Sex differences in smoking cessation: a retrospective cohort study in a psychosocial care unit in Brazil

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ASSOC PSIQUIATRIA RIO GRANDE SUL
Autores
GUIMARAES-PEREIRA, Bruna Beatriz Sales
MARTINS-DA-SILVA, Anderson Sousa
CARVALHO, Carlos Felipe Cavalcanti
LORETO, Aline Rodrigues
GALVAO, Lucas Pequeno
FRALLONARDO, Fernanda Piotto
ISMAEL, Flavia
TORALES, Julio
VENTRIGLIO, Antonio
Citação
TRENDS IN PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY, v.45, article ID e20210217, 11p, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Introduction: Despite the results of epidemiological and psychometric studies reporting comparable levels of tobacco dependence among males and females, some clinical studies have detected disparities. Some smoking cessation studies based on clinical setting programs reported poorer outcomes among women than men.Methods: This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare treatment success and retention between men and women on a smoking cessation program (n=1,014) delivered at a CAPS-AD unit in Brazil. The psychological intervention lasted 6 weeks for each group of 15 patients. Each patient had to participate in weekly group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) sessions and individual medical appointments during this period. These appointments were focused on the possibility of prescribing pharmacological treatment (i.e., nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, or nortriptyline) as adjuvants to group therapy.Results: The women had lower smoking severity at baseline, more clinical symptoms, and lower prevalence of alcohol and drug use disorders and were older than the men. Females had significantly higher levels of success (36.6% vs. 29.7%) and retention (51.6% vs. 41.4%) than males. Sensitivity analysis showed that female gender was significantly associated with both retention and success, among those without drug use disorders only.Conclusion: Depending on the smoking cessation setting (i.e., low and middle-income countries and mental health and addiction care units), females can achieve similar and even higher quit rates than males. Previous drug use disorder was an important confounding variable in the gender outcomes analyses. Future studies should try to replicate these positive smoking cessation effects of CBT-based group therapy plus pharmacotherapy in women.
Palavras-chave
Tobacco use cessation, female, tobacco use disorder
Referências
  1. Allen SS, 2009, ADDICT BEHAV, V34, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.08.009
  2. Bold KW, 2015, ANN BEHAV MED, V49, P128, DOI 10.1007/s12160-014-9627-6
  3. Brasil. Ministerio da Saude (MS), 2020, VIG BRAS 2019 VIG FA
  4. Campbell BK, 2016, AM J DRUG ALCOHOL AB, V42, P649, DOI 10.1080/00952990.2016.1183021
  5. Castaldelli-Maia JM, 2021, BRAZ J PSYCHIAT, V43, P75, DOI 10.1590/1516-4446-2019-0782
  6. Castaldelli-Maia JM, 2018, PSYCHOL ADDICT BEHAV, V32, P415, DOI 10.1037/adb0000369
  7. Castaldelli-Maia JM, 2018, EUR PSYCHIAT, V52, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.02.005
  8. Castaldelli-Maia JM, 2018, PSYCHIAT RES, V266, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.018
  9. Castellani V, 2020, REV ASSOC MED BRAS, V66, P146, DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.66.2.146
  10. Cepeda-Benito A, 2004, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V72, P712, DOI 10.1037/0022-006X.72.4.712
  11. Chatkin JM, 2006, INT J TUBERC LUNG D, V10, P499
  12. Christofferson DE, 2021, NICOTINE TOB RES, V23, P931, DOI 10.1093/ntr/ntaa183
  13. Collins BN, 2004, NICOTINE TOB RES, V6, P27, DOI 10.1080/14622200310001656830
  14. Drope J., 2018, TOBACCO ATLAS
  15. Evans-Polce RJ, 2015, SOC SCI MED, V145, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.026
  16. Greaves L, 2015, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V12, P1449, DOI 10.3390/ijerph120201449
  17. Halperin AC, 2009, J SUBST ABUSE TREAT, V36, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.09.001
  18. Huang Y, 2013, TOB CONTROL, V22, P274, DOI 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050124
  19. Husky MM, 2007, J ADDICT MED, V1, P161, DOI 10.1097/ADM.0b013e318142d06c
  20. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica. [IBGE], 2015, PESQUISA NACL AMOSTR
  21. Jarvis MJ, 2013, TOB CONTROL, V22, P356, DOI 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050279
  22. Lancaster T., 2017, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V3, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD001292.pub3, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001292.PUB3]
  23. Lima DR, 2020, J PSYCHIATR RES, V125, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.03.014
  24. Loreto AR, 2017, J DUAL DIAGN, V13, P238, DOI 10.1080/15504263.2017.1328149
  25. Martinez-Vispo C, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17124317
  26. Pegington M, 2020, OBES REV, V21, DOI 10.1111/obr.13002
  27. Perkins KA, 2013, ADDICT BEHAV, V38, P1527, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.06.002
  28. Quisenberry AJ, 2019, DRUG ALCOHOL DEPEN, V202, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.07.001
  29. Lombardi EMS, 2011, J BRAS PNEUMOL, V37, P118, DOI 10.1590/S1806-37132011000100017
  30. Smith PH, 2016, PREV MED, V92, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.07.013
  31. Smith PH, 2015, NICOTINE TOB RES, V17, P463, DOI 10.1093/ntr/ntu212
  32. Smith PH, 2014, DRUG ALCOHOL DEPEN, V142, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.003
  33. Smith SS, 2009, ARCH INTERN MED, V169, P2148, DOI 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.426
  34. Stead LF, 2017, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001007.pub3
  35. Stead LF, 2016, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD008286.pub3
  36. Steinberg MB, 2006, AM J PREV MED, V30, P405, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.12.008
  37. Tong VT, 2013, MMWR SURVEILL SUMM, V62, P1
  38. Torchalla I, 2011, J SMOK CESS, V6, P9, DOI 10.1375/jsc.6.1.9
  39. Waters AF, 2018, ADDICT BEHAV, V84, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.03.018
  40. Wray JM, 2018, NICOTINE TOB RES, V20, P1418, DOI 10.1093/ntr/ntx212