A COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM FOR THE APPLICATION OF BASSO, BEATTIE AND BRESNAHAN SCALE IN WISTAR RATS

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_MOLINA_A_COMPUTERIZED_SYSTEM_FOR_THE_APPLICATION_OF_BASSO_2015.PDF (210.71 KB)
Citações na Scopus
8
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2015
DOI
SciELO
Scopus
Web of Science
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ATHA COMUNICACAO & EDITORA
Autores
MOLINA, Alessandra Eira Iague Sleiman
MOLINA, Marcos Sleiman
MOLINA, Taina Peral
Citação
ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, v.23, n.4, p.179-183, 2015
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objectives: To develop and test a computer program to assist researchers in assigning scores in the application of the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan (BBB) scale and to compare these scores when doing so in free, targeted and automated computer-assisted modes. Method: To test the program, the participants used the Impactor methodology recommended by the New York University (USA), in which 12 Wistar rats submitted to spinal cord injury were filmed on the 28th day after the injury. Eight researchers from the Laboratory of Medical Investigation, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil took part in the study. The two heads of the laboratory, with 15 years of experience in the application of the scale, were considered the gold standard. Results: The results of the scale application were not significantly different in relation to the gold standard, considering the mean of the evaluators in each method: free, targeted and automated form (with the help of the computer). Conclusions: The application of the BBB scale in the automated mode, using the computer program, did not present any difference in relation to the gold standard for all the evaluators.
Palavras-chave
Spine, Methods, Spinal cord compression, Evaluation, Diagnosis, computer-assisted, Rats
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/11739
Referências
  1. Barros Filho TEP, 1995, COLUNA VERTEBRAL DIA
  2. Basso DM, 1996, EXP NEUROL, V139, P244, DOI 10.1006/exnr.1996.0098
  3. BASSO DM, 1995, J NEUROTRAUM, V12, P1, DOI 10.1089/neu.1995.12.1
  4. CONSTANTINI S, 1994, J NEUROSURG, V80, P97, DOI 10.3171/jns.1994.80.1.0097
  5. Cristante AF, 2010, ACTA ORTOP BRAS, V18, P284, DOI 10.1590/S1413-78522010000500008
  6. FAIRHOLM DJ, 1971, J NEUROSURG, V35, P277, DOI 10.3171/jns.1971.35.3.0277
  7. Ferguson AR, 2004, J NEUROTRAUM, V21, P1601, DOI 10.1089/0897715042441747
  8. Jakeman LB, 2005, ANIMAL MODELS ACUTE, P433
  9. Koopmans GC, 2005, J NEUROTRAUM, V22, P214, DOI 10.1089/neu.2005.22.214
  10. Kuhn PL, 1998, J NEUROTRAUM, V15, P125, DOI 10.1089/neu.1998.15.125
  11. Metz GAS, 2000, BRAIN RES, V883, P165, DOI 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02778-5
  12. Molina AEIS, 2006, THESIS U SAO PAULO S
  13. PANJABI MM, 1988, SPINE, V13, P1365, DOI 10.1097/00007632-198812000-00007
  14. Rodrigues NR, 1999, THESIS U SAO PAULO S
  15. dos Santos GB, 2011, ACTA ORTOP BRAS, V19, P87, DOI 10.1590/S1413-78522011000200005
  16. Scheff SW, 2002, J NEUROTRAUM, V19, P1251, DOI 10.1089/08977150260338038
  17. TARLOV IM, 1954, AMA ARCH NEUROL PSY, V71, P588
  18. Vialle LRG, 1999, REV BRAS ORTOP, V34, P85
  19. Yeo J D, 1975, Paraplegia, V12, P279

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/41