MARIANA PEREIRA GRANER
Índice h a partir de 2011
1
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/12 - Laboratório de Pesquisa Básica em Doenças Renais, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
5 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 5 de 5
- Gender-Based Discrimination Among Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in Brazil(2023) FARIA, Isabella; CAMPOS, Leticia; JEAN-PIERRE, Tayana; NAUS, Abbie; GERK, Ayla; CAZUMBA, Maria Luiza; BUDA, Alexandra M.; GRANER, Mariana; MOURA, Carolina B.; PENDLETON, Alaska; POMPERMAIER, Laura; TRUCHE, Paul; FERREIRA, Julia Loyola; BOULDER, Alexis N.Introduction: Gender-based discrimination (GBD) creates a hostile environment during medical school, affecting students' personal life and academic performance. Little is known about how GBD affects the over 204,000 medical students in Brazil. This study aims to explore the patterns of GBD experienced by medical students in Brazil. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study using an anonymous, Portuguese survey dissemi-nated in June 2021 among Brazilian medical students. The survey was composed of 24 questions to collect data on GBD during medical school, formal methods for reporting GBD, and possible solutions for GBD. Results: Of 953 responses, 748 (78%) were cisgender women, 194 (20%) were cisgender men, and 11 (1%) were from gender minorities. 65% (616/942) of respondents reported experiencing GBD during medical school. Women students experienced GBD more than men (77% versus 22%; P < 0.001). On comparing GBD perpetrator roles, both women (82%, 470/574) and men (64%, 27/42) reported the highest rate of GBD by faculty members. The occurrence of GBD by location differed between women and men. Only 12% (115/953) of respondents reported knowing their institution had a reporting mechanism for GBD. Conclusions: Most respondents experienced GBD during medical school. Cisgender women experienced GBD more than cisgender men. Perpetrators and location of GBD differed for men and women. Finally, an alarming majority of students did not know how to formally report GBD in their schools. It is imperative to adopt broad policy changes to diminish the rate of GBD and its a consequential burden on medical students. 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- Gender-Based Discrimination Among Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in Brazil (vol 15, pg 283, 2022)(2023) FARIA, Isabella; CAMPOS, Leticia; JEAN-PIERRE, Tayana; NAUS, Abbie; GERK, Ayla; CAZUMBA, Maria Luiza; BUDA, Alexandra M.; GRANER, Mariana; MOURA, Carolina B.; PENDLETON, Alaska; POMPERMAIER, Laura; TRUCHE, Paul; FERREIRA, Julia Loyola; BOWDER, Alexis N.
- Who tells the story of burns in low-and-middle income countries? - A bibliometric study(2023) WALL, S. L.; VELIN, L.; ABBAS, A.; ALLORTO, N. L.; GRANER, M.; MOELLER, E.; RYAN-COKER, M. F. D.; POMPERMAIER, L.Introduction: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain drastically underrepresented in health research, with African countries producing less than 1% of the global output. This work investigates authorship patterns of publications on burns in LMICs. Original research studies addressing burn injuries in LMICs and published between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2020 were included in the review. Descriptive statistics were performed for country affiliations of authors, World Bank Country Income Groups, WHO group, study-focus and country studied. Of the 458 results, 426 studies met the inclusion criteria. Nearly a quarter of papers on burns in LMICs had both first and senior authors from high-income countries (HICs, n = 95, 24.4%), more than half of the papers had both first and senior authors from upper middle- income countries (upper MICs, n = 222, 57.2%), while less than 1% (n = 3) had first and senior authors exclusively from lower income countries (LICs). Eleven percent (n = 41/388) of all papers were written without either first nor senior author being from the country studied, and 17 of them (41%) had both first and senior authors from the USA. Twenty-five (6%) of the papers had the first author and not the senior author from the country of focus, while six (2%) had the senior and not the first author from the country of interest. To overcome global health challenges such as burns, locally led research is imperative. The maximum benefit of HIC-LMIC collaborations is achieved when LMICs play an active role in leading the research. When LMICs direct the research being conducted in their country, the harm of inherently inequitable relationships is minimized.
- Online medical education: A student survey(2023) FARIA, Isabella; MOURA, Carolina B.; GRANER, Mariana; CAMPOS, Leticia Nunes; GERK, Ayla; BITTENCOURT, Marcela M.; CAZUMBA, Maria Luiza; MISHALY, Asher; BUDA, Alexandra M.; TRUCHE, Paul; BOWDER, Alexis N.; BOTELHO, Fabio; CARROLL, Madeleine; MOONEY, David; NAUS, AbbieBackgroundDuring COVID-19, medical schools transitioned to online learning as an emergency response to deliver their education programmes. This multi-country study compared the methods by which medical schools worldwide restructured the delivery of medical education during the pandemic. MethodsThis multi-country, cross-sectional study was performed using an internet-based survey distributed to medical students in multiple languages in November 2020. ResultsA total of 1,746 responses were received from 79 countries. Most respondents reported that their institution stopped in-person lectures, ranging from 74% in low-income countries (LICs) to 93% in upper-middle-income countries. While only 36% of respondents reported that their medical school used online learning before the pandemic, 93% reported using online learning after the pandemic started. Of students enrolled in clinical rotations, 89% reported that their rotations were paused during the pandemic. Online learning replaced in-person clinical rotations for 32% of respondents from LICs versus 55% from high-income countries (HICs). Forty-three per cent of students from LICs reported that their internet connection was insufficient for online learning, compared to 11% in HICs. ConclusionsThe transition to online learning due to COVID-19 impacted medical education worldwide. However, this impact varied among countries of different income levels, with students from LICs and lower middle income countries facing greater challenges in accessing online medical education opportunities while in-person learning was halted. Specific policies and resources are needed to ensure equitable access to online learning for medical students in all countries, regardless of socioeconomic status.
- Association for Academic Surgery Gender Discrimination, Career Aspirations, and Access to Mentorship Among Medical Students in Brazil(2022) GERK, Ayla; CAMPOS, Leticia; NAUS, Abbie; FARIA, Isabella; BUDA, Alexandra M.; MOURA, Carolina B.; GRANER, Mariana; CAZUMBA, Maria Luiza; PIERRE, Tayana Assomptia Jean; POMPERMAIER, Laura; TRUCHE, Paul; PENDLETON, Alaska; BOWDER, Alexis N.; FERREIRA, Julia LoyolaIntroduction: Gender-based discrimination (GBD) creates a hostile environment that can affect medical students. Mentorship has been recognized as a mitigating factor for GBD. We aimed to investigate the impacts of GBD on career selection and well-being of medical students in Brazil and to explore access to mentorship among these students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed using an anonymous survey in Portuguese. The survey was distributed in June 2021 to students enrolled in Brazilian medical schools. It contained 24 questions, including demographics, episodes of GBD experienced by responders and their impact on professional and personal life, and mentorship access. Results: Of 953 respondents, 748 (78%) were cisgender women, 194 (20%) cisgender men, and 11 nonbinary (1%). Sixty-six percent (625/953) of students reported experiencing GBD, with cisgender women and nonbinary being more likely to experience it than cisgender men (P < 0.001). Responders who experiences GBD report moderate to severe impact on career satisfaction (40%, 250/624), safety (68%, 427/624), self-confidence (68%, 426/624), well-being (57%, 357/625), and burnout (62%, 389/625). Cisgender women were more likely to report these effects than men counterparts (P < 0.01). Only 21% of respondents (201/953) had mentors in their medical schools.