Routine postoperative computed tomography scan after craniotomy: systematic review and evidence-based recommendations

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_BLUMRICH_Routine_postoperative_computed_tomography_scan_after_craniotomy_systematic_2021.PDF (764.24 KB)
Citações na Scopus
6
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2021
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER
Autores
Citação
NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, v.44, n.5, p.2523-2531, 2021
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Over the last few years, the role of early postoperative computed tomography (EPOCT) after cranial surgery has been repeatedly questioned, but there is yet no consensus on the practice. We conducted a systematic review to address the usefulness of EPOCT in association with neurological examination after elective craniotomies compared to the neurological examination alone. Studies were eligible if they provided information about the number of patients scanned, how many were asymptomatic or presented neurological deterioration before the scan and how many of each of those groups had their management changed due to imaging findings. CTs had to be performed in the first 48 h following surgery to be considered early. Eight studies were included. The retrospective studies enrolled a total of 3639 patients, with 3737 imaging examinations. Out of the 3696 CT scans performed in asymptomatic patients, less than 0.8% prompted an intervention, while 100% of patients with neurological deterioration were submitted to emergency surgery. Positive predictive values of altered scans were 0.584 for symptomatic patients and 0.125 for the asymptomatic. The number of altered scans necessary to predict (NNP) one change in management for the asymptomatic patients was 8, while for the clinically evident cases, it was 1.71. The number of scans needed to diagnose one clinically silent alteration is 134.75, and postoperative imaging of neurologically intact patients is 132 times less likely to issue an emergency intervention than an altered neurological examination alone. EPOCT following elective craniotomy in neurologically preserved patients is not supported by current evidence, and CT scanning should be performed only in particular conditions. The authors have developed an algorithm to help the judgment of each patient by the surgeon in a resource-limited context.
Palavras-chave
Craniotomy, Tomography, Spiral computed, Neurosurgery, Critical care
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/42270
Referências
  1. Alkhalili K, 2018, WORLD NEUROSURG, V111, pE199, DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.038
  2. Almohiy H, 2014, WORLD J RADIOL, V6, P1, DOI 10.4329/wjr.v6.i1.1
  3. ANDREWS PJD, 1990, LANCET, V335, P327, DOI 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90614-B
  4. Ashley WW, 2005, J NEUROSURG, V103, P124, DOI 10.3171/ped.2005.103.2.0124
  5. Bekar A, 1998, NEUROSURG REV, V21, P98, DOI 10.1007/BF02389312
  6. Benveniste RJ, 2014, J NEURO-ONCOL, V118, P363, DOI 10.1007/s11060-014-1440-3
  7. Bergsneider M, 2006, J NEUROSURG, V104, P157, DOI 10.3171/ped.2006.104.3.157
  8. Binning M, 2007, J NEUROSURG, V107, P43, DOI 10.3171/PED-07/07/043
  9. Boyle TP, 2014, PEDIATRICS, V134, pE47, DOI 10.1542/peds.2013-3739
  10. Bramer WM, 2017, SYST REV-LONDON, V6, DOI 10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y
  11. Brenner DJ, 2007, NEW ENGL J MED, V357, P2277, DOI 10.1056/NEJMra072149
  12. Courtemanche DJ, 2017, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V75, P770, DOI 10.1016/j.joms.2016.12.024
  13. Fontes RBV, 2014, J NEUROSURG, V121, P307, DOI 10.3171/2014.4.JNS132429
  14. Freyschlag CF, 2019, WORLD NEUROSURG, V122, pE1426, DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.079
  15. Garrett MC, 2013, NEUROSURGERY, V73, P209, DOI 10.1227/01.neu.0000430328.25516.dd
