DAGOBERTO CALLEGARO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
20
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/45 - Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Neurocirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/62 - Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Cirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
  • conferenceObject
    C-11-pib pet showed a distinct cerebrospinal fluid pattern in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis
    (2020) PITOMBEIRA, M.; DURAN, F.; CAMPANHOLO, K.; SOUZA, A.; APOSTOLOS-PEREIRA, S.; RIMKUS, C. Medeiros; MENDES, M. F.; BUSATTO FILHO, G.; CALLEGARO, D.; BUCHPIGUEL, C.; FARIA, D. De Paula
  • article 16 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Characterization of pain syndromes in patients with neuromyelitis optica
    (2020) VALERIO, Fernanda; APOSTOLOS-PEREIRA, Samira L.; SATO, Douglas Kazutoshi; CALLEGARO, Dagoberto; LUCATO, Leandro Tavares; BARBOZA, Victor Rosseto; SILVA, Valquiria A.; GALHARDONI, Ricardo; RODRIGUES, Antonia L. de Lima; TEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen; ANDRADE, Daniel Ciampi de
    Background Pain is common and refractory in spinal cord injury (SCI). Currently, most studies evaluated pain in male-predominant traumatic-SCI. Also, concomitant secondary pain syndromes and its temporal evolution were seldom reported. Methods We aimed to prospectively describe the main and secondary pain and its associated factors in inflammatory-SCI evaluating neuromyelitis optica (NMO) patients. In-remission NMO patients underwent neurological, imaging and autoantibody evaluations. Questionnaires detailing main and secondary pains, functional state, mood, catastrophizing, quality of life (QoL) and ""non-motor symptoms"" were used at two time points. Results Pain was present in 53 (73.6%) of the 72 patients included. At-level neuropathic pain was the most common main pain syndrome, affecting 32 subjects (60.4% of those with pain). Over 70% (n = 38) of this cohort reported two pain syndromes. Those without pain were significantly younger (26.1 +/- 12.7 y.o. in those without pain and 40.1 +/- 12.5, 37.2 +/- 11.4 y.o. in those whose main pain was neuropathic and non-neuropathic, respectively,p = .001), and no differences in the inflammatory status were observed between groups. On follow-up, one-fifth (n = 11) had a different main pain syndrome from the first visit. Pain impacted QoL as much as disability and motor strength. Conclusion Pain is a prevalent and disabling non-motor symptom in NMO-SCI. Most patients experience more than one pain syndrome which can change in time even in the absence of clinical relapse. Age of the inflammatory-SCI was a major determinant of pain. Acknowledging temporal changes and multiplicity of pain syndromes in NMO-SCI may give insights into more precise designs of clinical trials and general management of pain in SCI. Significance In this longitudinal study with NMO-related SCI, pain affected almost three-quarters of patients with NMO. Over 70% have more than one pain syndrome and at-level neuropathic pain is the most common type of pain syndrome. Patients without pain were significantly younger but had the same burden of inflammatory lesions than those with pain. During follow-up, up to one fifth of patients presented with changes in the main pain syndromes, which can occur even in the absence of clinical activity of the inflammatory disease. In this cohort, Pain affected quality of life as much as disability or motor strength.
  • conferenceObject
    Incidence and clinical outcome of COVID-19 in a cohort of 11.560 Brazilian patients with multiple sclerosis
    (2020) MENDES, M. F.; FERREIRA, M. L.; SOUSA, N. A.; THOMAZ, R.; APOSTOLOS-PEREIRA, S. L.; ALVES-LEON, S.; PICCOLO, A. C.; OLIVEIRA, E. M. De; VASCONCELOS, C. C.; MUNIZ, A.; GOMES NETO, A.; OLIVEIRA, B. E. De; ROCHA, F. Da; MARTINS, G.; SANTOS, G. A. Dos; RUOCCO, H. H.; SOARES NETO, H.; VECINO, M. C. De; BOAVENTURA, M.; DIAS, R. M.; GOMES, S.; CASTRO, A.; D'ALMEIDA, J. A.; ROCHA, L.; PIMENTEL, M. L.; PITOMBEIRA, M.; ARAMBULA, O.; PEREIRA, V.; CABECA, H.; GONCALVES, M. V.; DIAS-CARNEIRO, R.; FERREIRA, L.; GUIMARAES, R.; FORTALEZA, C. M.; DINIZ, D.; GRZESIUK, A.; KAIMEN-MACIEL, D. R.; COMINI-FROTA, E.; OLIVAL, G. Do; SIQUEIRA, H. H.; SATO, H.; CALIA, L.; MELGES, L. D.; DOURADO JUNIOR, M. E.; RIBEIRO, M.; SOUSA, M. A.; PAROLIN, M.; GAMA, P. Da; MORALES, R.; SOBREIRA, S.; MACHADO, S.; RIBEIRO, T.; FUKUDA, T.; COSTA, V.; VIEIRA, V. L.; PERIN, M.; NOBREGA JUNIOR, A. Da; MOREIRA, A. J.; DISSEROL, C. C.; SILVA, C. De Oliveira E; PEIXOTO, C. A.; PUGLIESI, E.; MIOT, H.; FIGUEIREDO JUNIOR, J. A.; AMORIM, L.; SCOLARI, L.; FEO, L.; MENDES, L.; MACHADO, M. I.; CATAO, R.; MENON, R.; DONADI, E.; CALLEGARO, D.; FRAGOSO, Y.; ADONI, T.; GLEHN, F. Von; BRUM, D.
  • article 7 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Management of central nervous system demyelinating diseases during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a practical approach
    (2020) APOSTOLOS-PEREIRA, Samira Luisa; SILVA, Guilherme Diogo; DISSEROL, Caio Cesar Diniz; FEO, Lucas Bueno; MATOS, Aline de Moura Brasil; SCHOEPS, Vinicius Andreoli; GOMES, Ana Beatriz Ayroza Galvao Ribeiro; BOAVENTURA, Mateus; MENDES, Maria Fernanda; CALLEGARO, Dagoberto
    Background: The novelcoronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) pandemic poses a potential threattopatients with autoimmune disorders, including multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Such patients are usually treated with immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive agents, which may tamper with the organism's normal response to infections. Currently, noconsensus has been reached on how to manage MS and NMOSD patients during the pandemic. Objective: To discuss strategies to manage those patients. Methods: We focus on how to 1) reduce COVID-19 infection risk, such as social distancing, telemedicine, and wider interval between laboratory testing/imaging; 2) manage relapses, such as avoiding treatment of mild relapse and using oral steroids; 3) manage disease-modifying therapies, such as preference for drugs associated with lower infection risk (interferons, glatiramer, teriflunomide, and natalizumab) and extended-interval dosing of natalizumab, when safe; 4) individualize the chosen MS induction-therapy (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, alemtuzumab, and cladribine); 5) manage NMOSD preventive therapies, including initial therapy selection and current treatment maintenance; 6) manage MS/NMOSD patients infected with COVID-19. Conclusions: In the future, real-world case series of MS/NMOSD patients infected with COVID-19 will help us define the best management strategies. For the time being, we rely on expert experience and guidance.