Effects of alveolar recruitment maneuvers on clinical outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
92
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER
Autores
FIGUEIRO, Mabel
LARANJEIRA, Ligia
OLIVEIRA, Claudia
BUEHLER, Anna Maria
BERWANGER, Otavio
Citação
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, v.40, n.9, p.1227-1240, 2014
Resumo
To assess the effects of alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARMs) on clinical outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We conducted a search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science (from inception to July 2014) databases for all (i.e. no language restriction) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of ARMs versus no ARMs in adults with ARDS. Four teams of two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility of the studies identified during the search and appraised the risk of bias and extracted data from those which were assessed as meeting the inclusion criteria. Data were pooled using the random-effects model. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to establish monitoring boundaries to limit global type I error due to repetitive testing for our primary outcome (in-hospital mortality). The GRADE system was used to rate the quality of evidence. Our database search identified ten RCTs (1,594 patients, 612 events) which satisfied the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis assessing the effect of ARMs on in-hospital mortality showed a risk ratio (RR) of 0.84 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.95; I (2) = 0 %], although the quality of evidence was considered to be low due to the risk of bias in the included trials and the indirectness of the evidence-that is, ARMs were usually conducted together with other ventilatory interventions which may affect the outcome of interest. There were no differences in the rates of barotrauma (RR 1.11; 95 % CI 0.78-1.57; I (2) = 0 %) or need for rescue therapies (RR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.41-1.40; I (2) = 56 %). Most trials found no difference between groups in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. The TSA showed that the available evidence for the effect of ARMs on in-hospital mortality is precise in the case of a type I error of 5 %, but it is not precise with a type I error of 1 %. Although ARMs may decrease the mortality of patients with ARDS without increasing the risk for major adverse events, current evidence is not definitive. Large-scale ongoing trials addressing this question may provide data better applicable to clinical practice.
Palavras-chave
Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Recruitment maneuver, Mechanical ventilation, Systematic review, Meta-analysis, Randomized
Referências
- *AM THOR SOC, 1999, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V160, P2118
- Amato MBP, 1998, NEW ENGL J MED, V338, P347, DOI 10.1056/NEJM199802053380602
- *ART INV, 2012, TRIALS, V13, P153, DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-153
- Azevedo LCP, 2013, CRIT CARE, V17, DOI 10.1186/cc12594
- Barbas CSV, 2005, CURR OPIN CRIT CARE, V11, P18, DOI 10.1097/00075198-200502000-00004
- BERNARD GR, 1994, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V149, P818
- Borges JB, 2006, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V174, P268, DOI 10.1164/rccm.200506-97OC
- Briel M, 2010, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V303, P865, DOI 10.1001/jama.2010.218
- Brower Roy G, 2003, Crit Care Med, V31, P2592
- Brower RG, 2004, NEW ENGL J MED, V351, P327
- Chiumello D, 1999, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V160, P109
- de Matos GFJ, 2012, CRIT CARE, V16, DOI 10.1186/cc10602
- Devereaux PJ, 2005, BRIT MED J, V331, P313, DOI 10.1136/bmj.38503.623646.8F
- Egger M, 1998, BRIT MED J, V316, P61
- Fan E, 2008, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V178, P1156, DOI 10.1164/rccm.200802-335OC
- Ferguson ND, 2012, INTENS CARE MED, V38, P1573, DOI 10.1007/s00134-012-2682-1
- Gattinoni L, 2010, CRIT CARE MED, V38, pS539, DOI 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f1fcf7
- Guyatt GH, 2011, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V64, P380, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011
- HIGGENS JPT, 2009, COCHRANE HANDBOOK FO
- Higgins JPT, 2003, BRIT MED J, V327, P557, DOI 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
- HODGSON C, 2009, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V15, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD006667
- HODGSON C, 2012, MULTICENTRE TRIAL OP
- Hodgson CL, 2011, CRIT CARE, V15, DOI 10.1186/cc10249
- Huh JW, 2009, CRIT CARE, V13, DOI 10.1186/cc7725
- KACMAREK RM, 2007, ARDSNET PROTOCOL VS
- Lim CM, 2003, CRIT CARE MED, V31, P411, DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000048631.88155.39
- Liu WL, 2011, RESPIROLOGY, V16, P258
- Long Yun, 2006, Zhonghua Jiehe He Huxi Zazhi, V29, P549
- MEADE MO, 2002, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V165, pA683
- Meade MO, 2008, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V299, P637, DOI 10.1001/jama.299.6.637
- Moher D, 2009, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V62, P1006, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
- MUSCEDERE JG, 1994, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V149, P1327
- Brower RG, 2000, NEW ENGL J MED, V342, P1301
- Oczenski W, 2004, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V101, P620, DOI 10.1097/00000542-200409000-00010
- Park KJ, 2003, YONSEI MED J, V44, P219
- Phua J, 2009, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V179, P220, DOI 10.1164/rccm.200805-722OC
- Pogue JM, 1997, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V18, P580, DOI 10.1016/S0197-2456(97)00051-2
- Sigurdsson MI, 2013, ACTA ANAESTH SCAND, V57, P37, DOI 10.1111/aas.12001
- Sterne JAC, 2001, BRIT MED J, V323, P101, DOI 10.1136/bmj.323.7304.101
- STEWART TE, 2007, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V175, pA943
- SUZUMURA EA, 2013, INTENS CARE MED S, V39, P374, DOI 10.1007/S00134-013-3095-5
- Villar J, 2006, CRIT CARE MED, V34, P1311, DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215598.84885.01
- Wang Xiao-zhi, 2007, Zhonghua Jiehe He Huxi Zazhi, V30, P44
- Xi XM, 2010, CHINESE MED J-PEKING, V123, P3100, DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2010.21.027