Postoperative Bowel Symptoms Improve over Time after Rectosigmoidectomy for Endometriosis

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
6
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2020
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Autores
BASSI, Marco Antonio
BASSI, Carolina Morales
SIUFI NETO, Joao
KHO, Rosanne M.
Citação
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, v.27, n.6, p.1316-1323, 2020
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Study Objective: To evaluate bowel function (changes in stool caliber, sensation of incomplete evacuation, stooling frequency, and rectal bleeding) and urinary function (dysuria and retention) after segmental resection in patients with bowel endometriosis. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Tertiary hospital. Patients: A total of 413 (mean age = 33.6 +/- 5.1 years) of reproductive aged women, with bowel endometriosis that underwent segmental bowel resection of the rectosigmoid from 2005 to 2018, without history of prior bowel surgery, without existing or history of malignancy. Interventions: Laparoscopic segmental bowel resection performed by the same team and with the same technique. Measurements and Main Results: Data collected from the patients' records included length of resected segment, distance of the lesion from the anal verge, and complications. Information on intestinal and urinary function was obtained from a questionnaire applied before the surgery and at 2, 6, and 12 months after the surgery. There was a significant increase in the incidence of stool thinning and rectal bleeding 2 months after surgical procedure; these symptoms decreased significantly over time. The incidence of urinary symptoms decreased significantly over time after surgery. The length of the bowel segment resected was not associated with the postoperative symptoms, but the rectosigmoid lesion was significantly closer to the anal verge in patients with rectal bleeding and urinary symptoms. There was no association between the length of intestinal segment resected and the frequency of stooling. At 6 months, patients who had a decreased frequency of stooling underwent a resection closer to the anal verge (9.7 cm) in comparison with the ones with unchanged or increase frequency of stooling (10.1 cm and 10.7 cm, respectively; p <.05). Conclusion: Patient complaints on bowel and urinary alterations after segmental resection were transient with significant improvement over time up to 12 months. Bowel and urinary symptoms were not associated with the size of the bowel segment resected, whereas rectal bleeding at 2 months after surgery was significantly associated with the distance from anal verge. Segmental resection was also associated with a great improvement in constipation at 12 months postoperative.
Palavras-chave
Deep endometriosis, Bowel endometriosis, Laparoscopic surgery, Bowel symptoms, Urinary symptoms
Referências
  1. Abrao MS, 2007, HUM REPROD, V22, P3092, DOI 10.1093/humrep/dem187
  2. Abrao MS, 2008, J MINIM INVAS GYN, V15, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.006
  3. Abrao MS, 2015, HUM REPROD UPDATE, V21, P329, DOI 10.1093/humupd/dmv003
  4. Arendas K, 2015, J ENDOMETR PELVIC PA, V7, P3, DOI 10.5301/je.5000207
  5. Armengol-Debeir L, 2011, HUM REPROD, V26, P2330, DOI 10.1093/humrep/der190
  6. Bellelis P, 2010, REV ASSOC MED BRAS, V56, P467, DOI 10.1590/S0104-42302010000400022
  7. Ceccaroni M, 2012, SURG ENDOSC, V26, P2029, DOI 10.1007/s00464-012-2153-3
  8. Chapron C, 1999, J AM ASSOC GYN LAP, V6, P31, DOI 10.1016/S1074-3804(99)80037-1
  9. Goncalves MOD, 2010, HUM REPROD, V25, P665, DOI 10.1093/humrep/dep433
  10. Darai E, 2005, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V192, P394, DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.033
  11. De Cicco C, 2011, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V118, P285, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02744.x
  12. Dindo D, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P205, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
  13. Dubernard G, 2008, HUM REPROD, V23, P846, DOI 10.1093/humrep/den026
  14. Dubernard G, 2006, HUM REPROD, V21, P1243, DOI 10.1093/humrep/dei491
  15. Erdem S, 2018, DIS COLON RECTUM, V61, P733, DOI 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001047
  16. Jerby BL, 1999, SURG ENDOSC-ULTRAS, V13, P1125, DOI 10.1007/s004649901187
  17. Kho RM, 2018, BEST PRACT RES CL OB, V51, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.01.020
  18. Mabrouk M, 2012, FERTIL STERIL, V97, P652, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.019
  19. Malzoni M, 2016, J MINIM INVAS GYN, V23, P512, DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.024
  20. Millochau JC, 2018, J MINIM INVAS GYN, V25, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.09.007
  21. Riiskjaer M, 2016, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V123, P1360, DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.13975
  22. Riiskjaer M, 2018, DIS COLON RECTUM, V61, P221, DOI 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000970
  23. Roman H, 2009, GYNECOL OBSTET FERTI, V37, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2009.03.002
  24. Roman H, 2019, J GYNECOL OBSTET HUM, V48, P625, DOI 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.03.013
  25. Roman H, 2018, HUM REPROD, V33, P47, DOI 10.1093/humrep/dex336
  26. Roman H, 2016, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V215, DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.055
  27. Roman H, 2013, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V209, P524, DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.015
  28. Roman H, 2013, FERTIL STERIL, V99, P1695, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.131
  29. Roman H, 2010, JSLS-J SOC LAPAROEND, V14, P169, DOI 10.4293/108680810X12785289143800
  30. Roman H, 2010, HUM REPROD, V25, P890, DOI 10.1093/humrep/dep407
  31. Ruffo G, 2014, BIOMED RES INT, V2014, DOI 10.1155/2014/463058
  32. Ruffo G, 2010, SURG ENDOSC, V24, P63, DOI 10.1007/s00464-009-0517-0
  33. Soto E, 2016, J MINIM INVAS GYN, V23, P753, DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.004