TIAGO BIACHI DE CASTRIA
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
6 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 6 de 6
- SURGICAL TREATMENT IN CLINICAL STAGE IV GASTRIC CANCER: A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT PROCEDURES AND SURVIVAL OUTCOMES(2022) RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; PEREIRA, Marina Alessandra; DIAS, Andre Roncon; CASTRIA, Tiago Biachi de; SAKAMOTO, Erica; RIBEIRO-JR, Ulysses; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; NAHAS, Sergio CarlosBACKGROUND: Even in clinical stage IV gastric cancer (GC), surgical procedures may be required to palliate symptoms or in an attempt to improve survival. However, the limited survival of these patients raises doubts about who really had benefits from it. AIM: This study aimed to analyze the surgical outcomes in stage IV GC treated with surgical procedures without curative intent. METHODS: Retrospective analyses of patients with stage IV GC submitted to surgical procedures including tumor resection, bypass, jejunostomy, and diagnostic laparoscopy were performed. Patients with GC undergoing curative gastrectomy served as the comparison group. RESULTS: Surgical procedures in clinical stage IV were performed in 363 patients. Compared to curative surgery (680 patients), stage IV patients had a higher rate of comorbidities and ASA III/IV classification. The surgical procedures that were performed included 107 (29.4%) bypass procedures (partitioning/gastrojejunal anastomosis), 85 (23.4%) jejunostomies, 76 (20.9%) resections, and 76 (20.9%) diagnostic laparoscopies. Regarding patients' characteristics, resected patients had more distant metastasis (p=0.011), bypass patients were associated with disease in more than one site (p<0.001), and laparoscopy patients had more peritoneal metastasis (p<0.001). According to the type of surgery, the median overall survival was as follows: resection (13.6 months), bypass (7.8 months), jejunostomy (2.7 months), and diagnostic (7.8 months, p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, low albumin levels, in case of more than one site of disease, jejunostomy, and laparoscopy, were associated with worse survival. CONCLUSION: Stage IV resected cases have better survival, while patients submitted to jejunostomy and diagnostic laparoscopy had the worst results. The proper identification of patients who would benefit from surgical resection may improve survival and avoid futile procedures.
- Schistosomiasis Misleading Gastric Cancer Treatment(2020) RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; DUARTE, Vinicius Campos; PEREIRA, Marina Alessandra; CASTRIA, Tiago Biachi de; SCHMERLING, Claudia Kliemann; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; RIBEIRO-JUNIOR, Ulysses; CECCONELLO, Ivan
- Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical and pathological results of gastric cancer patients: A case-control study(2020) CHARRUF, Amir Zeide; RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; PEREIRA, Marina Alessandra; DIAS, Andre Roncon; CASTRIA, Tiago Biachi de; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; CECCONELO, Ivan; RIBEIRO, UlyssesBackground and Objective Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery represents a treatment option for patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). This case-control study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of GC patients who received NACT, and its impact on survival. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients with GC who underwent gastrectomy. A total of 45 cases with NACT were matched with consecutive 45 patients who underwent upfront gastrectomy for the following characteristics: gender, age, gastrectomy type, lymphadenectomy extent, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, histological type, cT and cN. Results NACT group had smaller tumors (4.9 vs 6.8 cm P = .006), lower lymphatic invasion rate (40% vs 73.3%, P = .001), lower venous invasion rate (18% vs 46.7%, P = .003) and lower perineural invasion rate (35% vs 77.8%, P < .0001). The ypTNM stage was lower in patients treated with NACT (P < .001). The major postoperative complication (POC) rate was lower in NACT patients (6.7% vs 24.4%, P = .02), as was hospital length of stay (10.8 vs 17 days, P = .005). Conclusions NACT allowed nodal and tumor downstaging. In addition, patients who underwent NACT had fewer POC and shorter length of hospital stay.
