Instrument to evaluate the knowledge of patient with cirrhosis on his disease: construction and validity

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_STELMACH_Instrument_to_evaluate_the_knowledge_of_patient_with_2021.PDF (1.01 MB)
Citações na Scopus
1
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2021
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
BMC
Autores
Citação
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, v.21, n.1, article ID 83, 7p, 2021
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
BackgroundThe application of measurement instruments is a strategy to evaluate the patient's knowledge about the disease. This study aims to build an instrument that evaluates the patient's knowledge about liver cirrhosis.MethodThis study includes three phases. The first one was the construction of the instrument based on a literature review. In the second phase, five experts were participated in the evaluation of the instrument, to check the validity of the content. Quantitative and qualitative analyzes were made. The tool used was the CVI (Content Validity Index) and it was used the semantic study of the questions. The third phase was the process of the restructuring the instrument.ResultsThe final version of the instrument consisted of 36 questions. The instrument was evaluated in 91.7 by the average CVI and 94.4% by the universal CVI.ConclusionsThe questions are properly structured and clear, therefore, understandable. Thus, the final instrument presented satisfactory content validity, so that, it reached the aim of this study.
Palavras-chave
Liver cirrhosis, Validation studies, Health education, Surveys and questionnaires knowledge
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/39865
Referências
  1. Almanasreh E, 2019, RES SOC ADMIN PHARM, V15, P214, DOI 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066
  2. Bonin CDB, 2014, ARQ BRAS CARDIOL, V102, P364, DOI 10.5935/abc.20140032
  3. Bezerra CM, 2018, REV BRAS ENFERM, V71, P3020, DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0098
  4. Bittencourt PL, 2016, LIVER TRANSPLANT, V22, P1254, DOI 10.1002/lt.24487
  5. Alexandre NMC, 2011, CIENC SAUDE COLETIVA, V16, P3061, DOI 10.1590/S1413-81232011000800006
  6. de Souza AC, 2017, EPIDEMIOL SERV SAUDE, V26, P649, DOI 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022
  7. Dias Teixeira Maria Cristina, 2005, Ann Hepatol, V4, P264
  8. Fan YH, 2018, BMC INFECT DIS, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12879-018-3122-9
  9. Gorenstein C., 2016, INSTRUMENTOS AVALIA, DOI [10.1590/0047-2085000000136, DOI 10.1590/0047-2085000000136]
  10. Keszei AP, 2010, J PSYCHOSOM RES, V68, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.006
  11. Muci S, 2010, Rio de Janeiro, V26, P199, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2010000100021
  12. Muir AJ, 2015, CLIN THER, V37, P1822, DOI 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.05.507
  13. Coluci MZO, 2015, CIENC SAUDE COLETIVA, V20, P925, DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015203.04332013
  14. Padilha Kátia Melissa, 2004, Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem, V12, P453, DOI 10.1590/S0104-11692004000300002
  15. Pasquali L., 1998, REV PSIQUIATR CLIN, V25, P206
  16. Rodrigues AB, 2018, REV BRAS ENFERM, V71, P1899, DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0227
  17. Rodrigues IB, 2017, BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5
  18. Saberifiroozi Mehdi, 2017, Middle East J Dig Dis, V9, P189, DOI 10.15171/mejdd.2017.73
  19. Mendes KDS, 2013, REV LAT-AM ENFERM, V21, P419, DOI 10.1590/S0104-11692013000100018
  20. Siklosi KR, 2010, J CYST FIBROS, V9, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.jcf.2010.07.001
  21. Taddeo PD, 2012, CIENC SAUDE COLETIVA, V17, P2923, DOI 10.1590/S1413-81232012001100009
  22. Webb SM, 2013, HEALTH QUAL LIFE OUT, V11, DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-11-97
  23. Wright JP, 2018, JAMA SURG, V153, P137, DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3832
  24. Zamanzadeh Vahid, 2015, J Caring Sci, V4, P165, DOI 10.15171/jcs.2015.017
  25. Zschocke I, 2014, ARCH DERMATOL RES, V306, P287, DOI 10.1007/s00403-014-1446-x

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MGT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IOT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/37