Recombinant protein KR95 as an alternative for serological diagnosis of human visceral leishmaniasis in the Americas

dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorFUJIMORI, Mahyumi
dc.contributor.authorVALENCIA-PORTILLO, Ruth Tamara
dc.contributor.authorLINDOSO, Jose Angelo Lauletta
dc.contributor.authorCELESTE, Beatriz Julieta
dc.contributor.authorALMEIDA, Roque Pacheco de
dc.contributor.authorCOSTA, Carlos Henrique Nery
dc.contributor.authorCRUZ, Alda Maria da
dc.contributor.authorDRUZIAN, Angelita Fernandes
dc.contributor.authorDUTHIE, Malcolm Scott
dc.contributor.authorFORTALEZA, Carlos Magno Castelo Branco
dc.contributor.authorOLIVEIRA, Ana Lucia Lyrio de
dc.contributor.authorPANIAGO, Anamaria Mello C. Miranda
dc.contributor.authorQUEIROZ, Igor Thiago
dc.contributor.authorREED, Steve
dc.contributor.authorVALLUR, Aarthy
dc.contributor.authorGOTO, Hiro
dc.contributor.authorSANCHEZ, Maria Carmen Arroyo
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-21T14:14:52Z
dc.date.available2023-06-21T14:14:52Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractIn the Americas, visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is caused by the protozoan Leishmania infantum, leading to death if not promptly diagnosed and treated. In Brazil, the disease reaches all regions, and in 2020, 1,933 VL cases were reported with 9.5% lethality. Thus, an accurate diagnosis is essential to provide the appropriate treatment. Serological VL diagnosis is based mainly on immunochromatographic tests, but their performance may vary by location, and evaluation of diagnostic alternatives is necessary. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the performance of ELISA with the scantily studied recombinant antigens, K18 and KR95, comparing their performance with the already known rK28 and rK39. Sera from parasitologically confirmed symptomatic VL patients (n = 90) and healthy endemic controls (n = 90) were submitted to ELISA with rK18 and rKR95. Sensitivity (95% CI) was, respectively, 83.3% (74.2-89.7) and 95.6% (88.8-98.6), and specificity (95% CI) was 93.3% (85.9-97.2) and 97.8% (91.8-99.9). For validation of ELISA with the recombinant antigens, we included samples from 122 VL patients and 83 healthy controls collected in three regions in Brazil (Northeast, Southeast, and Midwest). When comparing the results obtained with the VL patients' samples, significantly lower sensitivity was obtained by rK18-ELISA (88.5%, 95% CI: 81.5-93.2) compared with rK28-ELISA (95.9%, 95% CI: 90.5-98.5), but the sensitivity was similar comparing rKR95-ELISA (95.1%, 95% CI: 89.5-98.0), rK28-ELISA (95.9%, 95% CI: 90.5-98.5), and rK39-ELISA (94.3%, 95% CI: 88.4-97.4). Analyzing the specificity, it was lowest with rK18-ELISA (62.7%, 95% CI: 51.9-72.3) with 83 healthy control samples. Conversely, higher and similar specificity was obtained by rKR95-ELISA (96.4%, 95% CI: 89.5-99.2), rK28-ELISA (95.2%, 95% CI: 87.9-98.5), and rK39-ELISA (95.2%, 95% CI: 87.9-98.5). There was no difference in sensitivity and specificity across localities. Cross-reactivity assessment, performed with sera of patients diagnosed with inflammatory disorders and other infectious diseases, was 34.2% with rK18-ELISA and 3.1% with rKR95-ELISA. Based on these data, we suggest using recombinant antigen KR95 in serological assays for VL diagnosis.eng
dc.description.indexMEDLINE
dc.description.indexPubMed
dc.description.indexWoS
dc.description.indexScopus
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE, v.18, n.3, 2023
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0282483
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/54009
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCEeng
dc.relation.ispartofPlos One
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.rights.holderCopyright PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCEeng
dc.subject.otherdirect agglutination-testeng
dc.subject.othertestseng
dc.subject.otherinfantumeng
dc.subject.otherantigeneng
dc.subject.otherserodiagnosiseng
dc.subject.otherinfectioneng
dc.subject.otherantibodyeng
dc.subject.otherdonovanieng
dc.subject.otherrk39eng
dc.subject.wosMultidisciplinary Scienceseng
dc.titleRecombinant protein KR95 as an alternative for serological diagnosis of human visceral leishmaniasis in the Americaseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.categoryoriginal articleeng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
dspace.entity.typePublication
hcfmusp.affiliation.countryEstados Unidos
hcfmusp.affiliation.countryisous
hcfmusp.author.externalALMEIDA, Roque Pacheco de:Univ Fed Sergipe, Hosp Univ, Dept Med Interna & Patol, EBSERH, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalCOSTA, Carlos Henrique Nery:Univ Fed Piaui, Inst Natan Portella Doencas Tropicais, Teresina, PI, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalCRUZ, Alda Maria da:Fiocruz MS, Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Lab Interdisciplinar Pesquisas Med, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalDRUZIAN, Angelita Fernandes:Univ Fed Mato Grosso do Sul, Fac Med, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalDUTHIE, Malcolm Scott:HDT Bio, Seattle, WA USA
hcfmusp.author.externalFORTALEZA, Carlos Magno Castelo Branco:Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Doencas Tropicais & Diagnost Imagem, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalOLIVEIRA, Ana Lucia Lyrio de:Univ Fed Mato Grosso do Sul, Fac Med, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalPANIAGO, Anamaria Mello C. Miranda:Univ Fed Mato Grosso do Sul, Fac Med, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalQUEIROZ, Igor Thiago:Hosp Giselda Trigueiro, Secretaria Estadual Saude Publ, Natal, RN, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalREED, Steve:HDT Bio, Seattle, WA USA
hcfmusp.author.externalVALLUR, Aarthy:InBios Int Inc, Seattle, WA USA
hcfmusp.citation.scopus0
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcMAHYUMI FUJIMORI
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcRUTH TAMARA VALENCIA PORTILLO
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcJOSE ANGELO LAULETTA LINDOSO
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcBEATRIZ JULIETA CELESTE
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcHIRO GOTO
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcMARIA CARMEN ARROYO SANCHEZ
hcfmusp.description.issue3
hcfmusp.description.volume18
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.pubmed36862710
hcfmusp.origem.scopus2-s2.0-85149331471
hcfmusp.origem.wosWOS:000943271500011
