MARINA DE PAULA ANDRES
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/58 - Laboratório de Ginecologia Estrutural e Molecular, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
4 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
- Postoperative Bowel Symptoms Improve over Time after Rectosigmoidectomy for Endometriosis(2020) BASSI, Marco Antonio; ANDRES, Marina Paula; BASSI, Carolina Morales; SIUFI NETO, Joao; KHO, Rosanne M.; ABRAO, Mauricio SimoesStudy Objective: To evaluate bowel function (changes in stool caliber, sensation of incomplete evacuation, stooling frequency, and rectal bleeding) and urinary function (dysuria and retention) after segmental resection in patients with bowel endometriosis. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Tertiary hospital. Patients: A total of 413 (mean age = 33.6 +/- 5.1 years) of reproductive aged women, with bowel endometriosis that underwent segmental bowel resection of the rectosigmoid from 2005 to 2018, without history of prior bowel surgery, without existing or history of malignancy. Interventions: Laparoscopic segmental bowel resection performed by the same team and with the same technique. Measurements and Main Results: Data collected from the patients' records included length of resected segment, distance of the lesion from the anal verge, and complications. Information on intestinal and urinary function was obtained from a questionnaire applied before the surgery and at 2, 6, and 12 months after the surgery. There was a significant increase in the incidence of stool thinning and rectal bleeding 2 months after surgical procedure; these symptoms decreased significantly over time. The incidence of urinary symptoms decreased significantly over time after surgery. The length of the bowel segment resected was not associated with the postoperative symptoms, but the rectosigmoid lesion was significantly closer to the anal verge in patients with rectal bleeding and urinary symptoms. There was no association between the length of intestinal segment resected and the frequency of stooling. At 6 months, patients who had a decreased frequency of stooling underwent a resection closer to the anal verge (9.7 cm) in comparison with the ones with unchanged or increase frequency of stooling (10.1 cm and 10.7 cm, respectively; p <.05). Conclusion: Patient complaints on bowel and urinary alterations after segmental resection were transient with significant improvement over time up to 12 months. Bowel and urinary symptoms were not associated with the size of the bowel segment resected, whereas rectal bleeding at 2 months after surgery was significantly associated with the distance from anal verge. Segmental resection was also associated with a great improvement in constipation at 12 months postoperative.
- Optimizing Perioperative Outcomes with Selective Bowel Resection Following an Algorithm Based on Preoperative Imaging for Bowel Endometriosis(2020) ABRAO, Mauricio S.; ANDRES, Marina P.; BARBOSA, Rodrigo N.; BASSI, Marco A.; KHO, Rosanne M.Study Objective: To validate the algorithm for selective bowel surgery based on preoperative imaging by comparing the perioperative outcomes of patients who undergo each type of bowel surgery for deep bowel disease, and secondarily to evaluate the incidence, factors, and subsequent outcomes when the actual procedure performed deviated from the preoperative surgical plan. Design: Retrospective study comparing 3 surgical interventions in an intention-to-treat analysis. Setting: Tertiary care hospital. Patients: Women with significant pain (visual analog scale [VAS] >7) who were diagnosed with bowel endometriosis from preoperative imaging and underwent laparoscopic surgery for bowel endometriosis at a large referral center between 2014 and 2017. Intervention: Laparoscopic shaving, disc resection, or full-segment resection and reanastomosis of bowel endometriosis. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 172 patients (mean age, 36.6 +/- 5.2 years) underwent bowel surgery for endometriosis (n = 30 shaving, 71 disc, and 71 segmental resection). Total operative time was similar in the 3 group, but the mean length of hospital stay was longer in the segmental group (5.3 +/- 1.0 days) compared with the disc group (4.6 +/- 0.9 days) and the shaving group (3.8 +/- 1.5 days) (p = .001). The surgical procedure was performed as planned according to the clinical algorithm in 86.5% of patients. Adherence to the proposed clinical algorithm resulted in a low incidence of overall complications (8.7% of total complications, 4.6% of minor complications, and 3.5% of major complications). The incidence of minor complications was higher in the segmental group (9.9%) compared with the discoid group (1.4%) and the shaving group (0%) (p = .0236), whereas the incidence of major complications were similar across the 3 groups (3.3%, 2.8%, and 4.2%, respectively; p = .899). There was a significantly higher frequency of pseudomembranous colitis in the segmental resection group (7 patients; 9.9%) compared with the discoid group (n = 1; 1.4%) and shaving group (0%) (p = .04). Owing to discrepancies between preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings after dissection and mobilization, deviation from the planned procedure occurred in a total of 25 of 172 cases (14.5%), with a less extensive procedure actually performed in 21 of 25 (84%) of the deviated cases. One of the 4 cases (25%) that involved a more extensive procedure resulted in a major complication of rectovaginal fistula. Conclusion: Selective bowel resection algorithm provides a systematic approach to the surgical management of patients with bowel endometriosis. Adherence to the surgical plan according to the preoperative imaging and criteria outlined in the algorithm can be accomplished in the majority of patients; however, the surgical team should be aware that upstaging or downstaging may be required, depending on the intraoperative findings. When feasible, the team should opt for a less extensive procedure to avoid complications associated with more radical surgery.
