Consensus on Recording Deep Endometriosis Surgery: the CORDES statement(aEuro)

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_VANHIE_Consensus_on_Recording_Deep_Endometriosis_Surgery_the_CORDES_2016.PDF (141.36 KB)
Citações na Scopus
46
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Autores
VANHIE, A.
MEULEMAN, C.
TOMASSETTI, C.
TIMMERMAN, D.
D'HOORE, A.
WOLTHUIS, A.
CLEYNENBREUGEL, B. Van
DANCET, E.
BROECK, U. Van den
TSALTAS, J.
Citação
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, v.31, n.6, p.1219-1223, 2016
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Which essential items should be recorded before, during and after endometriosis surgery and in clinical outcome based surgical trials in patients with deep endometriosis (DE)? A DE surgical sheet (DESS) was developed for standardized reporting of the surgical treatment of DE and an international expert consensus proposal on relevant items that should be recorded in surgical outcome trials in women with DE. Surgery is an important treatment for symptomatic DE. So far, data have been reported in such a way that comparison of different surgical techniques is impossible. Therefore, we present an international expert proposal for standardized reporting of surgical treatment and surgical outcome trials in women with DE. International expert consensus based on a systematic review of literature. Taking into account recommendations from Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT), the Innovation Development Exploration Assessment and Long-term Study (IDEAL), the Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in Clinical trials (IMMPACT) and the World Endometriosis Research Foundation Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project (WERF EPHect), a systematic literature review on surgical treatment of DE was performed and resulted in a proposal for standardized reporting, adapted by contributions from eight members of the multidisciplinary Leuven University Hospitals Endometriosis Care Program, from 18 international experts and from audience feedback during three international meetings. We have developed the DESS to record in detail the surgical procedures for DE, and an international consensus on pre-, intra- and post-operative data that should be recorded in surgical outcome trials on DE. The recommendations in this paper represent a consensus among international experts based on a systematic review of the literature. For several items and recommendations, high-quality RCTs were not available. Further research is needed to validate and evaluate the recommendations presented here. This international expert consensus for standardized reporting of surgical treatment in women with DE, based on a systematic literature review and international consensus, can be used as a guideline to record and report surgical management of patients with DE and as a guideline to design, execute, interpret and compare clinical trials in this patient population. None of the authors received funding for the development of this paper. M.A. reports personal fees and non-financial support from Bayer Pharma outside the submitted work; H.T. reports a grant from Pfizer and personal fees for being on the advisory board of Perrigo, Abbvie, Allergan and SPD. N/A.
Palavras-chave
endometriosis, deep endometriosis, surgery, clinical trials, standardization of reporting, terms and definitions
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/16245
Referências
  1. Adamson GD, 2010, FERTIL STERIL, V94, P1609, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.035
  2. Becker CM, 2014, FERTIL STERIL, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.709
  3. Canis M, 1997, FERTIL STERIL, V67, P817
  4. Casper RF, 2014, FERTIL STERIL, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1211
  5. Chapron C, 2004, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1034, P326, DOI 10.1196/annals.1335.035
  6. Chapron C, 2010, FERTIL STERIL, V93, P2115, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.102
  7. Clavien PA, 2009, ANN SURG, V250, P187, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
  8. Davalos MLR, 2007, J MINIM INVAS GYN, V14, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.07.015
  9. De Cicco C, 2011, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V118, P285, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02744.x
  10. Dindo D, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P205, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
  11. Dunselman GAJ, 2014, HUM REPROD, V29, P400, DOI 10.1093/humrep/det457
  12. Haas D, 2013, ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN, V92, P3, DOI 10.1111/aogs.12026
  13. Kluivers KB, 2008, SURGERY, V143, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2007.08.017
  14. Kumar Suresh, 2012, Urol Ann, V4, P6, DOI 10.4103/0974-7796.91613
  15. McCulloch Peter, 2009, Lancet, V374, P1105, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8
  16. Meuleman C, 2011, HUM REPROD UPDATE, V17, P311, DOI 10.1093/humupd/dmq057
  17. Meuleman C, 2012, CURR OPIN OBSTET GYN, V24, P245, DOI 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283556285
  18. Nirgianakis K, 2014, ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN, V93, P1262, DOI 10.1111/aogs.12490
  19. Sibiude J, 2014, OBSTET GYNECOL, V124, P709, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000464
  20. Tuttlies F, 2005, Zentralbl Gynakol, V127, P275, DOI 10.1055/s-2005-836904
  21. Vincent K, 2010, FERTIL STERIL, V93, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.056

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOG
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/58