Microsurgery versus embolization: different risk factors for short- and long- term outcomes of patients with ruptured aneurysms

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2022
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA
Citação
ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, v.37, n.8, article ID e370806, 9p, 2022
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Purpose: To evaluate the risk factors for poor outcomes after surgical and endovascular treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Methods: Patients with ??? 18-years of age and aSAH were included, while patients who died within 12 h of admission or lost follow-up were excluded. All participants underwent standardized clinical and radiological assessment on admission and were reassessed at discharge and at 6-months follow-up using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Results: Death at discharge was associated with female gender, anterior communication artery (ACoA) aneurysm location and presence of atherosclerotic plaque in the surgical group, and with age in the endovascular group. Both groups had clinical condition on follow-up associated with mFisher score on admission and hypertension. GOS on follow-up was also associated with presence of atherosclerotic plaque and multiple aneurysms in surgical group, and with age in endovascular group. Conclusion: Subjects treated surgically are prone to unfavorable outcomes if atherosclerotic plaques and multiple aneurysms are present. In patients with endovascular treatment, age was the main predictor of clinical outcome.
Palavras-chave
Intracranial Aneurysm, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Plaque, Atherosclerotic, Aneurysms, Follow-Up Studies, Prognosis
Referências
  1. Asilturk M, 2018, NEUROL NEUROCHIR POL, V52, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.pjnns.2017.09.005
  2. Brinjikji W, 2013, AM J NEURORADIOL, V34, P1022, DOI 10.3174/ajnr.A3321
  3. Brisman JL, 2006, NEW ENGL J MED, V355, P928, DOI 10.1056/NEJMra052760
  4. Connolly ES, 2012, STROKE, V43, P1711, DOI 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839
  5. De Marchis GM, 2014, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V85, P56, DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305051
  6. Drenjancevic-Peric I, 2005, AM J PHYSIOL-HEART C, V289, pH188, DOI 10.1152/ajpheart.00504.2004
  7. Eskesen V, 1987, Br J Neurosurg, V1, P455, DOI 10.3109/02688698708999636
  8. Hutter BO, 1999, ACT NEUR S, V72, P157
  9. Hutter BO, 2001, J NEUROSURG, V94, P241, DOI 10.3171/jns.2001.94.2.0241
  10. Jaja BNR, 2015, J NEUROSURG, V122, P644, DOI 10.3171/2014.10.JNS132694
  11. Juvela S, 2005, J NEUROSURG, V102, P998, DOI 10.3171/jns.2005.102.6.0998
  12. Kocur D, 2018, CLIN NEUROL NEUROSUR, V165, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.006
  13. Lawton MT, 2017, NEW ENGL J MED, V377, P257, DOI 10.1056/NEJMcp1605827
  14. Lee YJ, 2015, NEURORADIOLOGY, V57, P35, DOI 10.1007/s00234-014-1437-9
  15. Molyneux A, 2002, LANCET, V360, P1267, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6
  16. Molyneux AJ, 2015, LANCET, V385, P691, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60975-2
  17. Nguyen TN, 2008, J NEUROSURG, V108, P1088, DOI 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/6/1088
  18. Nieuwkamp DJ, 2009, LANCET NEUROL, V8, P635, DOI 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70126-7
  19. Nuki Y, 2009, HYPERTENSION, V54, P1337, DOI 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.138297
  20. Ohkuma H, 2003, CIRCULATION, V108, P785, DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087339.31094.3C
  21. Pierot L, 2010, RADIOLOGY, V256, P916, DOI 10.1148/radiol.10092209
  22. Proust F, 2010, J NEUROSURG, V112, P1200, DOI 10.3171/2009.10.JNS08754
  23. Shirao S, 2010, CEREBROVASC DIS, V30, P105, DOI 10.1159/000314713
  24. Steiner T, 2013, CEREBROVASC DIS, V35, P93, DOI 10.1159/000346087
  25. Wartenberg KE, 2006, CRIT CARE MED, V34, P617, DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000201903.46435.35
  26. Zheng JF, 2018, ACTA NEUROCHIR, V160, P2401, DOI 10.1007/s00701-018-3699-1
  27. Zheng K, 2019, FRONT NEUROL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fneur.2019.00123