Neuroscience Knowledge and Endorsement of Neuromyths among Educators: What Is the Scenario in Brazil?
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
4
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2022
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
MDPI
Autores
FOZ, Adriana
MARQUES, Alcione
SATO, Joao
Citação
BRAIN SCIENCES, v.12, n.6, article ID 734, 18p, 2022
Resumo
The field of neuroscience has seen significant growth and interest in recent decades. While neuroscience knowledge can benefit laypeople as well as professionals in many different areas, it may be particularly relevant for educators. With the right information, educators can apply neuroscience-based teaching strategies as well as protect themselves and their students against pseudoscientific ideas and products based on them. Despite rapidly growing sources of available information and courses, studies show that educators in many countries have poor knowledge of brain science and tend to endorse education-related neuromyths. Poor English skills and fewer resources (personal, institutional and governmental) may be additional limitations in Latin America. In order to better understand the scenario in Latin America's largest country, we created an anonymous online survey which was answered by 1634 individuals working in education from all five regions of Brazil. Respondents stated whether they agreed with each statement and reported their level of confidence for each answer. Significant differences in performance were observed across regions, between educators living in capital cities versus the outskirts, between those teaching in private versus public schools, and among educators teaching different levels (pre-school up to college/university). We also observed high endorsement of some key neuromyths, even among groups who performed better overall. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to conduct a detailed analysis of the profile of a large group of educators in Brazil. We discuss our findings in terms of efforts to better understand regional and global limitations and develop methods of addressing these most efficiently.
Palavras-chave
neuroeducation, neuromyths, science education, pseudoscience, fake news, science literacy
Referências
- [Anonymous], MINISTERIO SAUDE BRA
- Arevalo A, 2022, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V16, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2022.798967
- Blackwell LS, 2007, CHILD DEV, V78, P246, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
- Bowers JS, 2016, PSYCHOL REV, V123, P600, DOI 10.1037/rev0000025
- Chiou L., 2018, Working Paper Series - National Bureau of Economic Research (Massachusetts)
- Crowley SJ, 2007, SLEEP MED, V8, P602, DOI 10.1016/j.sleep.2006.12.002
- Dekker S, 2012, FRONT PSYCHOL, V3, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429
- Dubinsky JM, 2019, NEUROSCIENTIST, V25, P394, DOI 10.1177/1073858419835447
- Dubinsky JM, 2013, EDUC RESEARCHER, V42, P317, DOI 10.3102/0013189X13499403
- Dubinsky JM, 2010, J NEUROSCI, V30, P8057, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2322-10.2010
- EBC Taxa Cai Levemente, MAS BRAS AIND TEM 11
- Feiler JB, 2018, TRENDS NEUROSCI EDUC, V13, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.tine.2018.11.001
- Ferrero M, 2016, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V10, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00496
- Gleichgerrcht E, 2015, MIND BRAIN EDUC, V9, P170, DOI 10.1111/mbe.12086
- Grupo de Midia, 2019, SP MID DAD
- Gupta S, 2017, J RES PRACT, V13
- Herculano-Houzel S, 2002, NEUROSCIENTIST, V8, P98, DOI 10.1177/107385840200800206
- Hermida MJ, 2016, EDUC RES-UK, V58, P457, DOI 10.1080/00131881.2016.1238585
- Hirsh-Pasek K, 2007, SCIENCE, V317, P1293, DOI 10.1126/science.1148983
- Howard-Jones P.A., 2009, NEUROSCIENCE LITERAC
- Howard-Jones PA, 2014, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V15, P817, DOI 10.1038/nrn3817
- IBGE, AG BRAS POP BRAS
- ibge, 2018, IBGE PESQUISA NACL A
- IBGE IBGE, PORT IBGE
- Im SH, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0192163
- Kirby M, 2011, EDUC RESEARCHER, V40, P56, DOI 10.3102/0013189X11402323
- Lavorgna L, 2018, MULT SCLER RELAT DIS, V25, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.msard.2018.07.046
- Macdonald K, 2017, FRONT PSYCHOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01314
- Markram H, 2013, FUNCT NEUROL, V28, P145, DOI [10.11138/FNeur/2013.28.3.144, 10.11138/FNeur/2013.28.3.145]
- Merchant RM, 2018, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V320, P2415, DOI 10.1001/jama.2018.18416
- Newton PM, 2015, FRONT PSYCHOL, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01908
- OECD, 2002, UNDERSTANDING BRAIN, DOI [10.1787/9789264174986-en, DOI 10.1787/9789264174986-EN]
- Papadatou-Pastou M, 2017, FRONT PSYCHOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00804
- Peters MA, 2017, EDUC PHILOS THEORY, V49, P563, DOI 10.1080/00131857.2016.1264114
- portal, IGC INDICE GERAL CUR
- Rato JR, 2013, EDUC RES-UK, V55, P441, DOI 10.1080/00131881.2013.844947
- Roenneberg T, 2007, SLEEP MED REV, V11, P429, DOI 10.1016/j.smrv.2007.07.005
- Sousa A., 2017, REV PSICOPEDAG, V34, P320
- Strike K. A., 2002, ETHICAL STANDARDS AM
- Tardif E, 2015, MIND BRAIN EDUC, V9, P50, DOI 10.1111/mbe.12070
- Terrell SR, 2012, QUAL REP, V17, P254
- Thomas MSC, 2019, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V60, P477, DOI 10.1111/jcpp.12973
- Torrijos-Muelas M, 2021, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591923
- Troxel WM, 2017, SLEEP HEALTH, V3, P419, DOI 10.1016/j.sleh.2017.10.001
- Wahlstrom K, 2014, EXAMINING IMPACT LAT
- Wahlstrom KL, 2017, SLEEP HEALTH, V3, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.sleh.2017.03.002
- wearesocial, WE ARE SOCIAL DIGITA
- Weisberg DS, 2008, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V20, P470, DOI 10.1162/jocn.2008.20.3.470
- Wittmann M, 2006, CHRONOBIOL INT, V23, P497, DOI 10.1080/07420520500545979
- Zambo D., 2009, TEACHING ED PSYCHOL, V5, P39