Diagnostic meta-analysis: Case study in oncology
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
bookPart
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING
Autores
Citação
Marianny, S.; Afonso, S.; Leonardo, B.-L.. Diagnostic meta-analysis: Case study in oncology. In: . DIAGNOSTIC META-ANALYSIS: A USEFUL TOOL FOR CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING: SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING, 2018. p.263-284.
Resumo
Cancer represents a major public health problem worldwide. Although there have been significative advances against cancer in the last two decades, incidence and death rates are increasing for several cancer types, including liver and pancreas. Continued clinical and basic researches are needed to further improve clinical quality care and diminish mortality caused by malignancies. In this context meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies represents a reliable methodological tool that facilitates structured high-quality evidence for efficient evidence summary and optimized decision-making regarding oncologic diagnosis and prognosis. However, the relative unfamiliarity of diagnostic test accuracy methods and its interpretation represent a challenge to the clinician that must be overcome. Additionally, previous studies have highlighted a limited quality of the literature regarding assessment of reporting systematic reviews of oncologic diagnostic test accuracy studies. Improvement on the execution and reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic studies is needed. In this chapter we will summarize specific strategies to simplify the methodological complex system for reporting and interpreting case studies in oncology that will clearly have a positive impact on the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of oncologic diagnostic test accuracy studies. © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018.
Palavras-chave
Cancer, Diagnostic test accuracy study, Evidence summary, Meta-analysis
Referências
- Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Jemal, A., Cancer statistics, 2016 (2016) CA Cancer J Clin., 66, pp. 7-30
- (2015) Modern immigration wave brings 59 million to U.S., driving population growth and change through 2065: Views of immigration’s impact on U.S, , society mixed. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center
- Ferdinand, R., Mitchell, S.A., Batson, S., Tumur, I., Treatments for chronic myeloid leukemia: A qualitative systematic review (2012) J Blood Med., 3, pp. 51-76
- Amin, M.B., Greene, F.L., Edge, S.B., Compton, C.C., Gershenwald, J.E., Brookland, R.K., Meyer, L., Winchester, D.P., The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging (2017) CA Cancer J Clin., 67, pp. 93-99
- Leeflang, M.M., Deeks, J.J., Gatsonis, C., Bossuyt, P.M., Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy (2008) Ann Intern Med., 149, pp. 889-897
- Mulrow, C.D., Rationale for systematic reviews (1994) BMJ., 309, pp. 597-599
- Bossuyt, P.M., Irwig, L., Craig, J., Glasziou, P., Comparative accuracy: Assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways (2006) BMJ., 332, pp. 1089-1092
- Lord, S.J., Irwig, L., Simes, R.J., When is measuring sensitivity and specificity sufficient to evaluate a diagnostic test, and when do we need randomized trials? (2006) Ann Intern Med., 144, pp. 850-855
- Thornbury, J.R., Eugene, W., Caldwell lecture. Clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging: Love it or leave it (1994) AJR Am J Roentgenol., 162, pp. 1-8
- Glas, A.S., Roos, D., Deutekom, M., Zwinderman, A.H., Bossuyt, P.M., Kurth, K.H., Tumor markers in the diagnosis of primary bladder cancer A systematic review (2003) J Urol., 169, pp. 1975-1982
- Lokeshwar, V.B., Selzer, M.G., Urinary bladder tumor markers (2006) Urol Oncol., 24, pp. 528-537
- Deeks, J.J., Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests (2001) BMJ., 323, pp. 157-162
