Analysis of possible factors of vocal interference during the teaching activity
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
13
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA
Citação
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, v.51, article ID 124, 10p, 2017
Resumo
OBJECTIVE: To measure the risk of dysphonia in teachers, as well as investigate whether the perceptual-auditory and acoustic aspects of the voice of teachers in situations of silence and noise, the signal-to-noise ratio, and the noise levels in the classroom are associated with the presence of dysphonia. METHODS: This is an observational cross-sectional research with 23 primary and secondary school teachers from a private school in the municipality of Sao Paulo, Brazil, divided into the groups without dysphonia and with dysphonia. We performed the following procedures: general Dysphonia Risk Screening Protocol (General-DRSP) and complementary to speaking voice teacher (Specific-DRSP), voice recording during class and in an individual situation in a silent room, and measurement of the signal-to-noise ratio and noise levels of classrooms. RESULTS: We have found differences between groups regarding physical activity (General-DRSP) and particularities of the profession (Specific-DRSP), as well as in all aspects of the perceptualauditory vocal analysis. We have found signs of voice wear in the group without dysphonia. Regarding the vocal resources in the situations of noise and silence, we have identified a difference for the production of abrupt vocal attack and the tendency of a more precise speech in the situation of noise. Both the signal-to-noise ratio and the room noise levels during class were high in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Teachers in both groups are at high risk for developing dysphonia and have negative vocal signals to a greater or lesser extent. Signal-to-noise ratio was inadequate in most classrooms, considering the standards for both children with normal hearing and with hearing loss, as well as equivalent noise levels.
Palavras-chave
School Teachers, Voice Disorders, epidemiology, Noise, adverse effects, Hearing Loss, Risk Factors, Working Conditions
Referências
- Bassi IB, 2011, DISTURB COMUM, V23, P173
- Behlau M, 2012, J VOICE, V26
- Behlau M, 2001, VOZ LIVRO ESPECIALIS, V1, P91
- Bentler R A, 2000, Am J Audiol, V9, P84, DOI 10.1044/1059-0889(2000/010)
- Biserra MP, 2014, SAUDE SOC-SAO PAULO, V23, P966, DOI 10.1590/S0104-12902014000300019
- Chen SH, 2010, J VOICE, V24, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.07.008
- Cutiva LCC, 2013, J COMMUN DISORD, V46, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.01.001
- de Medeiros AM, 2008, J VOICE, V22, P676, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.03.008
- de Mello MT, 2013, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V149, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.035
- Pereira LPD, 2015, REV SAUDE PUBL, V49, DOI 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005716
- de Souza CL, 2011, REV SAUDE PUBL, V45, P914, DOI 10.1590/S0034-89102011005000055
- Feijo D, 2003, FONOAUDIOLOGIA TELEJ, P75
- Houtte V, 2011, J VOICE, V25, P571
- Libardi A, 2006, DISTURB COMUN, V18, P167
- Martins Priscila Campos, 2015, CoDAS, V27, P279, DOI 10.1590/2317-1782/20152014167
- Nemr K, 2016, CLINICS, V71, P114, DOI 10.6061/clinics/2016(03)01
- Pinho S.M.R., 2006, FUNDAMENTOS LARINGOL
- Pontes P, 2002, J VOICE, V16, P408, DOI 10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00112-1
- Provenzano Lucia Cristina Fernandes Antunes, 2010, Rev. CEFAC, V12, P97, DOI 10.1590/S1516-18462010000100013
- Rantala LM, 2015, J SPEECH LANG HEAR R, V58, P1397, DOI 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0248
- Dreossi Raquel Cecília Fischer, 2005, Pró-Fono R. Atual. Cient., V17, P251, DOI 10.1590/S0104-56872005000200014
- Ribeiro Vanessa Veis, 2014, Audiol., Commun. Res., V19, P387, DOI 10.1590/S2317-64312014000400001395
- Servilha EAM, 2014, DISTURB COMUN, V26, P452
- Simoes M, 2006, REV SAUDE PUBL, V40, P1013, DOI 10.1590/s0034-89102006000700008
- Simoes-Zenari M, 2012, REV SAUDE PUBL, V46, P657, DOI [10.1590/S0034-89102012005000038, 10.1590/s0034-89102012005000038]