Orbitofacial morphology changes with different suture synostoses in Crouzon syndrome
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
4
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2022
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
Autores
LU, Xiaona
FORTE, Antonio Jorge
JUNN, Alexandra
DINIS, Jacob
ALPEROVICH, Michael
PERSING, John A.
Citação
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, v.50, n.5, p.406-418, 2022
Resumo
This study aims to investigate the influence of different cranial vault suture synostoses on orbital and periorbital morphological development in Crouzon syndrome. Computed tomography (CT) scans of Crouzon syndrome patients who had not undergone operation were subgrouped as follows: type I: bicoronal synostosis; type II: sagittal synostosis; type III: pansynostosis; type IV: perpendicular combinations of suture synostoses; and type V: bilateral squamosal synostosis. CT scans were measured using Materialise software. CT scans of 80 Crouzon syndrome patients and 72 normal controls were included. Orbital bony cavity volume was reduced in all subgroups (16-24%), including type V bilateral squamosal synostosis (16%, p = 0.003), although the reduction in type II sagittal synostosis Crouzon patients failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.071). Globe volume was reduced only in type I bicoronal synostosis (9%, p = 0.018), while the retrobulbar soft tissue volume decreased in type III pansynostosis group by 11% (p = 0.005). Globe volume projection beyond the orbital rim was increased in all groups (p < 0.001), with the greatest increase in type IV perpendicular combination of sutures synostoses, by 100% (p < 0.001). The anteroposterior length of maxilla was significantly shortened in type I (10%, p = 0.028) and type III (9%, p = 0.022) but developed normally in other groups, although the maxilla was posteriorly displaced in all groups (all p <= 0.026). The influence of squamosal synostosis on craniofacial malformation is not equivalent to that of a major vault suture. Therefore, subtype suture fusion individualized surgical interventions, after initial occipital expansion, likely provide additional benefits in mitigating oculo-orbital disproportion.
Palavras-chave
Crouzon syndrome, Orbit, Globe, Squamosal suture, Pansynostosis
Referências
- Azoury SC, 2017, INT J BIOL SCI, V13, P1479, DOI 10.7150/ijbs.22373
- Bartels MC, 2004, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V15, P1019, DOI 10.1097/00001665-200411000-00026
- Bender CA, 2013, J CRANIO MAXILL SURG, V41, pE146, DOI 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.12.002
- BURDI AR, 1986, CLEFT PALATE J, V23, P28
- Calandrelli R, 2014, NEURORADIOLOGY, V56, P865, DOI 10.1007/s00234-014-1392-5
- Carinci F, 2005, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V16, P361, DOI 10.1097/01.SCS.0000157078.53871.11
- CARR M, 1992, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V29, P129, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1992)029<0129:COZMFS>2.3.CO;2
- Fearon JA, 2017, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V140, p446E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003603
- Festa F, 2012, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V23, P789, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824dbeec
- Forte AJ, 2015, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V136, P1054, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001693
- Heutinck P, 2021, J CRANIO MAXILL SURG, V49, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.02.020
- Hoefkens MF, 2004, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V15, P233, DOI 10.1097/00001665-200403000-00013
- Klausing A, 2019, J CRANIO MAXILL SURG, V47, P1441, DOI 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.001
- Kreiborg S, 2010, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V21, P1354, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181ef2b53
- LOSKEN HW, 1989, S AFR MED J, V75, P320
- LOSKEN HW, 1989, S AFR MED J, V75, P274
- Lu XN, 2021, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V32, P581, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007203
- Lu XN, 2020, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V31, P678, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006173
- Lu XN, 2020, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V31, P673, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006181
- Lu XN, 2019, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V30, P2345, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005785
- Lu XN, 2019, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V143, p1233E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005643
- Lu XN, 2019, PRS-GLOB OPEN, V7, DOI 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002158
- Lu XN, 2019, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V30, P1671, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005396
- Masters M, 2015, J ANAT, V227, P460, DOI 10.1111/joa.12364
- Masters MP, 2012, MED HYPOTHESES, V78, P649, DOI 10.1016/j.mehy.2012.02.002
- Narayan D, 1998, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V9, P481, DOI 10.1097/00001665-199809000-00020
- Nie XG, 2005, ACTA ODONTOL SCAND, V63, P127, DOI 10.1080/00016350510019847
- O'Connor EJF, 2009, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V123, P1570, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a07625
- ORTIZMONASTERIO F, 1978, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V61, P507
- Pearce E, 2013, ANN HUM BIOL, V40, P531, DOI 10.3109/03014460.2013.815272
- Prevost R, 2019, J CRANIO MAXILL SURG, V47, P556, DOI 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.028
- Rogers GF, 2015, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V52, P751, DOI 10.1597/14-092
- ROSEN HM, 1984, J MAXILLOFAC SURG, V12, P56, DOI 10.1016/S0301-0503(84)80212-X
- Rosenberg P, 1997, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V99, P1396, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199704001-00030
- Runyan CM, 2017, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V140, p434E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003586
- Scafati CT, 2008, ANN PLAS SURG, V61, P285, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31815cbb3e
- Sharma VP, 2012, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V49, P373, DOI 10.1597/11-185
- Spruijt B, 2016, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V137, p112E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001894
- ter Maaten NS, 2018, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V29, P1169, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004473
- TESSIER P, 1971, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V48, P419, DOI 10.1097/00006534-197111000-00002
- Way BLM, 2019, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V143, p121E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005105
- White N, 2009, CHILD NERV SYST, V25, P231, DOI 10.1007/s00381-008-0758-6