- Tatsioni, A., Zarin, D.A., Aronson, N., Samson, D.J., Flamm, C.R., Schmid, C., Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies (2005) Ann Intern Med., 142, pp. 1048-1055
- Begg, C.B., Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests (1987) Stat Med., 6, pp. 411-423
- Dinnes, J., Deeks, J., Kirby, J., Roderick, P., A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy (2005) Health Technol Assess., 9, pp. 1-113
- Whiting, P., Rutjes, A.W., Reitsma, J.B., Glas, A.S., Bossuyt, P.M., Kleijnen, J., Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: A systematic review (2004) Ann Intern Med., 140, pp. 189-202
- Whiting, P.F., Rutjes, A.W., Westwood, M.E., Mallett, S., Group, Q.-S., A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies (2013) J Clin Epidemiol., 66, pp. 1093-1104
- Whiting, P.F., Rutjes, A.W., Westwood, M.E., Mallett, S., Deeks, J.J., Reitsma, J.B., QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (2011) Ann Intern Med., 155, pp. 529-536
- Mallett, S., Deeks, J.J., Halligan, S., Hopewell, S., Cornelius, V., Altman, D.G., Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: Review of methods and reporting (2006) BMJ., 333, p. 413
- Oxman, A.D., Guyatt, G.H., The science of reviewing research (1993) Ann N Y Acad Sci., 703, pp. 125-133
- Navaneethan, U., Hasan, M.K., Lourdusamy, V., Njei, B., Varadarajulu, S., Hawes, R.H., Singleoperator cholangioscopy and targeted biopsies in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures: A systematic review (2015) Gastrointest Endosc., 82, pp. 608-614
- Whiting, P., Rutjes, A.W., Reitsma, J.B., Bossuyt, P.M., Kleijnen, J., The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003) BMC Med Res Methodol., 3, p. 25
- Lijmer, J.G., Mol, B.W., Heisterkamp, S., Bonsel, G.J., Prins, M.H., van der Meulen, J.H., Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests (1999) JAMA., 282, pp. 1061-1066
- Cohen, J.F., Korevaar, D.A., Altman, D.G., Bruns, D.E., Gatsonis, C.A., Hooft, L., STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration (2016) BMJ Open., 6, p. e012799
- Whiting, P., Harbord, R., Kleijnen, J., No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies (2005) BMC Med Res Methodol., 5, p. 19
- Sulbaran, M., de Moura, E., Bernardo, W., Morais, C., Oliveira, J., Bustamante-Lopez, L., Overtube-assisted enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis of small-bowel polyps and tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2016) Endosc Int Open., 4, pp. E151-E163
- Arakawa, D., Ohmiya, N., Nakamura, M., Outcome after enteroscopy for patients with obscure GI bleeding: Diagnostic comparison between double-balloon endoscopy and videocapsule endoscopy (2009) Gastrointest Endosc., 69, pp. 866-874
- Buscaglia, J.M., Richards, R., Wilkinson, M.N., Diagnostic yield of spiral enteroscopy when performed for the evaluation of abnormal capsule endoscopy findings (2011) J Clin Gastroenterol., 45, pp. 342-346
- Fry, L.C., Neumann, H., Kuester, D., Small bowel polyps and tumours: Endoscopic detection and treatment by double-balloon enteroscopy (2009) Aliment Pharmacol Ther., 29, pp. 135-142
- Fujimori, S., Seo, T., Gudis, K., Diagnosis and treatment of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding using combined capsule endoscopy and double balloon endoscopy: 1-year follow-up study (2007) Endoscopy., 39, pp. 1053-1058
- Kamalaporn, P., Cho, S., Basset, N., Double-balloon enteroscopy following capsule endoscopy in the management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: Outcome of a combined approach (2008) Can J Gastroenterol., 22, pp. 491-495
- Kameda, N., Higuchi, K., Shiba, M., A prospective, single-blind trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (2008) J Gastroenterol., 43, pp. 434-440
- Lee, B.I., Choi, H., Choi, K.Y., Clinical characteristics of small bowel tumors diagnosed by double-balloon endoscopy: KASID multi-center study (2011) Dig Dis Sci., 56, pp. 2920-2927