- Return to Intended Oncologic Treatment (RIOT) in Resected Gastric Cancer Patients(2020) RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; CASTRIA, Tiago Biachi de; PEREIRA, Marina Alessandra; DIAS, Andre Roncon; ANTONACIO, Fernanda Fronzoni; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; HOFF, Paulo Marcelo Gehm; RIBEIRO JR., Ulysses; CECCONELLO, IvanBackground Postoperative chemotherapy (CMT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is commonly recommended for gastric cancer (GC) patients in order to improve survival. However, some factors that prevent patients from return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT) may increase the risk of recurrence and decrease the survival benefits achieved with curative resection. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and factors associated with inability to RIOT and their impact on survival. Methods This retrospective study included stage II/III GC patients treated with potentially curative gastrectomy. Patients who could return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT group) and those who could not (inability to RIOT group) were analyzed. Results Of the 313 eligible GC patients, 89 (28.4%) and 85 (27.2%) patients receive CRT and CMT, respectively, representing a RIOT rate of 55.6%. The main reason was attributed to general poor performance status (30.2%), followed by surgical postoperative complications (POC) (20.1%). Older age, higher ASA, D1 lymphadenectomy, and major POC were related to inability to RIOT. Older age, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and major POC were independent risk factors for inability to RIOT. Five-year DFS and OS were worse for the inability to RIOT group than for the RIOT group (p = 0.008 and p = 0.004, respectively). In multivariate analyses, absence of neoadjuvant therapy, total gastrectomy, pT3/T4, pN+, and inability to RIOT were associated with worse DFS. Type of gastrectomy, lymphadenectomy, pN status, Rx resection, and RIOT group were associated with OS. Conclusion Older age, high NLR, and major POC were risk factors for inability to RIOT. RIOT was an independent predictor of survival.
- Lymph node regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A predictor of survival in gastric cancer(2020) PEREIRA, Marina Alessandra; RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; DIAS, Andre Roncon; CARDILI, Leonardo; RIBEIRO, Renan Ribeiro e; CHARRUF, Amir Zeide; CASTRIA, Tiago Biachi de; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; CECONELLO, Ivan; ALVES, Venancio Avancini Ferreira; RIBEIRO JR., Ulysses; MELLO, Evandro Sobroza deBackground and Objective Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCMT) has been increasingly used in advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, the prognostic impact of tumor response remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate if tumor response at the primary site and lymph nodes (LN) correlate with survival in GC patients after nCMT. Methods Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma treated with nCMT followed by gastrectomy were evaluated. Residual tumor was graded from 0% to 100%, defining two groups: poor (PR) and major response (MR). LN regression rate (LNRR) was determined based on tumor/fibrosis examination at each LN and a cutoff value established by receiver operating characteristic curve. Results Among 62 cases, 20 (32.2%) had MR and 42 (67.7%) PR. Smaller size, diffuse histology, lower ypT status and less advanced stage were associated with the MR group. Based on cutoff value of 57, 45.6% and 54.4% patients were classified as low-LNRR and high-LNRR. High-LNRR correlated with absence of venous, lymphatic and perineural invasion, and less advanced stage. Survival was equivalent between MR and PR (P = .956). High-LNRR had better disease-free survival (DFS) than low-LNRR (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, only LNRR associated with DFS. Conclusion High-LNRR associates with DFS in GC treated with nCMT. Response at the primary site does not correlate with survival.
- CONVERSION THERAPY FOR GASTRIC CANCER: EXPANDING THE TREATMENT POSSIBILITIES(2019) RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; PEREIRA, Marina Alessandra; CHARRUF, Amir Zeide; DIAS, Andre Roncon; CASTRIA, Tiago Biachi de; BARCHI, Leandro Cardoso; RIBEIRO-JUNIOR, Ulysses; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; CECCONELLO, IvanBackground: Conversion therapy in gastric cancer (GC) is defined as the use of chemotherapy/radiotherapy followed by surgical resection with curative intent of a tumor that was prior considered unresectable or oncologically incurable. Aim: To evaluate the results of conversion therapy in the treatment of GC. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all GC surgeries between 2009 and 2018. Patients who received any therapy before surgery were further identified to define the conversion group. Results: Out of 1003 surgeries performed for GC, 113 cases underwent neoadjuvant treatment and 16 (1.6%) were considered as conversion therapy. The main indication for treatment was: T4b lesions (n = 10), lymph node metastasis (n = 4), peritoneal carcinomatosis and hepatic metastasis in one case each. The diagnosis was made by imaging in 14 cases (75%) and during surgical procedure in four (25%). The most commonly used chemotherapy regimens were XP and mFLOX. Major surgical complications occurred in four cases (25%) and one (6.3%) died. After an average follow-up of 20 months, 11 patients (68.7%) had recurrence and nine (56.3%) died. Prolonged recurrence-free survival over 40 months occurred in two cases. Conclusion: Conversion therapy may offer the possibility of prolonged survival for a group of GC patients initially considered beyond therapeutic possibility.