MATHEUS MENDONCA PERES

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
0
Lattes
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
FMUSP, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • conferenceObject
    Semantic fluency impairment in unilateral mesial temporal sclerosis related epilepsy is associated with extensive white matter involvement: a diffusion tensor imaging study
    (2017) PERES, Matheus; CASTRO, Bettina; MESSAS, Cristiane; MARTUCCI, Caio; CHAIM, Khalil; PASTORELLO, Bruno; VALERIO, Rosa; JORGE, Carmen; LYRA, Katarina; OTADUY, Maria; LEITE, Claudia; CASTRO, Luiz
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    EVALUATION OF MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES BY ORTHOPEDIC RESIDENTS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
    (2022) OCAMPOS, Guilherme pereira; PERES, Matheus Mendonca; REZENDE, Marcia Uchoa de; AROUCA, Matheus Manolo; CAMARGO, Olavo Pires de
    Objective: To assess whether residents (R1, R2, or R3 -according to the year of residency) of a tertiary orthopedic service inves-tigate, treat and/or refer the patient with osteoporotic fracture for osteoporosis (OP) treatment and whether this learning is improved over the years of residency. Methods: Residents answered diagnostic and therapeutic questions related to a clinical case of osteoporotic fracture (OF) in 4 settings, which were initial care in the emergency room, at discharge, during out-patient follow-up at 3 and 6 months. Responses were compared between years of residency. Results: Twenty R1, 21 R2, and 19 R3 raised the questions. One resident treated osteoporosis in R1, two in R2, and four in R3. Seventy-five percent of R1, 90.5% of R2, and 68% of R3 referred patients for OP treatment. Over the years, there has been improved prescribing lab tests for osteoporosis (p = 0.028), with 52.6% of third-year residents prescribing adequate lab tests. In the same period, 100% of R3 correctly prescribed prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis (p = 0.001). Conclusion: There is learning, but not enough, for secondary prevention of FO. Level of Evidence I; Prospective Comparative Study.