ANTONIO DOS SANTOS BARBOZA
Índice h a partir de 2011
2
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
PAHC, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
3 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3
- Reinfection rate in a cohort of healthcare workers over 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic(2023) GUEDES, Ana Rubia; OLIVEIRA, Maura S. S.; TAVARES, Bruno M. M.; LUNA-MUSCHI, Alessandra; LAZARI, Carolina dos Santos; MONTAL, Amanda C. C.; FARIA, Elizabeth de; MAIA, Fernando Liebhart; BARBOZA, Antonio dos Santos; LEME, Mariana Deckers; TOMAZINI, Francis M. M.; COSTA, Silvia Figueiredo; LEVIN, Anna S. S.In this large cohort of healthcare workers, we aimed to estimate the rate of reinfections by SARS-CoV-2 over 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated the proportion of reinfections among all the cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 10, 2020 until March 10, 2022. Reinfection was defined as the appearance of new symptoms that on medical evaluation were suggestive of COVID-19 and confirmed by a positive RT-PCR. Symptoms had to occur more than 90 days after the previous infection. These 2 years were divided into time periods based on the different variants of concern (VOC) in the city of Sao Paulo. There were 37,729 medical consultations due to COVID-19 at the hospital's Health Workers Services; and 25,750 RT-PCR assays were performed, of which 23% (n = 5865) were positive. Reinfection by SARS-CoV-2 was identified in 5% (n = 284) of symptomatic cases. Most cases of reinfection occurred during the Omicron period (n = 251; 88%), representing a significant increase on the SARS-CoV-2 reinfection rate before and during the Omicron variant period (0.8% vs. 4.3%; p < 0.001). The mean interval between SARS-CoV-2 infections was 429 days (ranged from 122 to 674). The Omicron variant spread faster than Gamma and Delta variant. All SARS-CoV-2 reinfections were mild cases.
- Clinical features of COVID-19 by SARS-CoV-2 Gamma variant: A prospective cohort study of vaccinated and unvaccinated healthcare workers(2022) LUNA-MUSCHI, Alessandra; BORGES, Igor C.; FARIA, Elizabeth de; BARBOZA, Antonio S.; MAIA, Fernando L.; LEME, Mariana D.; GUEDES, Ana Rubia; MENDES-CORREA, Maria Cassia; KALLAS, Esper G.; SEGURADO, Aluisio C.; DUARTE, Alberto J. S.; LAZARI, Carolina S.; ANDRADE, Pamela S.; SALES, Flavia C. S.; CLARO, Ingra M.; SABINO, Ester C.; LEVIN, Anna S.; COSTA, Silvia F.
- Multicenter Diagnostic Evaluation of OnSite COVID-19 Rapid Test (CTK Biotech) among Symptomatic Individuals in Brazil and the United Kingdom(2023) THOMPSON, Caitlin; TORRES, Pablo Munoz; KONTOGIANNI, Konstantina; BYRNE, Rachel; NOGUERA, Saidy Vasconez; LUNA-MUSCHI, Alessandra; MARCHI, Ana Paula; ANDRADE, Pamela S.; BARBOZA, Antonio dos Santos; NISHIKAWARA, Marli; BODY, Richard; VOS, Margaretha de; ESCADAFAL, Camille; ADAMS, Emily; COSTA, Silvia Figueiredo; CUBAS-ATIENZAR, AnaEvaluating rapid diagnostic tests in diverse populations is essential to improving diagnostic responses as it gives an indication of the accuracy in real-world scenarios. In the case of rapid diagnostic testing within this pandemic, lateral flow tests that meet the minimum requirements for sensitivity and specificity can play a key role in increasing testing capacity, allowing timely clinical management of those infected, and protecting health care systems. The COVID-19 pandemic has given rise to numerous commercially available antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs). To generate and to share accurate and independent data with the global community requires multisite prospective diagnostic evaluations of Ag-RDTs. This report describes the clinical evaluation of the OnSite COVID-19 rapid test (CTK Biotech, CA, USA) in Brazil and the United Kingdom. A total of 496 paired nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs were collected from symptomatic health care workers at Hospital das Clinicas in Sao Paulo, Brazil, and 211 NP swabs were collected from symptomatic participants at a COVID-19 drive-through testing site in Liverpool, United Kingdom. Swabs were analyzed by Ag-RDT, and results were compared to quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR). The clinical sensitivity of the OnSite COVID-19 rapid test in Brazil was 90.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.1 to 96.7%) and in the United Kingdom was 75.3% (95% CI, 64.6 to 83.6%). The clinical specificity in Brazil was 99.4% (95% CI, 98.1 to 99.8%) and in the United Kingdom was 95.5% (95% CI, 90.6 to 97.9%). Concurrently, analytical evaluation of the Ag-RDT was assessed using direct culture supernatant of SARS-CoV-2 strains from wild-type (WT), Alpha, Delta, Gamma, and Omicron lineages. This study provides comparative performance of an Ag-RDT across two different settings, geographical areas, and populations. Overall, the OnSite Ag-RDT demonstrated a lower clinical sensitivity than claimed by the manufacturer. The sensitivity and specificity from the Brazil study fulfilled the performance criteria determined by the World Health Organization, but the performance obtained from the UK study failed to do. Further evaluation of Ag-RDTs should include harmonized protocols between laboratories to facilitate comparison between settings.IMPORTANCE Evaluating rapid diagnostic tests in diverse populations is essential to improving diagnostic responses as it gives an indication of the accuracy in real-world scenarios. In the case of rapid diagnostic testing within this pandemic, lateral flow tests that meet the minimum requirements for sensitivity and specificity can play a key role in increasing testing capacity, allowing timely clinical management of those infected, and protecting health care systems. This is particularly valuable in settings where access to the test gold standard is often restricted.