  16. Gessler F, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0124534
  17. Girotti ME, VENTRICULO GALLBLADD
  18. Goeser CD, 1998, RADIOGRAPHICS, V18, P635, DOI 10.1148/radiographics.18.3.9599388
  19. Guyatt GH, 2008, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V336, P995, DOI 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE
  20. Guyatt GH, 2008, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V336, P1049, DOI 10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.AE
  21. Guyatt GH, 2008, BRIT MED J, V336, P924, DOI 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
  22. Hall EJ, 2012, BRIT J RADIOL, V85, pE1316, DOI 10.1259/bjr/13739950
  23. Huang WY, 2014, BRIT J CANCER, V110, P2354, DOI 10.1038/bjc.2014.103
  24. Hulsbergen AFC, 2019, WORLD NEUROSURG, V125, P527, DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.085
  25. Hussain SA, 2001, BRIT J NEUROSURG, V15, P116
  26. Iskandar BJ, 2004, J NEUROSURG, V101, P147, DOI 10.3171/ped.2004.101.2.0147
  27. Jiang ZY, 2013, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V149, P786, DOI 10.1177/0194599813502311
  28. Khaldi A, 2010, J NEUROSURG, V113, P1021, DOI 10.3171/2009.11.JNS081048
  29. Kim I, 2015, PEDIATR EMERG CARE, V31, P239, DOI 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000248
  30. Kleffmann J, 2016, NEUROCRIT CARE, V25, P440, DOI 10.1007/s12028-016-0274-6
  31. Levitt MR, 2012, J NEUROSURG-PEDIATR, V10, P112, DOI 10.3171/2012.3.PEDS122
  32. Linn Shai, 2006, Epidemiol Perspect Innov, V3, P11, DOI 10.1186/1742-5573-3-11
  33. Longenecker AS, 2017, J ARTHROPLASTY, V32, P1431, DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.033
  34. Lovell MA, 2001, ANAESTH INTENS CARE, V29, P400, DOI 10.1177/0310057X0102900412
  35. Maller VV, 2016, SEMIN ULTRASOUND CT, V37, P159, DOI 10.1053/j.sult.2016.01.003
  36. Mendelson ZS, 2017, AM J RHINOL ALLERGY, V31, P186, DOI 10.2500/ajra.2017.31.4429
  37. Moher D, 2010, INT J SURG, V8, P336, DOI [10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007]
  38. Murphy RJ, 2007, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V89, P281, DOI 10.1308/003588407X179035
  39. Nadimi S, 2014, INT FORUM ALLERGY RH, V4, P1024, DOI 10.1002/alr.21405
  40. Nakaura T, 2016, NEURORADIOLOGY, V58, P245, DOI 10.1007/s00234-015-1631-4
  41. O'Neill BR, 2013, WORLD NEUROSURG, V80, pE307, DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.10.066
  42. O'Sullivan JW, 2018, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V361, DOI 10.1136/bmj.k2387
  43. Ozdoba C, 2014, CLIN NEURORADIOL, V24, P23, DOI 10.1007/s00062-013-0263-5
  44. Paci GM, 2008, J TRAUMA, V64, P326, DOI 10.1097/TA.0b013e318163358a
  45. Pearce MS, 2012, LANCET, V380, P499, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0
  46. Picetti E, 2013, NEUROCRIT CARE, V18, P298, DOI 10.1007/s12028-012-9802-1
  47. Schar RT, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0153499
  48. Schucht P, 2019, NEW ENGL J MED, V380, P1186, DOI 10.1056/NEJMc1812507
  49. Schunemann HJ, 2008, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V336, P1106, DOI 10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.AE
  50. Sterne JAC, 2016, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V355, DOI 10.1136/bmj.i4919
  51. US Department of Health and Human Services, 2020, DEFINITIONS QEIOS
  52. Weil AG, 2014, J NEUROSURG-PEDIATR, V13, P585, DOI 10.3171/2013.12.PEDS13624
  53. Weizer AZ, 2002, J UROLOGY, V168, P46, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64829-X
  54. Wen L, 2016, ACTA NEUROCHIR, V158, P1447, DOI 10.1007/s00701-016-2883-4
  55. Zygourakis CC, 2017, J NEUROSURG, V126, P558, DOI 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152242

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MNE
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICESP
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/62