hcfmusp.publisher.citySAN FRANCISCOeng
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSAeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSanchez MCA, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0230610eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBanoo S, 2006, NAT REV MICROBIOL, pS20, DOI 10.1038/nrmicro1570eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBoarino A, 2005, CLIN DIAGN LAB IMMUN, V12, P647, DOI 10.1128/CDLI.12.5.647-653.2005eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBoelaert M., 2007, Nature Reviews Microbiology, pS30, DOI 10.1038/nrmicro1766eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBURNS JM, 1993, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V90, P775, DOI 10.1073/pnas.90.2.775eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBurza S, 2018, LANCET, V392, P951, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31204-2eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCDC-DPDx Laboratory Identification of Parasites of Public Health Concern, 2017, LEISHMANIASISeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChappuis F, 2007, NAT REV MICROBIOL, V5, P873, DOI 10.1038/nrmicro1748eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChappuis F, 2006, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V333, P723, DOI 10.1136/bmj.38917.503056.7Ceng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCota GF, 2013, AM J TROP MED HYG, V89, P570, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0239eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCruz I, 2022, ASSESSMENT CROSS REA, P865eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCunningham J, 2012, CLIN INFECT DIS, V55, P1312, DOI 10.1093/cid/cis716eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDeniau M, 2003, ANN TROP MED PARASIT, V97, P115, DOI 10.1179/000349803225002598eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencedos Santos ARR, 2019, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V114, DOI 10.1590/0074-02760180405eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFigueiredo MM, 2021, J IMMUNOL RES, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/5568077eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFleiss J. L., 2013, STAT METHODS RATES Peng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFreire ML, 2019, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007484eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFujimori M, 2021, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V116, DOI 10.1590/0074-02760200428eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGeorgiadou SP, 2015, J TRANSL INTERN MED, V3, P43, DOI 10.1515/jtim-2015-0002eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGoto Y, 2006, INFECT IMMUN, V74, P3939, DOI 10.1128/IAI.00101-06eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHasker E, 2013, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002053eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHerwaldt BL, 1999, LANCET, V354, P1191, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10178-2eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHO EA, 1948, T ROY SOC TROP MED H, V41, P629, DOI 10.1016/S0035-9203(48)90458-1eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKuhne V, 2019, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007658eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLANDIS JR, 1977, BIOMETRICS, V33, P159, DOI 10.2307/2529310eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencede Assis TSM, 2012, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V17, P1202, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.03064.xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMohammed Rezika, 2022, PLOS NEGLECT TROP Deng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMukhtar M, 2015, T ROY SOC TROP MED H, V109, P594, DOI 10.1093/trstmh/trv060eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePAHO/WHO, LEISHMANIASISeng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePattabhi S, 2010, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000822eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePedras MJ, 2008, T ROY SOC TROP MED H, V102, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.11.004eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePorrozzi R, 2007, CLIN VACCINE IMMUNOL, V14, P544, DOI 10.1128/CVI.00420-06eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRuiz-Postigo J.A., 2021, WHO WEEKLY EPIDEMIOL, V35, P19eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSinan/SVS/MS, 2020, CAS CONF LEISHM VISCeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSinan/SVS/MS, 2021, TAX LET LEISHM VISCeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSrivastava P, 2011, T ROY SOC TROP MED H, V105, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.trstmh.2010.09.006eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSundar S, 1998, LANCET, V351, P563, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)04350-Xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceThakur Shivani, 2020, J Parasit Dis, V44, P253, DOI 10.1007/s12639-020-01212-weng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVallur AC, 2015, EUR J CLIN MICROBIOL, V34, P679, DOI 10.1007/s10096-014-2282-9eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVallur AC, 2016, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V54, P1025, DOI 10.1128/JCM.02620-15eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWorld Health Organization, LEISHM KEY FACTSeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceZIJLSTRA EE, 1992, T ROY SOC TROP MED H, V86, P505, DOI 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90086-Reng
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-05-17
relation.isAuthorOfPublication37cc3ab3-dae7-4f5d-baf5-0e1f169508ce
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7ea942ef-87c3-43c2-863e-df1a6969a6d7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1c8fa285-4408-4b15-9ed4-a7209ef85fc5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication446fd013-3559-41b9-9a03-7e3b604cb0d6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication828c0e9b-0b30-4878-9b33-414bd0103241
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd13852d6-69c6-472f-a761-a06c4204e701
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery37cc3ab3-dae7-4f5d-baf5-0e1f169508ce
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
art_GABRIEL_Factors_associated_with_higher_quality_of_clinical_practice_2023.PDF
Tamanho:
1.48 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
publishedVersion (English)