Abdominal wall reconstruction after desmoid type fibromatosis radical resection: Case series from a single institution and review of the literature

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
13
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Citação
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, v.33, p.167-172, 2017
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall desmoid type fibromatosis management has been changing over recent years, from an aggressive approach towards a more conservative one. When radical resection is indicated, the surgical team faces the challenge of abdominal wall reconstruction, for which optimal technique is still debated. The present study reports the experience from a single center with abdominal closures after desmoid type fibromatosis resection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent abdominal wall closure after sporadic abdominal desmoid type fibromatosis radical resection from 1982 to 2013. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included, mean tumor diameter was 10 + 5.3 cm, and the main choice of abdominal wall reconstruction was midline closure with anterior rectus sheath relaxing incisions and polypropylene onlay mesh (74% of the cases). Only 7% of the cases required more complex procedures for skin closure. Mean follow-up was 5 years and 89% remained disease-free. No grade 4 or 5 complications were observed. CONCLUSION: High midline fascial closure rate can be achieved after resection of abdominal wall desmoid tumor using relaxing incisions and mesh, with low complication rate. (C) 2017 The Author(s).
Palavras-chave
Case series, Abdominal wall reconstruction, Desmoid type fibromatosis, Desmoid resection, Surgical technique
Referências
  1. Agha RA, 2016, INT J SURG, V36, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.025
  2. Awwad J., 2013, CASE REP OBSTET GYNE, V2012, P1
  3. Berri RN, 2011, ANN PLAS SURG, V67, P551, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182084cf6
  4. Bertani E, 2012, WORLD J SURG ONCOL, V10, DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-10-184
  5. Bertani E, 2009, ANN SURG ONCOL, V16, P1642, DOI 10.1245/s10434-009-0439-z
  6. Bonvalot S, 2008, EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC, V34, P462, DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.06.006
  7. Brenner P, 2002, LANGENBECK ARCH SURG, V386, P592, DOI 10.1007/s00423-002-0277-y
  8. Catania Gaetano, 2012, Updates Surg, V64, P43, DOI 10.1007/s13304-011-0109-0
  9. Durkin AJ, 2005, J SURG ONCOL, V89, P86, DOI 10.1002/jso.20189
  10. Garvey P.B., 2013, AUSTRALIAN, P19
  11. Kadoch V, 2010, J VISC SURG, V147, pE45, DOI 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2010.05.005
  12. Lazar AJF, 2008, AM J PATHOL, V173, P1518, DOI 10.2353/ajpath.2008.080475
  13. Lev D, 2007, J CLIN ONCOL, V25, P1785, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.5015
  14. Mac Farlene J., CLIN REPORTS SURG PR
  15. Mankin HJ, 2010, J SURG ONCOL, V102, P380, DOI 10.1002/jso.21433
  16. Mullen JT, 2012, ANN SURG ONCOL, V19, P4028, DOI 10.1245/s10434-012-2638-2
  17. Muller J., 1838, UEBER FEIERN BAU MEN
  18. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, NAT COMPR CANC NETW
  19. Peng PD, 2012, ANN SURG ONCOL, V19, P4036, DOI 10.1245/s10434-012-2634-6
  20. Phillips SR, 2004, BRIT J SURG, V91, P1624, DOI 10.1002/bjs.4792
  21. Priolli D.G., 2005, REV BRAS GINECOL OBS, V27
  22. Rifaat Mohamad A, 2005, J Egypt Natl Canc Inst, V17, P139
  23. Salas S, 2011, J CLIN ONCOL, V29, P3553, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.5489
  24. Singer S., 2011, CANC PRINCIPLES PRAC
  25. Stojadinovic A, 2001, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V136, P70, DOI 10.1001/archsurg.136.1.70
  26. Sutton RJ, 1999, EUR J SURG ONCOL, V25, P398, DOI 10.1053/ejso.1999.0664
  27. Tejpar S, 1999, ONCOGENE, V18, P6615, DOI 10.1038/sj.onc.1203041
  28. Wilkinson MJ, 2014, ANN SURG ONCOL, V21, P2144, DOI 10.1245/s10434-014-3618-5
  29. Yezhelyev MV, 2012, ANN PLAS SURG, V69, P186, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31821d0715