- Manno, M., Riccioni, M.E., Cannizzaro, R., Diagnostic and therapeutic yield of single balloon enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel disease: Results of the Italian multicentre study (2013) Dig Liver Dis., 45, pp. 211-215
- Marmo, R., Rotondano, G., Casetti, T., Degree of concordance between double-balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: A multicenter study (2009) Endoscopy., 41, pp. 587-592
- Matsumoto, T., Esaki, M., Moriyama, T., Comparison of capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy with the doubleballoon method in patients with obscure bleeding and polyposis (2005) Endoscopy., 37, pp. 827-832
- Nakamura, M., Niwa, Y., Ohmiya, N., Preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding (2006) Endoscopy., 38, pp. 59-66
- Partridge, B.J., Tokar, J.L., Haluszka, O., Small bowel cancers diagnosed by device-assisted enteroscopy at a U.S referral center: A five-year experience (2011) Dig Dis Sci., 56, pp. 2701-2705
- Sethi, S., Cohen, J., Thaker, A.M., Prior capsule endoscopy improves the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of single-balloon enteroscopy (2014) Dig Dis Sci., 59, pp. 2497-2502
- Vere, C.C., Foarfă, C., Streba, C.T., Videocapsule endoscopy and single balloon enteroscopy: Novel diagnostic techniques in small bowel pathology (2009) Rom J Morphol Embryol., 50, pp. 467-474
- Li, X.B., Ge, Z.Z., Dai, J., The role of capsule endoscopy combined with double-balloon enteroscopy in diagnosis of small bowel diseases (2007) Chin Med J (Engl)., 120, pp. 30-35
- Westwood, M.E., Whiting, P.F., Kleijnen, J., How does study quality affect the results of a diagnostic meta-analysis? (2005) BMC Med Res Methodol., 5, p. 20
- Leeflang, M., Reitsma, J., Scholten, R., Rutjes, A., Di Nisio, M., Deeks, J., Impact of adjustment for quality on results of metaanalyses of diagnostic accuracy (2007) Clin Chem., 53, pp. 164-172
- Jones, C.M., Athanasiou, T., Diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis: Review of an important tool in radiological research and decision making (2009) Br J Radiol., 82, pp. 441-446
- Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature (1987) Ann Intern Med., 106, pp. 598-604
- Ochodo, E.A., de Haan, M.C., Reitsma, J.B., Hooft, L., Bossuyt, P.M., Leeflang, M.M., Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: Evidence of “spin” (2013) Radiology., 267, pp. 581-588
- Sorensen, H.T., Sabroe, S., Olsen, J., A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological research (1996) Int J Epidemiol., 25, pp. 435-442
- Leeflang, M.M., Bossuyt, P.M., Irwig, L., Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: Implications for evidence-based diagnosis (2009) J Clin Epidemiol., 62, pp. 5-12
- Doubilet, P., Herman, P.G., Interpretation of radiographs: Effect of clinical history (1981) AJR Am J Roentgenol., 137, pp. 1055-1058
- Philbrick, J.T., Horwitz, R.I., Feinstein, A.R., Methodologic problems of exercise testing for coronary artery disease: Groups, analysis and bias (1980) Am J Cardiol., 46, pp. 807-812
- Knottnerus, J.A., Buntinx, F., (2008) The evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Theory and methods of diagnostic research, , 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books
- Ransohoff, D.F., Feinstein, A.R., Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests (1978) N Engl J Med., 299, pp. 926-930
- Knottnerus, J.A., Muris, J.W., Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: The cross-sectional study (2003) J Clin Epidemiol., 56, pp. 1118-1128
- Lang, T.A., Secic, M., (1997) Generalizing from a sample to a population: Reporting estimates and confidence intervals, , Philadelphia: American College of Physicians
- Ioannidis, J.P., Evans, S.J., Gøtzsche, P.C., O’Neill, R.T., Altman, D.G., Schulz, K., Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: An extension of the CONSORT statement (2004) Ann Intern Med., 141, pp. 781-788
- Ioannidis, J.P., Lau, J., Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: An evaluation of 7 medical areas (2001) JAMA., 285, pp. 437-443