Optimized Protocol for Fast CT Angiography of Lower Limbs Using 160-Row Detector

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Autores
TACHIBANA, Adriano
DIAS, Bianca Oberhuber
FAILLA, Bruna Bonaventura
SILVA, Camila dos Santos
MENDES, Cynthia de Almeida
FIORANELLI, Alexandre
WOLOSKER, Nelson
Citação
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, v.40, n.6, p.953-957, 2016
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: We proposed and tested a novel acquisition protocol for optimizing a fast computed tomography angiography using a 160-row detector scanner using a longer contrast injection time coupled with multiphasic rate of injection. Methods: A prospective randomized study was performed to compare image quality, contrast enhancement, and radiation dose in 2 groups ( a fast acquisition and a widely accepted slow acquisition). Results: There was no difference between groups regarding image quality, noise, and diagnostic performance, but we evidenced a trend to higher radiation dose for the fast acquisition protocol. Conclusions: An optimized protocol for performing a fast acquisition computed tomography angiography of lower limbs is feasible, has sufficient diagnostic quality, and can be used in selected patients who would benefit from a short-time scan.
Palavras-chave
computed tomography, angiography, peripheral vascular disease, multislice
Referências
  1. Bae KT, 2000, RADIOLOGY, V216, P872
  2. Bae KT, 2004, RADIOLOGY, V231, P732, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2313030497
  3. Barrett JF, 2004, RADIOGRAPHICS, V24, P1679, DOI 10.1148/rg.246045065
  4. Bui Trung D, 2005, Vasc Endovascular Surg, V39, P481, DOI 10.1177/153857440503900604
  5. COCKCROFT DW, 1976, NEPHRON, V16, P31, DOI 10.1159/000180580
  6. Edwards AJ, 2005, CLIN RADIOL, V60, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.crad.2004.07.011
  7. Fleischmann D, 2005, RADIOLOGY, V236, P1076, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2363041392
  8. Fleischmann D, 2016, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V54, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.rcl.2015.09.002
  9. Fleischmann D, 2010, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V48, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.02.002
  10. Heijenbrok-Kal MH, 2007, RADIOLOGY, V245, P433, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2451061280
  11. Iezzi R, 2012, RADIOLOGY, V263, P287, DOI 10.1148/radiol.11110700
  12. McNitt-Gray MF, 2002, RADIOGRAPHICS, V22, P1541, DOI 10.1148/rg.226025128
  13. Meyer BC, 2008, EUR RADIOL, V18, P1546, DOI 10.1007/s00330-008-0914-0
  14. Patel MC, 2015, J AM COLL RADIOL, V12, P909, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.04.020
  15. Werncke T, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0119900
  16. Willmann JK, 2005, RADIOLOGY, V236, P1083, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2362040895