Core needle biopsy in fibroepithelial tumors: predicting factors for phyllodes tumors

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_REIS_Core_needle_biopsy_in_fibroepithelial_tumors_predicting_factors_2021.PDF (226.99 KB)
Citações na Scopus
3
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2021
DOI
SciELO
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
Autores
Citação
CLINICS, v.76, article ID e2806, 4p, 2021
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and imaging predictive factors for the diagnosis of phyllodes tumors in patients with inconclusive results from core needle biopsy (fibroepithelial lesions). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of patients who underwent surgical excision of breast lesions previously diagnosed as fibroepithelial lesions. Numeric variables were analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk and t-tests, and categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to calculate odds ratios and detect predictive factors for the diagnosis of PT. RESULTS: A total of 89 biopsy samples were obtained from 77 patients, of which 43 were confirmed as fibroadenomas, 43 as phyllodes tumors, and 3 as other benign, non-fibroepithelial breast lesions. The mean tumor size was 3.61 cm (range, 0.8-10 cm) for phyllodes tumors and 2.4 cm (range, 0.8-7.9 cm) for fibroadenomas. The predictive factor for phyllodes tumor diagnosis was lesion size >3 cm (p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that fibroepithelial lesions of the breast larger than 3 cm are more likely to be phyllodes tumors.
Palavras-chave
Fibroepithelial Lesions, Phyllodes Tumor, Fibroadenoma, Breast Ultrasound, Core Needle Biopsy
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/40758
Referências
  1. Al-Arnawoot B, 2020, J SURG ONCOL, V122, P382, DOI 10.1002/jso.25977
  2. Bandyopadhyay S, 2016, HUM PATHOL, V47, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.09.001
  3. Chang J, 2018, ANN SURG ONCOL, V25, P3088, DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-6622-3
  4. Giri D, 2009, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V133, P713, DOI 10.1043/1543-2165-133.5.713
  5. Gould DJ, 2012, J SURG RES, V178, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2012.03.059
  6. Marcil G, 2017, AM J SURG, V214, P318, DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.12.017
  7. Resetkova E, 2010, BREAST J, V16, P573, DOI 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.01013.x
  8. Ricci MD, 2011, REV BRAS GINECOL OBS, V33, P27, DOI 10.1590/S0100-72032011000100004
  9. Tan PH, 2013, J CLIN PATHOL, V66, P465, DOI 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201078
  10. Van Osdol AD, 2014, JAMA SURG, V149, P1081, DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.73
  11. Wiratkapun C, 2014, DIAGN INTERV RADIOL, V20, P27, DOI 10.5152/dir.2013.13133
  12. Yasir S, 2014, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V142, P362, DOI 10.1309/AJCPZUZ96RESGPUP
  13. Youn I, 2013, ULTRASOUND MED BIOL, V39, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.01.004
  14. Zhou ZR, 2016, J THORAC DIS, V8, P3139, DOI 10.21037/jtd.2016.10.109

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOG
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICESP
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/24
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/58
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/03