Caregivers' perceptions on routine childhood vaccination: A qualitative study on vaccine hesitancy in a South Brazil state capital

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_MATOS_Caregivers_perceptions_on_routine_childhood_vaccination_A_qualitative_2024.PDF (1.28 MB)
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2024
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
Autores
ODUWOLE, Elizabeth O.
WIYSONGE, Charles Shey
Citação
HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, v.20, n.1, article ID 2298562, 9p, 2024
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Immunization programs worldwide have been facing challenges in keeping vaccination coverage high. Even though universally known for its robust National Immunization Program, Brazil has also faced significant challenges regarding vaccination coverage. One of the reasons for this is vaccine hesitancy, a complex, multi-causal, and context-specific phenomenon. This qualitative study aims to understand the factors associated with decision-making and the drivers of vaccine hesitancy in Florianopolis, Santa Catarina state capital, regarding caregivers' perceptions of routine childhood vaccination. In-depth interviews were conducted in the Capital city of Santa Catarina State. Families with children up to 6 years old were included. Data were analyzed based on thematic content analysis. Twenty-nine caregivers in 18 families were interviewed. These caregivers were mainly mothers and fathers. Three themes emerged: 1. Access to information and the decision-making process, where we discuss the role of social circles, healthcare workers, and the internet; 2. Individual-institutions power relationships: Perceptions about the State's role and the Health institutions: 3. Reasons and motivations: The senses and meanings behind non-vaccination, where we discuss the drivers of vaccine hesitancy related to risk perception, caregivers' opinions on the medical-pharmaceutical industry, vaccines' composition and their side effects, families' lifestyles and worldviews, and the childhood routine vaccination schedule. The results of this study reaffirm the complexity of the decision-making process in childhood vaccination and further enable a better contextual understanding of the complex and challenging phenomenon of vaccine hesitancy.
Palavras-chave
Vaccination, immunization, vaccine hesitancy, childhood health, qualitative research, Brazil
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/58014
Referências
  1. Barbieri CLA, 2015, REV SAUDE PUBL, V49, DOI 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005149
  2. [Anonymous], 2020, LANCET INFECT DIS, V20, P875, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30565-X
  3. [Anonymous], 2022, IBGE Cidades
  4. Attwell K, 2018, SOC SCI MED, V196, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.022
  5. Barata RB, 2012, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V66, P934, DOI 10.1136/jech-2011-200341
  6. Barbieri CLA., 2014, Cuidado infantil e (nao) vacinacao no contexto de familias de camadas medias em
  7. Becker H., 1992, Metodos de pesquisa em ciencias sociais, V1
  8. Brasil, 2019, Informacoes em saude (TABNET)-DATASUS
  9. Brasil, 2013, Programa Nacional de Imunizacoes (PNI): 40 anos
  10. Brown AL, 2018, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V34, DOI [10.1590/0102-311X00011618, 10.1590/0102-311x00011618]
  11. Cinelli M, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5
  12. de SA MC., 2023, Rev Bras Med Familia e Comunidade [Internet], V18, P3128
  13. Matos CCDA, 2022, GLOB PUBLIC HEALTH, V17, P1087, DOI 10.1080/17441692.2021.1912138
  14. Deml MJ, 2019, SOC SCI MED, V240, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112556
  15. Denzin N.K., 2008, Handbook o f qualitative research, P1
  16. Fernandez M, 2022, LANCET REG HEALTH-AM, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100246
  17. Fontana A., 2004, Handbook of qualitative research, P61
  18. Gomes R., 2002, Pesquisa social: teoria, metodo e criatividade, P67
  19. Guzman-Holst A, 2020, VACCINE, V38, P470, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.088
  20. Hochman G., 2011, Cienc saude coletiva, V16, P375, DOI [10.1590/S1413-81232011000200002, DOI 10.1590/S1413-81232011000200002]
  21. Joao Pinheiro F., 2022, Instituto de Pesquisa Economica Aplicada (IPEA). Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano no Brasil
  22. Kuan CI, 2022, SOCIOL HEALTH ILL, V44, P692, DOI 10.1111/1467-9566.13446
  23. Lafnitzegger Andrea, 2022, Adv Pediatr, V69, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.yapd.2022.03.011
  24. Larson HJ, 2014, VACCINE, V32, P2150, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.081
  25. Li AJ, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0230783
  26. Lupton DA, 2011, HEALTH RISK SOC, V13, P637, DOI 10.1080/13698575.2011.624179
  27. MacDonald NE, 2015, VACCINE, V33, P4161, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036
  28. Moulin AM, 2007, M S-MED SCI, V23, P428
  29. Moulin Anne Marie, 2003, Hist. cienc. saude-Manguinhos, V10, P499, DOI 10.1590/S0104-59702003000500004
  30. Neale J, 2016, ADDICTION, V111, P1096, DOI 10.1111/add.13314
  31. Nuwarda RF, 2022, VACCINES-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/vaccines10101595
  32. Oduwole EO, 2022, VACCINES-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/vaccines10081198
  33. Oduwole EO, 2022, VACCINES-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/vaccines10030453
  34. Oduwole EO, 2021, VACCINE, V39, P5506, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.054
  35. Pan American Health Organization, 2018, 30 anos de SUS, que SUS para 2030?
  36. Pertwee E, 2022, NAT MED, V28, P456, DOI 10.1038/s41591-022-01728-z
  37. Reich JA, 2014, GENDER SOC, V28, P679, DOI 10.1177/0891243214532711
  38. Ringel MM., 2018, Belief systems and the perception of reality, P9, DOI [10.1111/j.16512227.2007.00343.x, DOI 10.1111/J.16512227.2007.00343.X]
  39. Romano JO., 2022, A America Latina frente ao Governo da COVID-19, P353
  40. Sato APS, 2018, REV SAUDE PUBL, V52, DOI 10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052001199
  41. Stoeckel F, 2022, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V32, P636, DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckac041
  42. TenHouten WD., 2017, Bull Sociol Methodol/Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique, V134, P58, DOI [10.1177/0759106317693790, DOI 10.1177/0759106317693790]
  43. Vaismoradi, 2016, J NURSING ED PRACTIC, DOI [10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100, DOI 10.5430/JNEP.V6N5P100]
  44. Velho G., 1987, Individualismo e cultura: notas para uma antropologia da sociedade contemporanea, V2ed
  45. Verger P, 2022, EXPERT REV VACCINES, V21, P909, DOI 10.1080/14760584.2022.2056026
  46. Wilson SL, 2020, BMJ GLOB HEALTH, V5, DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004206
  47. Wiysonge CS, 2022, HUM VACC IMMUNOTHER, V18, P1, DOI 10.1080/21645515.2021.1893062
  48. World Health Organization, 2022, Behavioural and social drivers of vaccination: tools and practical guidance for achieving high uptake
  49. World Health Organization, 2014, Report of the SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MPR
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/38
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/09