Diode Laser for Laryngeal Surgery: a Systematic Review
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
37
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
Citação
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, v.20, n.2, p.172-179, 2016
Resumo
Abstract Introduction The diode laser has been frequently used in the management of laryngeal disorders. The portability and functional diversity of this tool make it a reasonable alternative to conventional lasers. However, whether diode laser has been applied in transoral laser microsurgery, the ideal parameters, outcomes, and adverse effects remain unclear. Objective The main objective of this systematic review is to provide a reliable evaluation of the use of diode laser in laryngeal diseases, trying to clarify its ideal parameters in the larynx, as well as its outcomes and complications. Data Synthesis We included eleven studies in the final analysis. From the included articles, we collected data on patient and lesion characteristics, treatment (diode laser's parameters used in surgery), and outcomes related to the laser surgery performed. Only two studies were prospective and there were no randomized controlled trials. Most of the evidence suggests that the diode laser can be a useful tool for treatment of different pathologies in the larynx. In this sense, the parameters must be set depending on the goal (vaporization, section, or coagulation) and the clinical problem. Conclusion: The literature lacks studies on the ideal parameters of the diode laser in laryngeal surgery. The available data indicate that diode laser is a useful tool that should be considered in laryngeal surgeries. Thus, large, well-designed studies correlated with diode compared with other lasers are needed to better estimate its effects.
Palavras-chave
diode laser, larynx, vocal fold, glottis, laryngeal neoplasms
Referências
- Bajaj Y, 2009, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V123, P1348, DOI 10.1017/S0022215109990983
- Bajaj Y, 2010, INT J CLIN PRACT, V64, P51, DOI 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01734.x
- Benninger MS, 2000, LARYNGOSCOPE, V110, P1, DOI 10.1097/00005537-200002001-00001
- Bitar MA, 2005, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V132, P226, DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.136
- Canis M, 2015, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V37, P889, DOI 10.1002/hed.23688
- Comert E, 2014, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V150, P818, DOI 10.1177/0194599814521775
- Dhar P, 2011, TRENDANAESTH CRIT, V1, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.tacc.2011.01.011
- Edizer DT, 2013, Istanb Med J, V14, P12
- Fanjul M, 2008, Cir Pediatr, V21, P79
- Ferri E, 2006, Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp, V57, P270
- Ferri E, 2008, AM J OTOLARYNG, V29, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.amjoto.2007.03.004
- Karasu MF, 2014, J VOICE, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.10.017
- Liu SC, 2013, J VOICE, V27, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.10.009
- Lucioni M, 2011, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V268, P1771, DOI 10.1007/s00405-011-1695-7
- Ozdemir S, 2013, JAMA OTOLARYNGOL, V139, P401, DOI 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.41
- Rubinstein M, 2011, LASER MED SCI, V26, P113, DOI 10.1007/s10103-010-0834-5
- Saetti R, 2003, Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, V23, P33
- Saetti R, 2008, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V134, P848, DOI 10.1001/archotol.134.8.848
- STRONG MS, 1972, ANN OTO RHINOL LARYN, V81, P791
- Sullins KE, 2002, VET CLIN N AM-SMALL, V32, P639, DOI 10.1016/S0195-5616(02)00013-X
- Tuncel U, 2013, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V149, P445, DOI 10.1177/0194599813487684
- Vilaseca I, 2010, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V32, P929, DOI 10.1002/hed.21288
- Xu W, 2007, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, V127, P637, DOI 10.1080/00016480600987776
- Yan Y, 2010, J VOICE, V24, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.09.006