivariate analysis was used to identify associations between postural deviations and scoliosis. The adopted significance level was alpha = .05. Results: The SG (2.7 +/- 1.9 degrees) had greater shoulder obliquity than the FPG (1.9 +/- 1.4 degrees) (P = .010), and this deviation was associated with scoliosis (odds ratio [95% CI] P = 1.4 [1.1-1.8] 0.011). The SG had asymmetry between the right-and left-side lower limb frontal angle, shoulder sagittal alignment, and knee angle. The double curve group (3 +/- 1.7 degrees) presented a greater value of the vertical alignment of the torso than the simple curve group did (1.9 +/- 1 degrees; P = .032). Conclusions: Adolescents diagnosed with AIS in an SSS had greater shoulder obliquity and asymmetry between the right and left sides. Shoulder obliquity was the only postural deviation associated with AIS.
Palavras-chave
Posture, Adolescent, Scoliosis, Mass Screening
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/24265
Referências
  1. AMENDT LE, 1990, PHYS THER, V70, P108
  2. BUNNELL WP, 1984, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V66A, P1381
  3. Chow DHK, 2006, GAIT POSTURE, V24, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.08.007
  4. Danielsson AJ, 2006, SPINE, V31, P275, DOI 10.1097/01.brs.0000197652.52890.71
  5. de la Huerta E, 1998, ANN CHIR, V52, P776
  6. Espírito Santo Alcebíades do, 2011, Rev. bras. epidemiol., V14, P347, DOI 10.1590/S1415-790X2011000200015
  7. Ferreira EA, 2011, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V34, P371, DOI 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.05.018
  8. Ferreira EAG, 2010, CLINICS, V65, P675, DOI 10.1590/S1807-59322010000700005
  9. Fortin C, 2012, PHYSIOTHERAPY, V98, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.physio.2010.12.006
  10. Fortin C, 2011, DISABIL REHABIL, V33, P367, DOI 10.3109/09638288.2010.492066
  11. Furlanetto Tassia Silveira, 2016, World J Orthop, V7, P136, DOI 10.5312/wjo.v7.i2.136
  12. Glinkowski W, 2014, TELEMED E-HEALTH, V20, P11, DOI 10.1089/tmj.2013.0107
  13. GRIVAS TB, 2007, SCOLIOSIS SPINAL DIS, V2
  14. Kouwenhoven JWM, 2008, SPINE, V33, P2898, DOI 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181891751
  15. Lafond Danik, 2007, Chiropr Osteopat, V15, P1, DOI 10.1186/1746-1340-15-1
  16. Leal JS, 2006, REV BRAS ORTOP, V41, P309
  17. LeBlanc R, 1996, ANN CHIR, V50, P631
  18. Mahaudens Philippe, 2005, Spine J, V5, P427
  19. Masso PD, 2000, SPINE, V25, P457, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200002150-00011
  20. Michonski J, 2012, J BIOMED OPT, V17, DOI 10.1117/1.JBO.17.5.056015
  21. Neumann DA., 2010, KINESIOLOGY MUSCULOS
  22. Patias P, 2010, SCOLIOSIS SPINAL DIS, V5, DOI 10.1186/1748-7161-5-12
  23. Penha PJ, 2008, REV BRAS FISIOTER, V12, P386, DOI 10.1590/S1413-35552008000500008
  24. Penha PJ, 2009, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V32, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.12.009
  25. Penha PJ., 2007, THESIS
  26. Peterson DE, 1997, J ORTHOP SPORT PHYS, V25, P34
  27. Saad KR, 2012, J BODYW MOV THER, V16, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.jbmt.2011.03.005
  28. STOKES IAF, 1987, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V69A, P203
  29. Stylianides GA, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0070205
  30. Watson AWS, 2000, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V40, P260
  31. Zabjek KF, 2008, J PEDIATR ORTHOPED, V28, P218, DOI 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181651bdc
  32. Zabjek KF, 2005, CLIN BIOMECH, V20, P483, DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.01.003
  33. Zabjek KF, 1999, ANN CHIR, V53, P751

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MFT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/34