Influence of fetal acidemia on fetal heart rate analyzed by computerized cardiotocography in pregnancies with placental insufficiency

dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorMAEDA, Mariane de Fatima Y.
dc.contributor.authorNOMURA, Roseli M. Y.
dc.contributor.authorNIIGAKI, Juliana I.
dc.contributor.authorFRANCISCO, Rossana P. V.
dc.contributor.authorZUGAIB, Marcelo
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-28T22:25:19Z
dc.date.available2014-01-28T22:25:19Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine the influence of fetal acidemia on fetal heart rate (FHR) parameters analyzed by computerized cardiotocography (cCTG) in pregnancies with placental insufficiency. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 46 pregnancies with placental insufficiency between 26 and 34 weeks gestation by abnormal umbilical artery Doppler [pulsatility index (PI)>95th percentile]. Results: Twenty fetuses had acidemia at birth, pH<7.20 (43.5%) and 26 had normal pH (56.5%). In the analysis of FHR parameters, fetal movements (FM) per hour was significantly lower in the group with acidemia (median = 2) when compared with the group with normal pH (median = 15, p = 0.019). The values of pH correlated positively with FM (rho = 0.35; p = 0.019, 95% CI: 0.061 to 0.577) and basal FHR (rho = 0.37, p = 0,011, 95% CI: 0.090 to 0.597) and negatively with the ductus venosus (DV) PI for veins (PIV) z-score (rho = -0.31, p = 0,036, 95% CI: -0.550 to -0.021). Logistic regression showed that the DV PIV z-score (p = 0.0232) and basal FHR (p = 0.0401) were independent variables associated with acidemia at birth. Conclusions: The present results suggest that cCTG parameters may be useful in the management of cases with early onset placental insufficiency in association with Doppler velocimetry assessment, and that basal FHR and DV-PIV are most clearly in association with acidemia at birth.
dc.description.indexMEDLINE
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPESP - Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, v.26, n.18, p.1820-1824, 2013
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/14767058.2013.802304
dc.identifier.issn1476-7058
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/4143
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherINFORMA HEALTHCARE
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.rights.holderCopyright INFORMA HEALTHCARE
dc.subjectComputerized cardiotocography
dc.subjectdoppler velocimetry
dc.subjectductus venosus
dc.subjectfetal acidemia
dc.subjectplacental insufficiency
dc.subject.otherintrauterine growth restriction
dc.subject.otherretarded fetuses
dc.subject.othervenous doppler
dc.subject.otherbase status
dc.subject.otherantepartum
dc.subject.otherbirth
dc.subject.otherdysfunction
dc.subject.othervelocimetry
dc.subject.otherprediction
dc.subject.othervelocity
dc.subject.wosObstetrics & Gynecology
dc.titleInfluence of fetal acidemia on fetal heart rate analyzed by computerized cardiotocography in pregnancies with placental insufficiency
dc.typearticle
dc.type.categoryoriginal article
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
hcfmusp.citation.scopus4
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcMARIANE DE FATIMA YUKIE MAEDA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcROSELI MIEKO YAMAMOTO NOMURA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcJULIANA IKEDA NIIGAKI
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcROSSANA PULCINELI VIEIRA FRANCISCO
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcMARCELO ZUGAIB
hcfmusp.description.beginpage1820
hcfmusp.description.endpage1824
hcfmusp.description.issue18
hcfmusp.description.volume26
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.pubmed23650952
hcfmusp.origem.scopus2-s2.0-84887972813
hcfmusp.origem.wosWOS:000327321900012
hcfmusp.publisher.cityLONDON
hcfmusp.publisher.countryENGLAND
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAnceschi MM, 2004, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V86, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.05.012
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAnceschi MM, 2003, J PERINAT MED, V31, P231, DOI 10.1515/JPM.2003.031
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAnceschi MM, 1999, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V65, P267, DOI 10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00055-7
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBaschat AA, 2003, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V22, P561, DOI 10.1002/uog.902
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBaschat AA, 2007, OBSTET GYNECOL, V109, P253, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000253215.79121.75
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBaschat AA, 2003, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V21, P124, DOI 10.1002/uog.20
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBilardo CM, 2004, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V23, P119, DOI 10.1002/uog.965
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBracero LA, 1999, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V181, P1254, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70118-3
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDawes GS, 1996, J PERINAT MED, V24, P25, DOI 10.1515/jpme.1996.24.1.25
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEsposti F, 2006, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, V1, P6157
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFrancisco RPV, 2006, OBSTET GYNECOL, V107, P1042, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000209192.00890.3a
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGarcia GS, 2008, ARCH GYNECOL OBSTET, V278, P125, DOI 10.1007/s00404-007-0537-8
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGuzman ER, 1996, OBSTET GYNECOL, V87, P969, DOI 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00020-8
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHecher K, 2001, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V18, P564, DOI 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00590.x
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHuhn EA, 2011, PRENATAL DIAG, V31, P509, DOI 10.1002/pd.2728
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNijhuis IJM, 2000, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V89, P27, DOI 10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00162-1
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNomura RMY, 2009, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V147, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.06.029
hcfmusp.relation.referenceOrtigosa C, 2012, J MATERN-FETAL NEO M, V25, P2620, DOI 10.3109/14767058.2012.711394
hcfmusp.relation.referencePardey J, 2002, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V186, P1095, DOI 10.1067/mob.2002.122447
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRomano M, 2006, COMPUT BIOL MED, V36, P619, DOI 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2005.04.004
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSerra V, 2008, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V115, P1101, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01774.x
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSoncini E, 2006, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V128, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.01.001
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTuram OM, 2008, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V32, P160, DOI 10.1002/uog.5386
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTuran S, 2007, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V30, P750, DOI 10.1002/uog.4101
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVinkesteijn ASM, 2004, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V23, P461, DOI 10.1002/uog.1032
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipFAPESP
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-05-10
relation.isAuthorOfPublication753f4595-b448-44d7-8676-2a9fef953d69
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb03618a4-496d-40da-b497-92f380e5dc11
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8bcdb287-6a89-4094-a506-081f21cd7f64
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc9b8107b-5236-482d-a67f-52d0be770457
relation.isAuthorOfPublication89729188-bfe9-448f-8a78-98aa72156122
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery753f4595-b448-44d7-8676-2a9fef953d69
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
art_MAEDA_Impact_of_standardized_information_provided_by_gynecologists_on_2013.PDF
Tamanho:
358.13 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
publishedVersion (English)