Modelling the Force of Infection for Hepatitis A in an Urban Population-Based Survey: A Comparison of Transmission Patterns in Brazilian Macro-Regions

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
30
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Autores
XIMENES, Ricardo Arraes de Alencar
MARTELLI, Celina Maria Turchi
AMAKU, Marcos
PEREIRA, Leila Maria Moreira Beltrao
MOREIRA, Regina Celia
Citação
PLOS ONE, v.9, n.5, article ID e94622, 10p, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: This study aimed to identify the transmission pattern of hepatitis A (HA) infection based on a primary dataset from the Brazilian National Hepatitis Survey in a pre-vaccination context. The national survey conducted in urban areas disclosed two epidemiological scenarios with low and intermediate HA endemicity. Methods: A catalytic model of HA transmission was built based on a national seroprevalence survey (2005 to 2009). The seroprevalence data from 7,062 individuals aged 5-69 years from all the Brazilian macro-regions were included. We built up three models: fully homogeneous mixing model, with constant contact pattern; the highly assortative model and the highly assortative model with the additional component accounting for contacts with infected food/water. Curves of prevalence, force of infection (FOI) and the number of new infections with 99% confidence intervals (CIs) were compared between the intermediate (North, Northeast, Midwest and Federal District) and low (South and Southeast) endemicity areas. A contour plot was also constructed. Results: The anti-HAV IgG seroprevalence was 68.8% (95% CI, 64.8%-72.5%) and 33.7% (95% CI, 32.4%-35.1%) for the intermediate and low endemicity areas, respectively, according to the field data analysis. The models showed that a higher force of infection was identified in the 10- to 19-year-old age cohort (similar to 9,000 infected individuals per year per 100,000 susceptible persons) in the intermediate endemicity area, whereas a higher force of infection occurred in the 15-to 29-year-old age cohort (similar to 6,000 infected individuals per year per 100,000 susceptible persons) for the other macro-regions. Conclusion: Our findings support the shift of Brazil toward intermediate and low endemicity levels with the shift of the risk of infection to older age groups. These estimates of HA force of infection stratified by age and endemicity levels are useful information to characterize the pre-vaccination scenario in Brazil.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Ajelli M, 2008, VACCINE, V26, P1697, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.12.058
  2. Almeida LM, 2001, EPIDEMIOL INFECT, V127, P327
  3. Amaku M, 2009, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V104, P897, DOI 10.1590/S0074-02762009000600013
  4. Amaku M, 2010, MATH POPUL STUD, V17, P91, DOI 10.1080/08898481003689502
  5. Amaku M, 2003, PHYS REV E, V67, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.051907
  6. ANDERSON RM, 1985, J HYG-CAMBRIDGE, V94, P365
  7. Armstrong GL, 2002, PEDIATRICS, V109, P839, DOI 10.1542/peds.109.5.839
  8. Barreto ML, 2011, LANCET, V377, P1877, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60202-X
  9. Bell BP, 2005, VACCINE, V23, P5798, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.03.060
  10. Bell BP, 1998, J INFECT DIS, V178, P1579, DOI 10.1086/314518
  11. Braga WSM, 2009, REV SOC BRAS MED TRO, V42, P277, DOI 10.1590/S0037-86822009000300008
  12. Brasil, 2010, EST PREV BAS POP INF
  13. Burnham KP, 2002, MODEL SELECTION MULT, P60
  14. Clemens SAC, 2000, REV SOC BRAS MED TRO, V33
  15. de Guimaraens Mariana Alves, 2005, Cad Saude Publica, V21, P1531, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2005000500026
  16. de Almeida LM, 2002, T ROY SOC TROP MED H, V96, P605, DOI 10.1016/S0035-9203(02)90325-1
  17. Fumanelli L, 2012, PLOS COMPUT BIOL, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002673
  18. GRIFFITHS DA, 1974, J ROY STAT SOC C-APP, V23, P330
  19. Halloran ME, 2010, STAT BIOL HEALTH, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-68636-3
  20. IBGE, 2000, DEM CENS 2000 CHAR P
  21. IBGE, 2010, CENS 2010
  22. Jacobsen KH, 2010, VACCINE, V28, P6653, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.08.037
  23. Lafer Manuel Mindlin, 2007, Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, V49, P155, DOI 10.1590/S0036-46652007000300004
  24. Lopez E, 2007, J GASTROENTEROL, V42, P152, DOI 10.1007/s00535-006-1984-x
  25. Luiz RR, 2003, INT J HYG ENVIR HEAL, V206, P575, DOI 10.1078/1438-4639-00255
  26. Marschner IC, 1997, BIOMETRICS, V53, P1384, DOI 10.2307/2533505
  27. Martinelli D, 2010, VACCINE, V28, P6783, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.07.069
  28. Matos MAD, 2009, T ROY SOC TROP MED H, V103, P899, DOI 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.01.013
  29. Ministerio da saude, 2013, INF TECN INTR VAC AD
  30. Ministerio da Saude, 2008, HEP VIR BRAS EST AT
  31. Mossong J, 2008, PLOS MED, V5, P381, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050074
  32. R Development Core Team, 2011, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
  33. REMME J, 1984, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V13, P332, DOI 10.1093/ije/13.3.332
  34. Sartori AMC, 2012, VACCINE, V30, P7489, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.10.056
  35. Struchiner CJ, 1999, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V28, P776, DOI 10.1093/ije/28.4.776
  36. Tapia-Conyer R, 1999, AM J TROP MED HYG, V61, P825
  37. Vacchino MN, 2008, J VIRAL HEPATITIS, V15, P47, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.01029.x
  38. Valentim J, 2008, VACCINE, V26, P6281, DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.07.021
  39. Van Effelterre TP, 2006, CLIN INFECT DIS, V43, P158, DOI 10.1086/505115
  40. Victora CG, 2011, LANCET, V377, P1863, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60138-4
  41. Vitral CL, 2008, J VIRAL HEPATITIS, V15, P22, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.01024.x
  42. Vitral CL, 2006, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V101, P119, DOI 10.1590/S0074-02762006000200001
  43. Vitral CL, 1998, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V93, P1
  44. Vogt TM, 2008, J INFECT DIS, V197, P1282, DOI 10.1086/586899
  45. World Health Organization, 2012, WKLY EPIDEMIOL REC, V87, P261
  46. Ximenes RAD, 2010, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V26, P1693, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2010000900003
  47. Ximenes RAD, 2008, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V37, P852, DOI 10.1093/ije/dyn114
  48. Yu ALF, 2001, EPIDEMIOL INFECT, V127, P493