Artificial cornea transplantation and visual rehabilitation: an integrative review

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_FERNANDES_Artificial_cornea_transplantation_and_visual_rehabilitation_an_integrative_2024.PDF (275.86 KB)
Citações na Scopus
2
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2024
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
CONSEL BRASIL OFTALMOLOGIA
Autores
FERNANDES, Tayna Meneses
ALVES, Mariana Cassiano
DINIZ, Caroline Oliveira
QUEIROZ, Guilherme Cunha
Citação
ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, v.87, n.2, article ID e20210350, 7p, 2024
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Due to the development of complications and the biocompatibility and scarcity of transplant donor tissues, artificial corneas, which can be used for the rehabilitation of optical functions, have been developed. The current study aimed to analyze the visual rehabilitation effects of the Boston type I keratoprosthesis, Boston type II keratoprosthesis, Aurolab keratoprosthesis, osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis, and tibial bone keratoprosthesis. Results showed that the Boston type I keratoprosthesis was the most effective for visual rehabilitation in patients with moist ocular surfaces. The Aurolab keratoprosthesis had a lower efficacy for visual rehabilitation. Nevertheless, it is still a viable option for individuals in economically restricted countries. In patients with dry eyes, the Boston type II keratoprosthesis was associated with the best visual rehabilitation. However, the final visual acuity of patients who received osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis and tibial bone keratoprosthesis implantation was not evaluated as the necessary information was not available.
Palavras-chave
Corneal transplantation, Visual prosthesis, Cornea, Rehabilitation, Visual acuity
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/58080
Referências
  1. Acharya M, 2018, INDIAN J OPHTHALMOL, V66, P389, DOI 10.4103/ijo.IJO_861_17
  2. ahrq, Home | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  3. Akpek EK, 2014, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD009561.pub2
  4. Ang M, 2018, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V102, P878, DOI 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310745
  5. Aravena C, 2018, CORNEA, V37, P3, DOI 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001405
  6. Bakshi SK, 2020, CORNEA, V39, P484, DOI 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002207
  7. Balasopoulou A., 2017, BMC OPHTHALMOL, V17, DOI 10.4103/IJO.IJO
  8. Basu S, 2019, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V205, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.03.016
  9. Bourne RRA, 2017, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V5, pE888, DOI 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30293-0
  10. Brasil. Ministerio da Saude, Banco de Olhos
  11. Charoenrook V, 2018, OCUL SURF, V16, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.jtos.2018.02.003
  12. Charoenrook V, 2016, OCUL SURF, V14, P495, DOI 10.1016/j.jtos.2016.07.002
  13. Driver TH, 2018, CORNEA, V37, P1400, DOI 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001735
  14. Duignan ES, 2016, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V100, P1093, DOI 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307443
  15. Eckert KA, 2015, OPHTHAL EPIDEMIOL, V22, P349, DOI 10.3109/09286586.2015.1066394
  16. El-Khoury J, 2022, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V106, P929, DOI 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317483
  17. Falcinelli GC, 1999, An Inst Barraquer (Barc)., V28, P47
  18. Fung SSM, 2018, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V125, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.07.009
  19. Gain P, 2016, JAMA OPHTHALMOL, V134, P167, DOI 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4776
  20. Goins KM, 2016, CORNEA, V35, P1165, DOI 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000886
  21. Grobet P, 2020, Rev Med Liege, V75, P164
  22. Holladay JT, 1997, J REFRACT SURG, V13, P388
  23. Homayounfar G, 2017, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V101, P514, DOI 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307868
  24. Iyer G, 2019, OCUL SURF, V17, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.jtos.2018.08.003
  25. Kanu LN, 2020, OCUL SURF, V18, P613, DOI 10.1016/j.jtos.2020.07.012
  26. Lee R, 2017, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V124, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.011
  27. Muzychuk AK, 2017, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V124, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.019
  28. Ramrattan RS, 2001, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V119, P1788, DOI 10.1001/archopht.119.12.1788
  29. RICCI R, 1992, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V76, P232, DOI 10.1136/bjo.76.4.232
  30. Rico-Sánchez L, 2019, J TISSUE ENG REGEN M, V13, P2142, DOI 10.1002/term.2951
  31. Rudnisky CJ, 2016, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V162, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.10.023
  32. Saeed HN, 2017, CURR OPIN OPHTHALMOL, V28, P390, DOI 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000373
  33. Sharma N, 2016, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V100, P323, DOI 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306982
  34. STRAMPELLI B, 1963, Ann Ottalmol Clin Ocul, V89, P1039
  35. Tan DTH, 2012, LANCET, V379, P1749, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60437-1
  36. Temprano J, 1998, An Inst Barraquer (Barc), V27, P53
  37. Ursi ES, 2005, Prevencao de lesoes de pele no perioperatorio: revisao integrativa da literatura
  38. Vasquez-Perez A, 2018, CORNEA, V37, P993, DOI 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001618
  39. Venugopal A, 2016, CORNEA, V35, P1285, DOI 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000936
  40. Zhang B, 2019, MED ENG PHYS, V71, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.05.002

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/Outros
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/55