- Is High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Effective for the Treatment of Adenomyosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis(2020) MARQUES, Ana Luiza Santos; ANDRES, Marina Paula; KHO, Rosanne M.; ABRAO, Mauricio SimoesStudy Objective: To systematically review the literature regarding the efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in reducing adenomyotic lesions, patients' pain and bleeding symptoms, and the impact on patients' quality of life. Data Source: A search was performed through PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. Methods of Study Selection: All available studies published in the English language in the last 10 years that evaluated the effects of HIFU for adenomyosis. Tabulation, Integration, and Results: A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A meta-analysis was performed on data from homogeneous studies. Pooled results from the meta-analysis showed that after HIFU treatment for adenomyosis, a large effect was observed in reducing the uterine volume at 12 months (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.85), a significant reduction in dysmenorrhea at 3 months (SMD = 1.83) and 12 months (SMD = 2.37), and a significant improvement in quality of life at 6 months (SMD = 3.0) and 12 months (SMD = 2.75). Adverse reactions after HIFU were reported in 55.9% of patients. Conclusion: This review suggests a potential benefit for HIFU in the treatment of adenomyosis-related symptoms; however, findings of the meta-analysis were based on fewer, nonuniform studies, which did not equally account for each specific symptom/parameter across the board. Results showed there appears to be a potential of HIFU in the treatment of adenomyosis-related symptoms. To date, there are no comparative and randomized clinical trials comparing the HIFU technique with other conservative treatment options. As yet, there are insufficient data regarding fertility and pregnancy outcomes.
- Extrapelvic Endometriosis: A Systematic Review(2020) ANDRES, Marina P.; ARCOVERDE, Fernanda V. L.; SOUZA, Carolina C. C.; FERNANDES, Luiz Flavio C.; ABRAO, Mauricio Simoes; KHO, Rosanne MarieObjective: To conduct a systematic review of the literature on patients with extrapelvic deep endometriosis. Data Sources: A thorough search of the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed. Methods of Study Selection: Studies in the last 20 years that reported on primary extrapelvic endometriosis were included (PROSPERO registration number CRD42019125370). Tabulation, Integration, and Results: The initial search identified 5465 articles, and 179 articles, mostly case reports and series, were included. A total of 230 parietal (PE), 43 visceral (VE), 628 thoracic (TE), 6 central nerve system, 12 extrapelvic muscle or nerve, and 1 nasal endometriosis articles were identified. Abdominal endometriosis was divided into PE and VE. PE lesions involved primary lesions of the abdominal wall, groin, and perineum. When present, symptoms included a palpable mass (99%), cyclic pain (71%) and cyclic bleeding (48%). Preoperative clinical suspicion was low, the use of tissue diagnosis was indeterminate (25%), and a few (8%) malignancies were suspected. Surgical treatment for PE included wide local excision (97%), with 5% recurrence and no complications. Patients with VE involving abdominal organs - kidneys, liver, pancreas, and biliary tract - were treated surgically (86%) with both conservative (51%) and radical resection (49%), with 15% recurrence and 2 major complications reported. In patients with TE involving the diaphragm, pleura, and lung, isolated and concomitant lesions occurred and favored the right side (80%). Patients with TE presented with the triad of catamenial pain, pneumothorax, and hemoptysis. Thoracoscopy with resection followed by pleurodesis was the most common procedure performed, with 29% recurrence. Adjuvant medical therapy with gonadotropin-releasing hormone was administered in 15% of cases. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was performed in all cases of nonthoracic and nonabdominal endometriosis. Common symptoms were paresthesia and cyclic pain with radiation. Surgical resection was reported in 84%, with improvement of symptoms. Conclusion: Extrapelvic endometriosis, traditionally thought to be rare, has been reported in a considerable number of cases. Heightened awareness and clinical suspicion of the disease and a multidisciplinary approach are recommended to achieve a prompt diagnosis and optimize patient outcomes. Currently, there are no comparative studies to provide recommendations regarding optimal diagnostic methods, treatment options, and outcomes for endometriosis involving extrapelvic sites.