Influence of Suture on Peripheral Nerve Regeneration and Collagen Production at the Site of Neurorrhaphy: An Experimental Study

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
17
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2011
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Citação
NEUROSURGERY, v.68, n.3, p.765-772, 2011
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
BACKGROUND: Restoration of nerve continuity and effective maintenance of coaptation are considered fundamental principles of end-to-end peripheral nerve repair. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of the number of stitches on axonal regeneration and collagen production after neurorrhaphy. METHODS: Thirty male Wistar rats were equally divided into 3 groups and were all operated on with the right sciatic nerve exposed. In 2 groups, the nerve was sectioned and repaired by means of 3 (group B) or 6 (group C) epineurium sutures with 100 monofilament nylon. One group (group A) was used as a control. Each animal from groups B and C underwent electrophysiological evaluation with motor action potential recordings before nerve section and again at an 8-week interval after neurorrhaphy. Nerve biopsy specimens were used for histomorphometric assessment of axonal regeneration and quantification of collagen at the repair site. RESULTS: Animals from group C had significantly lower motor action potential conduction velocities compared with control animals (P = .02), and no significant difference was seen between groups B and C. Parameters obtained from morphometric evaluation were not significantly different between these 2 groups. Type I collagen and III collagen in the epineurium were significantly higher in group C than in either the control group (P = .001 and P = .003) or group B (P = .01 and P = .02). No differences were identified for collagen I and III in the endoneurium. CONCLUSION: Using 6 sutures for nerve repair is associated with worse electrophysiological outcomes and higher amounts of type I and III collagen in the epineurium compared with control. Neurorraphy with 6 stitches is also related to a significant increase in epineurium collagen I and III compared with 3-stitch neurorraphy.
Palavras-chave
Collagen, Extracellular matrix, Neurorrhaphy, Peripheral nerve, Rat sciatic nerve, Sutures, Suture techniques
Referências
  1. Amara B, 2000, J RECONSTR MICROSURG, V16, P563, DOI 10.1055/s-2000-8396
  2. MACKINNON SE, 1991, MUSCLE NERVE, V14, P1116, DOI 10.1002/mus.880141113
  3. CAREY DJ, 1983, J CELL BIOL, V97, P473, DOI 10.1083/jcb.97.2.473
  4. MILLER EJ, 1982, METHOD ENZYMOL, V82, P33
  5. Platt CI, 2003, J NEUROSCI RES, V74, P417, DOI 10.1002/jnr.10783
  6. Sund M, 2001, MATRIX BIOL, V20, P215, DOI 10.1016/S0945-053X(01)00134-2
  7. VANWINKLE W, 1975, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V140, P7
  8. de Ruiter GCW, 2008, EXP NEUROL, V211, P339, DOI 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.12.023
  9. Menovsky T, 2001, J NEUROSURG, V95, P694, DOI 10.3171/jns.2001.95.4.0694
  10. Atkins S, 2006, J PERIPHER NERV SYST, V11, P286, DOI 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2006.00100.x
  11. Muona A, 2002, MATRIX BIOL, V21, P89, DOI 10.1016/S0945-053X(01)00187-1
  12. Chernousov MA, 2008, GLIA, V56, P1498, DOI 10.1002/glia.20740
  13. Dahlin LB, 2008, CURR ORTHOPAED, V22, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.cuor.2008.01.002
  14. Veit G, 2006, J BIOL CHEM, V281, P3494, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M509333200
  15. Hubert T, 2007, MATRIX BIOL, V26, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.matbio.2006.10.011
  16. Atkins S, 2007, J PERIPHER NERV SYST, V12, P269, DOI 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2007.00148.x
  17. Menovsky T, 2003, MICROSURG, V23, P109, DOI 10.1002/micr.10100
  18. IJkema-Paassen J, 2004, BIOMATERIALS, V25, P1583, DOI 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00504-0
  19. Atkins S, 2006, NEUROREPORT, V17, P1245, DOI 10.1097/01.wnr.0000230519.39456.ea
  20. BENNETT RG, 1988, J AM ACAD DERMATOL, V18, P619, DOI 10.1016/S0190-9622(88)70083-3
  21. BRATTON BR, 1981, J SURG RES, V31, P482, DOI 10.1016/0022-4804(81)90186-4
  22. Brown D G, 1968, Tex Med, V64, P52
  23. CHAM RB, 1984, J HAND SURG-AM, V9A, P434
  24. DeLee J C, 1977, J Hand Surg Am, V2, P38
  25. Harlow E, 1988, ANTIBODIES LAB MANUA
  26. Hill R, 2009, J ANAT, V214, P219, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.01026.x
  27. Hill RE, 2002, J ANAT, V201, P185, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00083.x
  28. Hudson A R, 1976, Can J Neurol Sci, V3, P69
  29. KLINE DG, 1964, J NEUROSURG, V21, P737, DOI 10.3171/jns.1964.21.9.0737
  30. Martins RS, 2005, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V63, P601, DOI 10.1590/S0004-282X2005000400009
  31. Martins RS, 2005, SURG NEUROL, V64, pS10, DOI 10.1016/j.surneu.2005.04.022
  32. MILLESI H, 1984, Annales de Chirurgie de la Main, V3, P18, DOI 10.1016/S0753-9053(84)80058-7
  33. MYERS RR, 1986, MICROVASC RES, V32, P145, DOI 10.1016/0026-2862(86)90050-6
  34. Nath RK, 1998, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V102, P1100, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199809040-00027
  35. Nath RK, 1997, J NEUROSURG, V86, P866, DOI 10.3171/jns.1997.86.5.0866
  36. Park JW, 2002, MICROSURG, V22, P386, DOI 10.1002/micr.10072
  37. Parra ER, 2007, THORAX, V62, P428, DOI 10.1136/thx.2006.062687
  38. Pierucci A, 2009, J MATER SCI-MATER M, V20, P489, DOI 10.1007/s10856-008-3614-z
  39. PINEROSFERNA N, 2005, ANN PLAST SURG, V55, P188
  40. Chernousov MA, 2000, J BIOL CHEM, V275, P28208
  41. SEYER JM, 1977, BIOCHIM BIOPHYS ACTA, V492, P415, DOI 10.1016/0005-2795(77)90093-9
  42. SIIRONEN J, 1992, LAB INVEST, V67, P80
  43. SIIRONEN J, 1995, ACTA NEUROPATHOL, V89, P219
  44. SMAHEL J, 1987, Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, V3, P211, DOI 10.1055/s-2007-1006987
  45. SUNDERLAND SS, 1991, NERVE INJURIES THEIR, P395
  46. SZAL GJ, 1975, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V101, P160
  47. Teodoro WR, 2003, CONNECT TISSUE RES, V44, P96, DOI 10.1080/03008200390200238