A systematic review of ultrasonography-guided transvaginal aspiration of recurrent ovarian endometrioma
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
22
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
Autores
Citação
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, v.134, n.1, p.3-7, 2016
Resumo
Background: Ovarian endometriosis is present in 17%-44% of women with endometriosis. The main treatment is surgery, but ultrasonography-guided aspiration is a less invasive alternative. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of this alternative treatment in recurrent ovarian endometrioma. Search strategy: Multiple databases were searched for articles published between 1994 and 2014 using the keywords ""ultrasound-guided aspiration,"" ""ovarian,"" and ""endometriosis."" Selection criteria: Randomized controlled trials and observational studies published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish were included. Data collection and analysis: Two researchers independently extracted and reviewed the data. The main outcome of interest was the recurrence rate. Main results: Eight studies were eligible. Ovarian endometriosis is associated with high recurrence rates after one ultrasonography-guided aspiration (28.9%-91.5%), but involves less ovarian manipulation. The results of aspiration followed by sclerotherapy are not uniform, but overall the addition of a sclerosing agent does not seem to significantly reduce the likelihood of recurrence (13.3%-75.0%). Repeated aspiration of the cysts can reduce the recurrence rate to 5.4% by the sixth aspiration. Conclusions: Repeated ultrasonography-guided aspiration of ovarian endometriomas can be performed for the treatment of recurrent ovarian endometriosis. Further studies comparing the efficacy of this procedure and ovarian surgery are needed.
Palavras-chave
Ovarian endometriosis, Treatment, Ultrasonography-guided aspiration
Referências
- ABOULGHAR MA, 1991, HUM REPROD, V6, P1408
- Aden P, 2013, ISRN OBSTET GYNECOL, V2013, DOI 10.1155/2013/242149
- Acien P, 2003, GYNECOL OBSTET INVES, V55, P96, DOI 10.1159/000070181
- Agostini A, 2007, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V130, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.01.015
- Bellelis P, 2010, REV ASSOC MED BRAS, V56, P467, DOI 10.1590/S0104-42302010000400022
- Berlanda N, 2010, CURR OPIN OBSTET GYN, V22, P320, DOI 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32833bea15
- Chamie LP, 2011, RADIOGRAPHICS, V31, pE77, DOI [10.1148/rg.314105193, 10.1148/rg.314105193/-/DC1]
- Chan LY, 2003, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V109, P196, DOI 10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00011-3
- Chang CC, 1997, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V59, P31, DOI 10.1016/S0020-7292(97)00122-7
- Chang MY, 2013, J MINIM INVAS GYN, V20, P595, DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.03.004
- Chapron C, 2002, HUM REPROD UPDATE, V8, P591, DOI 10.1093/humupd/8.6.591
- CORNILLIE FJ, 1990, FERTIL STERIL, V53, P978
- Goncalves MOD, 2010, HUM REPROD, V25, P665, DOI 10.1093/humrep/dep433
- Dunselman GAJ, 2014, HUM REPROD, V29, P400, DOI 10.1093/humrep/det457
- Guo SW, 2009, HUM REPROD UPDATE, V15, P441, DOI 10.1093/humupd/dmp007
- Guo YH, 2012, CONTEMP CLIN TRIALS, V33, P1206, DOI 10.1016/j.cct.2012.07.009
- Hart RJ, 2008, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V16
- Hsieh CL, 2009, FERTIL STERIL, V91, P2709, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.056
- KHAW KT, 1990, CLIN RADIOL, V41, P105, DOI 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)80139-4
- Koga Kaori, 2013, Front Biosci (Elite Ed), V5, P676
- Koga K, 2015, FERTIL STERIL, V104, P793, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.026
- MAIS V, 1993, FERTIL STERIL, V60, P776
- Menakaya U, 2013, HUM REPROD, V28, P3162, DOI 10.1093/humrep/det346
- Ray Sailesh, 2014, J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc, V15, P6, DOI 10.5152/jtgga.2014.10179
- Rimbach S, 2013, GEBURTSH FRAUENHEILK, V73, P918, DOI 10.1055/s-0033-1350890
- Velasco I, 2005, FERTIL STERIL, V83, P873, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.10.035
- Vercellini P, 2009, ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN, V88, P1074, DOI 10.1080/00016340903214973
- Vercellini P, 2011, HUM REPROD, V26, P3, DOI 10.1093/humrep/deq302
- Zhu W, 2011, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V204, p61e1